SPH-BEM simulation of underwater explosion and bubble dynamics near rigid wall (original) (raw)

References

1. Hu J, Chen Z Y, Zhang X D, et al. Underwater explosion in centrifuge. Part I: Validation and calibration of scaling laws. Sci China Tech Sci, 2017, 60: 1638–1657
   Google Scholar
2. Yuan L, Zhou H Y, Liang X Q, et al. Underwater explosion in centrifuge. Part II: Dynamic responses of defensive steel plate. Sci China Tech Sci, 2017, 60: 1941–1957
   Google Scholar
3. Zhang Z, Wang L, Silberschmidt V V. Damage response of steel plate to underwater explosion: Effect of shaped charge liner. Int J Impact Eng, 2017, 103: 38–49
   Article Google Scholar
4. Cui P, Zhang A M, Wang S P, et al. Ice breaking by a collapsing bubble. J Fluid Mech, 2018, 841: 287–309
   Article Google Scholar
5. Zhang A M, Yang W S, Huang C, et al. Numerical simulation of column charge underwater explosion based on SPH and BEM combination. Comput Fluids, 2013, 71: 169–178
   Article MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
6. Snay H G. Underwater Explosion Phenomena: The Parameters of Migrating Bubbles. NAVORD Report. 1962
   Google Scholar
7. Snay H G, Tipton R V. Charts for the Parameters of Migrating Explosion Bubbles. NAVORD Report. 1962
   Google Scholar
8. Klaseboer E, Hung K C, Wang C, et al. Experimental and numerical investigation of the dynamics of an underwater explosion bubble near a resilient/rigid structure. J Fluid Mech, 2005, 537: 387–413
   Article MATH Google Scholar
9. Zhu X, Mu J L, Hong J B, et al. Experimental study of characters of bubble impulsion induced by underwater explosions. J Harbin Eng Univ, 2007, 28: 365–368
   Google Scholar
10. Wang H, Zhu X, Cheng Y S, et al. Experimental and numerical investigation of ship structure subjected to close-in underwater shock wave and following gas bubble pulse. Mar Struct, 2014, 39: 90–117
    Article Google Scholar
11. Chen Y, Tong Z P, Hua H X, et al. Experimental investigation on the dynamic response of scaled ship model with rubber sandwich coatings subjected to underwater explosion. Int J Impact Eng, 2009, 36: 318–328
    Article Google Scholar
12. Hung C F, Hwangfu J J. Experimental study of the behaviour of minicharge underwater explosion bubbles near different boundaries. J Fluid Mech, 2010, 651: 55–80
    Article MATH Google Scholar
13. Gong S W, Ohl S W, Klaseboer E, et al. Scaling law for bubbles induced by different external sources: Theoretical and experimental study. Phys Rev E, 2010, 81: 056317
    Article Google Scholar
14. Li J, Rong J L. Experimental and numerical investigation of the dynamic response of structures subjected to underwater explosion. Eur J Mech - B/Fluids, 2012, 32: 59–69
    Article MATH Google Scholar
15. Zhang A M, Cui P, Cui J, et al. Experimental study on bubble dynamics subject to buoyancy. J Fluid Mech, 2015, 776: 137–160
    Article Google Scholar
16. Cui P, Zhang A M, Wang S P. Small-charge underwater explosion bubble experiments under various boundary conditions. Phys Fluids, 2016, 28: 117103
    Article Google Scholar
17. Park J. A coupled runge kutta discontinuous Galerkin-direct ghost fluid (RKDG-DGF) method to near-field early-time underwater explosion (UNDEX) simulations. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 2008. 1–130
    Google Scholar
18. Barras G, Souli M, Aquelet N, et al. Numerical simulation of underwater explosions using an ALE method. The pulsating bubble phenomena. Ocean Eng, 2012, 41: 53–66
    Google Scholar
19. Miller S T, Jasak H, Boger D A, et al. A pressure-based, compressible, two-phase flow finite volume method for underwater explosions. Comput Fluids, 2013, 87: 132–143
    Article MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
20. Hsiao C T, Jayaprakash A, Kapahi A, et al. Modelling of material pitting from cavitation bubble collapse. J Fluid Mech, 2014, 755: 142–175
    Article MathSciNet Google Scholar
21. Blake J R, Gibson D C. Growth and collapse of a vapour cavity near a free surface. J Fluid Mech, 1981, 111: 123–140
    Article Google Scholar
22. Wang Q X, Yeo K S, Khoo B C, et al. Strong interaction between a buoyancy bubble and a free surface. Theoret Comput Fluid Dyn, 1996, 8: 73–88
    Article MATH Google Scholar
23. Li S, Zhang A M, Wang S, et al. Transient interaction between a particle and an attached bubble with an application to cavitation in siltladen flow. Phys Fluids, 2018, 30: 082111
    Article Google Scholar
24. Klaseboer E, Khoo B C. Boundary integral equations as applied to an oscillating bubble near a fluid-fluid interface. Comput Mech, 2004, 33: 129–138
    Article MATH Google Scholar
25. Brujan E A, Keen G S, Vogel A. The final stage of the collapse of a cavitation bubble close to a rigid boundary. Phys Fluids, 2002, 14: 85–103
    Article MATH Google Scholar
26. Wang Q X, Yeo K S, Khoo B C, et al. Vortex ring modelling of toroidal bubbles. Theor Comput Fluid Dyn, 2005, 19: 303–317
    Article MATH Google Scholar
27. Li Z R, Sun L, Zong Z, et al. A boundary element method for the simulation of non-spherical bubbles and their interactions near a free surface. Acta Mech Sin, 2012, 28: 51–65
    Article MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
28. Li Z, Sun L, Zong Z. Numerical analysis of gas bubbles in close proximity to a movable or deformable body. Arch Appl Mech, 2013, 83: 1715–1737
    Article MATH Google Scholar
29. Liu Y, Zhang A, Tian Z. Approximation of underwater explosion bubble by singularities based on BEM. Ocean Eng, 2014, 75: 46–52
    Article Google Scholar
30. Zhang A M, Liu Y L. Improved three-dimensional bubble dynamics model based on boundary element method. J Comput Phys, 2015, 294: 208–223
    Article MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
31. Zhang A M, Wu W B, Liu Y L, et al. Nonlinear interaction between underwater explosion bubble and structure based on fully coupled model. Phys Fluids, 2017, 29: 082111
    Article Google Scholar
32. Liu N N, Cui P, Ren S F, et al. Study on the interactions between two identical oscillation bubbles and a free surface in a tank. Phys Fluids, 2017, 29: 052104
    Article Google Scholar
33. Liu G R, Liu M B. Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics–A Meshfree Particle Method. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd, 2003. 1–472
    Google Scholar
34. Liu M B, Liu G R. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH): An overview and recent developments. Arch Computat Methods Eng, 2010, 17: 25–76
    Article MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
35. Hu X Y, Adams N A. An incompressible multi-phase SPH method. J Comput Phys, 2007, 227: 264–278
    Article MATH Google Scholar
36. Grenier N, Antuono M, Colagrossi A, et al. An Hamiltonian interface SPH formulation for multi-fluid and free surface flows. J Comput Phys, 2009, 228: 8380–8393
    Article MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
37. Monaghan J J, Rafiee A. A simple SPH algorithm for multi-fluid flow with high density ratios. Int J Numer Meth Fluids, 2013, 71: 537–561
    Article MathSciNet Google Scholar
38. Chen Z, Zong Z, Liu M B, et al. An SPH model for multiphase flows with complex interfaces and large density differences. J Comput Phys, 2015, 283: 169–188
    Article MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
39. Zhang Z, Sun L, Yao X, et al. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics simulation of the submarine structure subjected to a contact underwater explosion. Combust Explos Shock Waves, 2015, 51: 502–510
    Article Google Scholar
40. Swegle J W, Attaway S W. On the feasibility of using smoothed particle hydrodynamics for underwater explosion calculations. Comput Mech, 1995, 17: 151–168
    Article MATH Google Scholar
41. Zhang Z, Wang L, Ming F, et al. Application of smoothed particle hydrodynamics in analysis of shaped-charge jet penetration caused by underwater explosion. Ocean Eng, 2017, 145: 177–187
    Article Google Scholar
42. Cao X Y, Ming F R, Zhang A M, et al. Multi-phase SPH modeling of air effect on the dynamic flooding of a damaged cabin. Comput Fluids, 2018, 163: 7–19
    Article MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
43. Wang P, Zhang A M, Ming F, et al. A novel non-reflecting boundary condition for fluid dynamics solved by smoothed particle hydrodynamics. J Fluid Mech, 2019, 860: 81–114
    Article MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
44. Dobratz B M, Crawford P C. LLNL Explosive Handbook: Properties of Chemical Explosives and Explosives and Explosive Simulants. LLNL Report UCRL-52997. 1981
    Google Scholar
45. Steinberg D J. Spherical Explosions and the Equation of State of Water. LLNL Technical Report UCID-20974. 1987
    Google Scholar
46. Adami S, Hu X Y, Adams N A. A generalized wall boundary condition for smoothed particle hydrodynamics. J Comput Phys, 2012, 231: 7057–7075
    Article MathSciNet Google Scholar
47. Monaghan J J. Simulating free surface flows with SPH. J Comput Phys, 1994, 110: 399–406
    Article MATH Google Scholar
48. Zhang Y L, Yeo K S, Khoo B C, et al. 3D jet impact and toroidal bubbles. J Comput Phys, 2001, 166: 336–360
    Article MATH Google Scholar
49. Cole R H. Underwater Explosion. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1948. 118–127
    Google Scholar
50. Wang C, Khoo B C. An indirect boundary element method for three-dimensional explosion bubbles. J Comput Phys, 2004, 194: 451–480
    Article MATH Google Scholar
51. Wu G X, Hu Z Z. Simulation of nonlinear interactions between waves and floating bodies through a finite-element-based numerical tank. Proc R Soc London Ser A-Math Phys Eng Sci, 2004, 460: 2797–2817
    Article MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar

Download references