Alternative TitlesJapanese: 浦島太郎Information Episodes: 1 Status: Finished Airing Aired: Feb 1, 1918 Source: Other Duration: 1 min. Rating: G - All Ages Statistics Score: 4.691 (scored by 18571,857 users) Ranked: #1379922 based on the top anime page. Please note that 'Not yet aired' and 'R18+' titles are excluded. Popularity: #10471 Members: 3,274 Favorites: 1 Resources
DetailsCharacters & StaffVideosStatsReviewsRecommendationsInterest StacksNewsForumClubsPictures More Info Ranked #13799Popularity #10471Members 3,274SynopsisUrashima Tarou is based on a well-known Japanese folk tale about an honest fisherman who is invited to an underwater castle after saving a sea turtle on a beach from bullies.(Source: forum.bcdb.com) Note: The latest research has revealed that the film identified on this website as Urashima Tarou (supposed title), which was so named on the basis that it was believed to be a work by Seitaro Kitayama that was originally released in 1918, is actually a different film. Read more...(Source: Japanese Animated Film Classics) Note: Urashima Tarou (supposed title) is tinted in pink film. Not to be mistaken with Urashima Tarou (1931) which is a black and white film.BackgroundThe film was made available online as part of the National Project for the Sustainability of Born-Digital Cinema, supported by the Agency for Cultural Affairs, Government of Japan in the fiscal 2016.Related Entries MALxJapan -More than just anime- Characters & Voice ActorsNo characters or voice actors have been added to this title. Help improve our database by adding characters or voice actors here.StaffNo staff for this anime have been added to this title. Help improve our database by adding staff for this anime here. No opening themes have been added to this title. Help improve our database by adding an opening theme here. No ending themes have been added to this title. Help improve our database by adding an ending theme here. Reviews Feb 13, 2019 Having accidentally seen the 1931 version, I finally came upon the real, 1918 version, and as a fan of very antiquated things, I loved it!Though from the silent era, when animation was less about even using cell, which had not really come around yet even in america, and simply about what seemingly amounted to motion capturing different pictures- frame, after frame, after frame.BUt growing up with claymation shows as a child, I dont hate this.ON my quest to see much anime, I of course could not pass up any of the oldest still available to watch, and I encourage others to not pass up the... opportunity to watch this near ancient piece.Though lacking in aesthetics, it was funny to see the way the animators created the illusions of aquatic life underneath our fisherman protagonist, as well as the scenes underneath the sea itself.Oddly enough, the whole backdrop was red colored, either due to the fragility and damage over time done to the original stills or thats just how twas back than. NANDA TO?! O>oSupposedly filmed and/ or hand drawn by people at a japanese company listed at the films end, called Y.N .& Co., there is a picute of a young gal point to japanese words that, maybe, say "thanks for watching" but I could not tell. Also there is a backwards 87, likely the number of frames of single pictures that made up this historic gem. I though it was funny to see the protagonist end up old, like he had spent too much time or all his life nearly underwater be the films end, which made me chuckle at how much old things remind us that people have always been people, now and forevermore. Give it a watch at :http://animation.filmarchives.jp/works/play/72126 Reviewer’s Rating: 7 What did you think of this review? Nice0 Love it0 Funny0 Confusing0 Informative0 Well-written0 Creative0Show all Apr 2, 2021 English Version: Unfortunately there are people who still confuse this 1918 animation with other versions, but it is easy to find the original version that has only 1 minuteIt's kind of confusing because it's 1 minute, but you can easily understand the storyThe art is black and white (which is common in old films) and sometimes blinks and there are flashes of light that leave everything white, except that it is good for the timeAnd it plays a nice little song to listen to and very beautifulThe characters are seen in a rush for having 1 minute, the short shows very well the kindness of... the boyAnd this is what I think about Urashima TarouGoodbye!Versão em Português: Infelizmente tem pessoas que confundem ainda essa animação de 1918 com outras versões, mas é fácil achar a versão original que possui apenas 1 minutoÉ meio confusa por ser de 1 minuto, mesmo assim deu pra entender a história facilmenteA arte é preto e branco ( oque é comum em filmes antigos) e as vezes pisca e tem uns flashes de luz que deixa tudo branco, tirando isso é boa para épocaE toca uma musiquinha boa de se ouvir e muito bonitaOs personagens são vistos de forma corrida por ter 1 minuto, o curta mostra muito bem a bondade do meninoE foi isso que eu acho sobre Urashima TarouTchau! Reviewer’s Rating: 6 What did you think of this review? Nice0 Love it0 Funny0 Confusing0 Informative0 Well-written0 Creative0Show all Apr 4, 2017 First of all, please note that there are multiple versions of Urashima Taro. This MAL entry is for the 1918 silent short film, and it is only about 60 seconds long. If you are watching a version with narration, with any sort of sound, or that is longer than a minute (as I suspect the other review here was) this is the wrong MAL page. With that out of the way, Urashima Tarou is (as of this writing) the 3rd-oldest Japanese animated film known to exist and obviously a very early prototype of what anime would one day become, and I will attempt to judge... it within the context that it was made, not compare it to later anime. The plot itself is an engaging one - a simple story of a fisherman briefly visiting an enchanting undersea world. Modern viewers may find the pace is too rapid to fully understand what is going on, but bear in mind that since this was silent film it was almost certainly preceded by an explanation of the story before the film actually began when it originally aired.Visually, I did not find this film to be very impressive. The backgrounds are overly simple, the characters' design are not very expressive, and some instances of motion don't have enough middle frames to fully convey the motion. Yes, this is only 1918, but I think every one of these aspects was done better by The Dull Blade, an even earlier Japanese animation film from the year prior, or in Urashima Tarou's western contemporaries such as The Sinking of the Lusitania. All that being said, Urashima Tarou is decently animated, better than many other short animation films from the same period. I feel that it ranks just below average for its era in terms of quality and novelty. Reviewer’s Rating: 4 What did you think of this review? Nice0 Love it0 Funny0 Confusing0 Informative0 Well-written0 Creative0Show all Interest Stacks Recommendations Recent NewsRecent Forum DiscussionRecent Featured Articles
Alternative TitlesJapanese: 浦島太郎Information Episodes: 1 Status: Finished Airing Aired: Feb 1, 1918 Source: Other Duration: 1 min. Rating: G - All Ages Statistics Score: 4.691 (scored by 18571,857 users) Ranked: #1379922 based on the top anime page. Please note that 'Not yet aired' and 'R18+' titles are excluded. Popularity: #10471 Members: 3,274 Favorites: 1 Resources
Feb 13, 2019 Having accidentally seen the 1931 version, I finally came upon the real, 1918 version, and as a fan of very antiquated things, I loved it!Though from the silent era, when animation was less about even using cell, which had not really come around yet even in america, and simply about what seemingly amounted to motion capturing different pictures- frame, after frame, after frame.BUt growing up with claymation shows as a child, I dont hate this.ON my quest to see much anime, I of course could not pass up any of the oldest still available to watch, and I encourage others to not pass up the... opportunity to watch this near ancient piece.Though lacking in aesthetics, it was funny to see the way the animators created the illusions of aquatic life underneath our fisherman protagonist, as well as the scenes underneath the sea itself.Oddly enough, the whole backdrop was red colored, either due to the fragility and damage over time done to the original stills or thats just how twas back than. NANDA TO?! O>oSupposedly filmed and/ or hand drawn by people at a japanese company listed at the films end, called Y.N .& Co., there is a picute of a young gal point to japanese words that, maybe, say "thanks for watching" but I could not tell. Also there is a backwards 87, likely the number of frames of single pictures that made up this historic gem. I though it was funny to see the protagonist end up old, like he had spent too much time or all his life nearly underwater be the films end, which made me chuckle at how much old things remind us that people have always been people, now and forevermore. Give it a watch at :http://animation.filmarchives.jp/works/play/72126 Reviewer’s Rating: 7 What did you think of this review? Nice
0 Love it
0 Funny
0 Confusing
0 Informative
0 Well-written
0 Creative
0Show all 
Apr 2, 2021 English Version: Unfortunately there are people who still confuse this 1918 animation with other versions, but it is easy to find the original version that has only 1 minuteIt's kind of confusing because it's 1 minute, but you can easily understand the storyThe art is black and white (which is common in old films) and sometimes blinks and there are flashes of light that leave everything white, except that it is good for the timeAnd it plays a nice little song to listen to and very beautifulThe characters are seen in a rush for having 1 minute, the short shows very well the kindness of... the boyAnd this is what I think about Urashima TarouGoodbye!Versão em Português: Infelizmente tem pessoas que confundem ainda essa animação de 1918 com outras versões, mas é fácil achar a versão original que possui apenas 1 minutoÉ meio confusa por ser de 1 minuto, mesmo assim deu pra entender a história facilmenteA arte é preto e branco ( oque é comum em filmes antigos) e as vezes pisca e tem uns flashes de luz que deixa tudo branco, tirando isso é boa para épocaE toca uma musiquinha boa de se ouvir e muito bonitaOs personagens são vistos de forma corrida por ter 1 minuto, o curta mostra muito bem a bondade do meninoE foi isso que eu acho sobre Urashima TarouTchau! Reviewer’s Rating: 6 What did you think of this review? Nice
Apr 4, 2017 First of all, please note that there are multiple versions of Urashima Taro. This MAL entry is for the 1918 silent short film, and it is only about 60 seconds long. If you are watching a version with narration, with any sort of sound, or that is longer than a minute (as I suspect the other review here was) this is the wrong MAL page. With that out of the way, Urashima Tarou is (as of this writing) the 3rd-oldest Japanese animated film known to exist and obviously a very early prototype of what anime would one day become, and I will attempt to judge... it within the context that it was made, not compare it to later anime. The plot itself is an engaging one - a simple story of a fisherman briefly visiting an enchanting undersea world. Modern viewers may find the pace is too rapid to fully understand what is going on, but bear in mind that since this was silent film it was almost certainly preceded by an explanation of the story before the film actually began when it originally aired.Visually, I did not find this film to be very impressive. The backgrounds are overly simple, the characters' design are not very expressive, and some instances of motion don't have enough middle frames to fully convey the motion. Yes, this is only 1918, but I think every one of these aspects was done better by The Dull Blade, an even earlier Japanese animation film from the year prior, or in Urashima Tarou's western contemporaries such as The Sinking of the Lusitania. All that being said, Urashima Tarou is decently animated, better than many other short animation films from the same period. I feel that it ranks just below average for its era in terms of quality and novelty. Reviewer’s Rating: 4 What did you think of this review? Nice