Genetically-defined metabolic reprogramming in cancer (original) (raw)
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2012 Jul 31;23(11):552–559. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2012.06.009
Abstract
Oncogenes and tumor suppressors regulate cell metabolism. Evidence demonstrates that tumorigenic mutations in these genes tend to orchestrate metabolic activity into a platform that promotes cell survival, growth and proliferation. Recent work has shown that some metabolic enzymes are also mutated in cancer, and that these mutations may influence malignancy directly. Thus, these enzymes seem to function as oncogenes and tumor suppressors, and would appear to be compelling targets for therapy. Here, we review several enzymes mutated in cancer – phosphoglycerate dehydrogenase, isocitrate dehydrogenases 1 and 2, succinate dehydrogenase, and fumarate hydratase – and discuss exciting new work that has begun to pull back the curtain on how mutations in these enzymes influence tumorigenesis.
Genomic alteration of metabolic enzymes in cancer
Cancer is a genetic disease caused primarily by mutations in oncogenes and tumor suppressors. These two classes of genes normally regulate tissue homeostasis, and their perturbed function in cancer causes unwarranted cell survival and growth, culminating in tumorigenesis. Tumors often display oncogene-activating genomic alterations such as gene amplification and gain-of-function point mutations, and/or tumor-suppressor inactivating mutations such as gene deletion, loss-of-function point mutations, or epigenetic silencing. Together, these mutations enable cells to acquire the stereotypical capabilities (“hallmarks”) of malignancy [1]. Over the past decade, a large body of work has demonstrated that most if not all oncogenes and tumor suppressors also regulate metabolism, so that mutations in these genes orchestrate nutrient utilization in a manner that facilitates cell survival and growth. Common metabolic effects of tumorigenic mutations include activation of aerobic glycolysis (the “Warburg effect”, see Box 1 and Glossary), glutaminolysis, and anaplerosis, which collaborate to produce energy and macromolecular precursors needed to produce lipids, nucleic acids, and proteins for dividing cells (Box 1) [2, 3]. In experimental systems, blockade of these metabolic activities has been demonstrated to suppress tumor cell growth in culture and in vivo. Thus, deregulated cell metabolism is now considered a hallmark of malignancy and an essential effect of tumorigenic mutations [4]. The metabolic effects of oncogenes and tumor suppressors have been extensively reviewed elsewhere [5, 6].
Text Box 1. Major oncogene-regulated metabolic pathways in cancer.
Starting in the 1920s, Otto Warburg demonstrated high rates of glucose consumption and lactate secretion in tumor tissue, even when the tissue had access to abundant oxygen [67]. Aerobic glycolysis, or the “Warburg effect,” is the most frequently cited metabolic feature of cancer cells, and is stimulated by a large number of oncogenes. Other metabolic pathways stimulated by oncogenes and cited as components of tumor metabolism include glutamine catabolism (glutaminolysis); de novo synthesis of fatty acids and lipids; and anaplerosis, pathways that enable the TCA cycle to provide biosynthetic precursors. These pathways tend to occur concurrently in cancer cells, providing a platform that supports rapid cell growth and proliferation [68].
Remarkably, in some situations, metabolic enzymes independently function as oncogenes or tumor suppressors, suggesting that primary metabolic disturbances can drive cells towards a malignant phenotype, or at least facilitate tumorigenesis [7]. Genes encoding these enzymes are mutated in the genome just like traditional tumor suppressors and oncogenes. Tumors harboring these metabolic mutations have generated a tremendous amount of interest over the past few years. They are both interesting and important, because cells derived from these tumors display metabolic activities that differ significantly, in some cases profoundly, from that of normal tissue. Understanding these perturbed metabolic networks may shed light on the biological basis of malignancy, and may enable the development of therapies based on selective targeting of tumor metabolism [8]. Here, we review several metabolic enzymes that are mutated in human cancer, and discuss efforts to understand why these mutations appear to facilitate tumorigenesis.
Phosphoglycerate Dehydrogenase (PHGDH) – An enzyme commonly amplified in human tumors
Serine and glycine are nonessential amino acids that serve as intermediates in numerous metabolic pathways (Figure 1). Both are relatively abundant in human plasma, typically exceeding 100 μmol/L, and many cancer cells can avidly import them from the culture medium. Nevertheless, a significant fraction of human cancer cells appear to rely on de novo synthesis of these two amino acids [9, 10]. This pathway begins with the oxidation of a glycolytic intermediate, 3-phosphoglycerate (3PG), to 3-phospho-hydroxypyruvate (3POHPyr) by the enzyme phosphoglycerate dehydrogenase (PHDGH). Transamination of 3POHpyr by phosphoserine aminotransferase-1 (PSAT1) generates phosphoserine, which is then converted to serine. Serine may donate a methyl group to the cellular one-carbon pool, and in doing so is converted to glycine. Together, both serine and glycine feed a large number of metabolic pathways that support cell survival and growth (Figure 1). Genomic amplification of the PHGDH gene on chromosome 1p12 occurs in some 16% of human cancers, including 40% of melanomas and 6% of breast cancers, and an even larger fraction of tumors display enhanced expression of this enzyme, regardless of copy number gain [9, 10]. Silencing PHGDH in human tumor cell lines with high levels of expression limits their growth in culture and in mouse models of cancer, identifying PHGDH as a potential therapeutic target in tumors leveraged towards de novo serine biosynthesis.
Figure 1. Phosphoglycerate dehydrogenase is over-expressed in some cancers and catalyzes a growth-promoting metabolic pathway.
Glycolytic cancer cells convert glucose into pyruvate, which can then be oxidized in the mitochondria or converted into lactate. Cells containing enhanced expression of the enzyme phosphoglycerate dehydrogenase (PHGDH), either as the result of genomic amplification of its gene on chromosome 1p12 or through other mechanisms, divert 3-phosphoglycerate (3-PG) away from glycolysis into the serine/glycine biosynthetic pathway (red arrows), which generates a number of important metabolic intermediates. Along this pathway, transamination of 3-phospho-hydroxypyruvate (3-POHpyr) by the enzyme phosphoserine aminotransferase-1 (PSAT1) generates α-ketoglutarate (α-KG), which can then be oxidized in the tricarboxylic acid cycle (TCA). Serine and glycine are used to produce glutathione, proteins, nucleic acids, phospholipids and sphingolipids, and other molecules required for cell growth and proliferation. Abbreviations: Ac-coA, acetyl-coA; Cit, citrate; Isocit, isocitrate; Succ, succinate; Fum, fumarate; Mal, malate; OAA, oxaloacetate; NAD, nicotine adenine dinucleotide.
An accelerated flux through the serine biosynthetic pathway may provide a number of advantages for growing cancer cells, perhaps contributing to oncogenesis. First, serine is required as a precursor for the biosynthesis of lipids, proteins, nucleotides and amino acids [11, 12]. Thus, the ability to replenish the serine and glycine pools may allow cells to survive the stress associated with the aberrant activation of oncogenes, which in some contexts may reduce nucleotide availability [13]. Oncogenes also induce production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which stimulate cellular senescence, unless cells are armed with robust antioxidant defense systems [14]. Cells may capitalize on enhanced serine/glycine biosynthesis to help mitigate this stress, because glycine is a precursor for the major antioxidant glutathione [15].
Interestingly, while silencing PHGDH may suppress cancer cell growth, it does not necessarily do so simply by limiting intracellular serine/glycine. Possemato et al. found that cells with high PHGDH activity also use this pathway to produce up to 50% of their α-ketoglutarate supply [10]. α-ketoglutarate is produced by PSAT1 as it transfers an amino group from glutamine derived-glutamate to 3POHPyr. α-ketoglutarate is a crucial intermediate in cancer cells, because it can be metabolized in the mitochondria to generate ATP, and to feed pools of TCA cycle intermediates, many of which serve as macromolecular precursors [16]. Cancer cells, at least in culture, express a number of other highly-active transaminases, including alanine aminotransferase (glutamic-pyruvic transaminase) and aspartate aminotransferase (glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase). These other transaminases, rather than PSAT1, often account for the majority of glutamine-derived α-ketoglutarate in human cancer cells [17]. Thus, it will be interesting to determine why a subset of cancer cells seem to use PSAT1 as the preferred source of α-ketoglutarate, or whether serine biosynthesis provides other metabolic advantages yet to be uncovered in these cells.
Beyond orchestrating a growth-promoting metabolic phenotype, evidence also suggests that PHGDH, when expressed at high levels, may have properties that prime cells for transformation. Over-expression of catalytically active PHGDH, but not a hypomorphic mutant, in breast epithelial cells induces luminal filling, abnormal nuclear morphology, anchorage-independence and disturbed cell polarity [9]. All of these changes are associated with cellular transformation, suggesting that PHGDH over-expression enhances the acquisition of malignant properties.
Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2: Point mutations create a neomorphic enzyme activity and production of an “oncometabolite”
Isocitrate dehydrogenases (IDH) serve important roles in normal cell metabolism and growth (Figure 2) [18]. These enzymes catalyze the oxidative decarboxylation of isocitrate to α-ketoglutarate and are distinguishable from one another based on sub-cellular localization and cofactor preference. IDH3 is a multi-subunit enzyme that is localized within the mitochondrial matrix, and uses NAD+ as a cofactor in an irreversible reaction that generates α-ketoglutarate in the TCA cycle. IDH1 and IDH2, which share no sequence similarity with IDH3, use NADP+ as a cofactor in reversible reactions that occur in the cytoplasm and mitochondria, respectively [19].
Figure 2. Mutant IDH1/2 enzymes produce an oncometabolite with pleiotropic effects on cell signaling and epigenetics.
Normal cells contain wild type IDH1 and IDH2 (gray). These enzymes catalyze the reversible conversion of isocitrate to α-ketoglutarate (α-KG), generating NADPH and CO2.. α-KG can be oxidized in the TCA or used as a cofactor by α-KG-dependent dioxygenase enzymes. Tumor cells with somatically-acquired, heterozygous active site mutations in IDH1 or IDH2 (mIDH1/2, green) display a neomorphic enzyme activity that reduces α-KG to R(−)-2-hydroxyglutarate ((R)-2HG), using NADPH as a cofactor. Due to its structural similarity to α-KG, (R)-2HG modulates the function of α-KG-dependent dioxygenases, stimulating prolyl hydroxylase activity and inhibiting a number of enzymes that regulate histone and DNA modifications. Together, these processes exert complex effects on gene expression that likely contribute to the malignancy of _IDH1/2_-mutant cells.
In 2008, genome-sequencing efforts in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) led to the surprising observation that a subset of these aggressive brain tumors contains mutations in IDH1 [20]. IDH1 mutations were preferentially observed in young patients with secondary GBM, i.e. with aggressive gliomas that had arisen from lower-grade, slowly-growing tumors. A follow-up study examining more than 400 central nervous system tumors determined that some 70% of secondary GBM or World Health Organization Grade II and III astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas contained IDH1 mutations, and other tumors from these groups had mutations in IDH2 [21]. In both studies, the median survival of patients with _IDH_-mutant tumors was more than double that of patients lacking these mutations. Subsequently, IDH1 and IDH2 mutations were also found in other cancers, including acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and chondrosarcoma [21–24].
Although these IDH1 and IDH2 mutations inactivate the canonical, NADPH-producing activity of these enzymes [21], several pieces of evidence argued against the concept that IDH1 and IDH2 are tumor suppressors. First, in human gliomas, all mutations were somatically acquired. Second, the tumor-associated mutations were restricted to the isocitrate binding site, and overtly inactivating mutations like frame shifts or stop codons were not observed. Third, only one IDH1 or IDH2 mutation was identified in each tumor, with retention of one wild-type allele and no loss of heterozygosity. All of these observations argue against a simple loss-of-function model, and suggest that the mutant IDH alleles had acquired a new activity that promotes tumor formation. Indeed, a metabolomic analysis of human GBM cells engineered to over-express mutant IDH1, identified large amounts of R(−)-2-hydroxyglutarate ((R)-2HG), the reduced form of α-ketoglutarate [25] (Figure 2). This metabolite was also abundant in human tumors with mutant IDH1, but not wild-type IDH1, and in vitro studies revealed that the mutant allele possesses a neomorphic enzyme activity that enables it to convertα-ketoglutarate directly to (R)-2HG in the presence of NADPH [25]. Mutations in IDH2 also produce (R)-2HG from α-ketoglutarate and result in 2HG accumulation in primary human AML samples [26].
2HG is a compelling metabolite in human disease. Both of its enantiomers, (R)-2HG and (S)-2HG (also known as D-2HG and L-2HG) were previously observed to accumulate in rare, autosomal recessive metabolic disorders caused by loss of the dehydrogenases that convert these metabolites to α-ketoglutarate, D-2HG-dehydrogenase (D2HGDH) and L-2HG-dehydrogenase (L2HGDH) [27]. Children with homozygous mutations in L2HGDH accumulate (S)-2HG, but not (R)-2HG, in all body fluids, starting in childhood or earlier. The main clinical features of L2HGDH deficiency are developmental delay, seizures, ataxia, and abnormalities of the white matter and basal ganglia. Several of these children have also developed tumors, particularly in the brain, raising the possibility that (S)-2HG contributes to oncogenesis [27]. Children with homozygous mutations in D2HGDH accumulate (R)-2HG, but not (S)-2HG, starting in early in life, and these patients develop a syndrome of developmental delay, hypotonia, and seizures. Germline, monoallelic gain-of-function IDH2 mutations, similar to those observed in gliomas, were recently identified in a subset of children systemic elevations of (R)-2HG [28]. These children display phenotypic overlap with D2HGDH deficiency, and approximately half of them also develop cardiomyopathy [27]. Interestingly, despite the fact that (R)-2HG accumulates in tumors with monoallelic, somatically-acquired IDH1 and IDH2 mutations, neither systemic D2HGDH deficiency nor germline IDH2 mutations have so far been associated with cancer [29]. This seems to suggest that (R)-2HG is a context-specific “oncometabolite,” perhaps requiring exposure to susceptible cell types and/or a permissive developmental state to elicit malignancy.
The specific mechanisms for (R)-2HG’s putative transforming properties are now the subject of intense study. Due to its close structural similarity to α-ketoglutarate, (R)-2HG modulates the activity of many enzymes that use α-ketoglutarate as a substrate. These include the α-ketoglutarate-dependent dioxygenases, which comprise a large family of enzymes that carry out diverse functions such as prolyl hydroxylation, histone demethylation and epigenetic modification of DNA (Figure 2) [30, 31]. In gliomas, (R)-2HG produced by mutant IDH1 substantially and stably alters the DNA methylome and is sufficient to establish the CpG island methylator phenotype, which defines a clinically distinct subset of tumors [32]. Enhanced DNA methylation and epigenetic remodeling is also common in AML, where it frequently occurs through deletion of the 5-methylcytosine hydroxylase TET2, another α-ketoglutarate-dependent enzyme [33]. AML samples with IDH1/2 mutations exhibit a similar hypermethylation phenotype, yet these mutations are mutually exclusive with TET2 mutations [34]. Transient transfection of mutant IDH1/2 was sufficient to inhibit TET2 function in cultured cells, suggesting that (R)-2HG-producing IDH1/2 mutations are functionally redundant with inactivating TET2 mutations [31]. Expression of these mutations also impairs differentiation of primary mouse bone marrow cells [34] and suppresses histone demethylation and adipocyte differentiation in culture [35]. Together, these observations suggest that (R)-2HG-producing IDH1/2 mutations promote malignancy by remodeling the epigenetic landscape in a way that arrests cellular differentiation.
(R)-2HG also modulates the activity of the hypoxia-inducible transcription factors (HIFs) by altering the stability of their α-subunits. These subunits (HIF-1α and HIF-2α) are normally targeted for degradation in the presence of oxygen, through post-translational modifications, particularly by the EGLN family of prolyl hydroxylases. At low millimolar levels similar to those found in _IDH1/2_-mutant gliomas, (R)-2HG selectively enhances prolyl hydroxylase activity in vitro by acting as a co-substrate for the enzyme [36]. This is associated with enhanced degradation of HIF-α subunits in cell lines expressing IDH1 mutations, and with blunted expression of HIF target genes in _IDH1/2_-mutant gliomas [36]. Because EGLN expression was required for maximal proliferation of IDH1-mutant cells in culture, the findings suggest that (R)-2HG supports a program of cell growth.
Work on IDH1/2 mutations in cancer has revealed a system in which a primary metabolic disturbance elicits non-metabolic effects that promote malignancy. It is unclear whether suppressing (R)-2HG formation in tumors will reverse these effects. However, the relatively favorable prognosis in gliomas with IDH1/2 mutations emphasizes the prognostic utility of detecting (R)-2HG in tumors. Indeed, methods to image (R)-2HG non-invasively in human cancer patients by magnetic resonance spectroscopy have already been reported, and will likely disseminate rapidly into routine clinical practice [37–40].
Succinate Dehydrogenase and Fumarate Hydratase: TCA cycle enzymes and tumor suppressors
Succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) and fumarate hydratase (FH) catalyze sequential steps within the TCA cycle and are mutated in human tumors (Figure 3A). SDH is a multi-subunit complex that also functions as Complex II of the electron transport chain (ETC). SDH oxidizes succinate in a reaction that generates fumarate and FADH2, and donates electrons to the ETC [41]. Mutations in genes encoding SDH subunits were identified in familial forms of the neuroendocrine tumors pheochromocytoma (PCC) and paraganglioma (PGL) [42–45]. Affected individuals inherit a loss of function mutation in one allele of a gene encoding an SDH subunit, and their tumors display loss of expression of the other allele, through somatic deletion or other mechanisms. Thus, these genes follow the typical inheritance pattern of tumor suppressors. In some of these tumor types, penetrance depends on the parent from whom the germline mutation is inherited. For cases of PGL caused by mutations in SDHD, only paternally-acquired mutations are associated with tumors, suggesting that the maternally-inherited allele is imprinted [46]. Interestingly, while SDHD itself shows no direct evidence of methylation, boundary elements, including the alternative promoter of a large intergenic non-coding RNA (lincRNA), are heavily methylated on the maternally-inherited allele [47]. Furthermore, this region displays tissue-specific methylation, particularly in the adrenal glands, the anatomic site of PCC. This may provide an explanation both for the inheritance pattern and for the tumor type in this disease.
Figure 3. Effects of mutation of TCA cycle enzymes on metabolism and gene expression.
(A) Succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) and fumarate hydratase (FH) are TCA cycle enzymes and tumor suppressors. In normal cells, succinate and fumarate are generated through oxidative metabolism of glutamine-derived α-KG (gray arrows). Subsequent metabolism around the TCA cycle generates citrate for lipid synthesis. SDH and FH deficiency interrupt this pathway, with accumulation of succinate and fumarate, respectively. FH-deficient cells redirect TCA cycle metabolism in two ways (red arrows). First, the cells shunt succinyl-CoA into a pathway of heme biosynthesis and degradation, culminating in the secretion of bilirubin. Inhibiting Heme Oxygenase-1 (HMOX1) in this pathway selectively kills cells with FH deficiency. Second, in order to produce citrate, the cells use reductive carboxylation of glutamine-derived α-KG. IDH1 and/or IDH2 participate in this reaction, and subsequent metabolism of citrate produces acetyl-CoA for fatty acid/lipid synthesis, and other TCA cycle intermediates like oxaloacetate and malate, which are normally produced downstream of FH. (B) Keap1 is an electrophile sensor. In the absence of fumarate and other electrophiles, Keap1 negatively regulates the transcription factor Nrf2, targeting it for degradation. In FH-deficient cells, cysteine residues on Keap1 are modified by fumarate-dependent succination, in which cysteine is converted to S-(2-succinyl)-cysteine. Nrf2, now active, can activate the transcription of genes involved in the antioxidant response. Abbreviations: Ac-CoA, acetyl-CoA; Succ-CoA, succinyl-CoA; OAA, oxaloacetate; HMOX1, heme oxygenase-1; IDH1/2, isocitrate dehydrogenase isoforms 1 and 2; Cys, cysteine.
Fumarate hydratase is a TCA cycle enzyme that catalyzes the hydration of fumarate to malate. Biallelic germline FH mutations cause a rare metabolic disorder characterized by severe encephalopathy and mental retardation [48]. In 2002, it was discovered that heterozygous mutations in FH underlie a familial syndrome of benign leiomyomas of the skin and uterus, and highly aggressive renal tumors, termed hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell cancer (HLRCC) [49]. As in the familial forms of PCC and PGL, individuals with HLRCC inherit one loss of function allele and somatically lose the other allele in the tumors. The inherited FH mutations severely reduce enzyme activity, causing the tumors to accumulate high levels of fumarate [50].
The overtly-dysfunctional TCA cycles of FH- and SDH-deficient tumors present significant metabolic challenges, because the TCA cycle is a central pathway for energy formation and for the production of macromolecular precursors. Several lines of investigation have revealed mechanisms by which cells cope with this problem. First, succinate and fumarate function in a feed-forward system to allow cells to up-regulate glycolytic activity, which allows them to produce ATP independently of the TCA cycle. Both fumarate and succinate inhibit α-ketoglutarate-dependent prolyl hydroxylases, resulting in the normoxic stabilization of HIF-αsubunits and constitutive expression of HIF transcriptional targets, particularly glycolytic genes, in human cells [51, 52]. Second, the survival of FH-deficient murine kidney cells requires the induction of linked metabolic activities, heme biosynthesis and degradation, that remove some of the excess carbon from the dysfunctional TCA cycle and generate reducing equivalents in the form of NADH (Figure 3) [53]. Silencing one of the enzymes in this pathway, heme oxygenase-1 (HMOX1), using RNA interference or a chemical inhibitor, kills FH-deficient human and mouse kidney cells in culture, but is well tolerated by cells expressing wild-type FH [53].
Third, FH deficiency precludes tumor cells from generating several of the TCA cycle intermediates through conventional oxidative metabolism. These include malate, a source of NADPH for redox homeostasis; oxaloacetate, a precursor for nucleotide biosynthesis; and citrate, the primary source of acetyl-coA for de novo fatty acid synthesis [15, 16]. To compensate for this, human FH-deficient renal tumor cells redirect part of the TCA cycle. Rather than using IDH as an oxidative decarboxylase to convert isocitrate to α-ketoglutarate, they carboxylate α-ketoglutarate to produce isocitrate. This reaction, called reductive carboxylation, uses NADPH-dependent IDH isoforms, and consumes glutamine-derived α-ketoglutarate. Subsequent metabolism of isocitrate generates citrate, which is then cleaved to produce oxaloacetate and acetyl-CoA. This acetyl-CoA pool is the major source of carbon for fatty acid synthesis, while the oxaloacetate is reduced to form malate, thus “back-filling” the pools of TCA cycle intermediates impaired by FH deficiency (Figure 3A). This pathway of glutamine-dependent reductive carboxylation appears to be a robust mechanism allowing cells to maintain growth during impaired oxidative metabolism, because it is also observed in human cancer cells lines with mutations in the ETC or in the Von-Hippel-Lindau (VHL) tumor suppressor, and in cells subjected to hypoxia, all of which negatively impact oxygen-dependent mitochondrial enzymes [54–57].
Finally, high levels of fumarate and succinate can induce aberrant patterns of gene expression. Succinate inhibits the histone demethylase JMJD3, leading to a global increase in steady state histone methylation [58]. Succinate inhibition of the EGLN3 prolyl hydroxylase leads to a suppression of neuronal apoptosis in PGL and PCC tumors [59, 60]. As a result of its electrophilic properties, fumarate modifies cysteine residues on cellular proteins, producing an S-(2-Succinyl)cysteine (2SC) adduct in a Michael addition reaction called succination [61]. Succination has been reported to impair protein function. For example, Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1 (Keap1) is a major cellular electrophile sensor and negative regulator of the transcription factor Nuclear Factor E2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) (Figure 3B). In the absence of electrophiles, Keap1 targets Nrf2 for ubiquitination and degradation. In the presence of electrophiles, the Keap1-Nrf2 complex is disrupted, and Nrf2 induces expression of a suite of genes involved in antioxidant defense. In cells with FH deficiency, fumarate-mediated succination of Keap1 elicits an Nrf2 response, maintaining constitutively high expression of Nrf2 targets [62–64]. Interestingly, one of these targets is HMOX1, which encodes the enzyme required for heme degradation in FH-deficient cells, suggesting that fumarate-dependent suppression of Keap1 may promote cell survival. It is unclear what role the Keap1/Nrf2 system plays in tumorigenesis generally, but several lines of evidence suggest that it promotes tumor formation and/or growth. Keap1 mutations are frequently observed in solid human tumors, leading to the proposal that it functions as a tumor suppressor [65]. Furthermore, ablation of the NRF2 gene reduces tumor formation in an oncogenic KRAS mouse model [66]. Thus, fumarate-mediated suppression of Keap1 may contribute to tumor development in the setting of FH deficiency.
Concluding Remarks
In some forms of cancer, metabolic enzymes are altered by the same mutational mechanisms observed in classical oncogenes and tumor suppressors: genomic amplification, activating mutations, and loss-of-function mutations. All of these metabolic mutations reprogram cellular metabolism in ways that either prime cells for transformation or otherwise contribute to oncogenesis. In the case of PHDGH, a metabolic activity is enhanced via genomic amplification, supporting cell growth and perhaps stimulating the development of malignant properties. Active-site mutations in IDH1/2 induce a neomorphic enzyme activity, eliciting epigenetic effects that would have been impossible to predict solely from the primary metabolic disturbance. SDH and FH function genetically as classical tumor suppressors despite the expectation that loss of these enzyme activities should severely impair cellular fitness. While nearly a century of research in cancer metabolism has focused on the enhancement of core metabolic pathways (glycolysis, glutaminolysis, lipid synthesis, etc.) in aggressive tumors, these recently-discovered metabolic outliers may provide unique opportunities to understand why particular metabolic changes lead to cancer in a tissue-specific manner (Box 2). In order to solve this problem, it will be necessary to understand how metabolic perturbations influence processes beyond bioenergetics, energy storage, and macromolecular synthesis, the traditional roles of metabolism, and support the hallmarks of malignancy. Tumors with primary metabolic disturbances should also hold significant potential in translational studies. Diagnostic imaging of abundant metabolites is already possible in gliomas containing (R)-2HG, and may be possible for fumarate and succinate as well. Importantly, the significant departures from normal metabolism described in these tumors may widen the therapeutic window for treatments designed to attack the mutant pathways, enabling selective toxicity to be achieved in the tumor cells.
Text Box 2. Outstanding questions.
- Do mutations in other metabolic enzymes besides the ones discussed here occur in human cancer?
- Are mutations in other tumor suppressors and oncogenes, acting in concert with mutations in metabolic enzymes, required for malignant transformation? Are there any contexts in which metabolic mutations are sufficient for oncogenesis?
- Are there other extra-metabolic roles of (R)-2HG, succinate and fumarate that contribute to malignant transformation and tumor growth?
- What are the mechanisms that restrict tumor development to specific organs following enzyme mutations?
- How well does the abundant information on the metabolism of cultured cancer cells –acquired over many decades – correlate with bona fide metabolism of live tumors growing in their native microenvironment in vivo?
- Would reversion of tumor metabolism to “normal” pathways impair tumor growth, cause tumor regression, or stimulate other therapeutically useful effects?
Acknowledgments
A.R.M. is supported by the N.I.H. Training Grant 5T32GM083831. R.J.D. is supported by grants from the N.I.H. (CA157996), the Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (HIRP100437 and RP101243), the Robert A. Welch Foundation (I-1733) and the Damon-Runyon Cancer Research Foundation.
Glossary
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML)
a cancer of the myeloid line of blood cells and the most common acute leukemia in adults
Chondrosarcoma
a cartilage-forming cancer of the bone
Fumarate hydratase (FH)
TCA cycle enzyme that converts fumarate to malate. Mutations in FH are observed in families with HLRCC (see above). In individuals with this disorder, one mutated allele of FH is inherited, and expression of the other allele is lost in the tumor, demonstrating that FH functions as a tumor suppressor in this disease
Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM)
the most common and aggressive malignant primary brain tumor in humans
Hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell cancer (HLRCC)
a rare cancer syndrome characterized by benign smooth muscle tumors and aggressive collecting duct or Type 2 papillary renal cell carcinoma
Isocitrate dehydrogenases (IDH)
These enzymes catalyze the conversion of isocitrate to α-ketoglutarate. Low-grade gliomas, acute myelogenous leukemias, chondrosarcomas and other human tumors contain somatically-acquired mutations in either of two IDH isoforms, IDH1 or IDH2. IDH1 and IDH2 are considered to be oncogenes in these tumors. However, unlike most oncogenes, mutations in IDH1 and IDH2 do not simply accentuate their canonical enzyme activity; rather mutant forms of IDH1 and IDH2 acquire the ability to produce an oncometabolite, R(−)-2-hydroxyglutarate (see below), from α-ketoglutarate
Phosphoglycerate dehydrogenase (PHGDH)
An enzyme involved in the de novo synthesis of serine from glucose. It converts a glycolytic intermediate, 3-phosphoglycerate, to 3-phospho-hydroxypyruvate. PHGDH protein is highly expressed in a substantial fraction of human cancers, and amplification of the PHGDH gene on chromosome 1p12 accounts for many of these. PHGDH is considered a therapeutic target in cancer, because some tumor cells displaying high flux through the pathway of de novo serine biosynthesis require PHGDH for growth in culture and in vivo
Pheochromocytoma (PCC)
a rare neuroendocrine tumor of the adrenal gland, often secreting excessive amounts of catecholamines
Paraganglioma (PGL)
a rare, generally benign neuroendocrine tumor that may develop in the head, neck, thorax and abdomen
Reductive carboxylation
Enzymatic reaction in which α-ketoglutarate, usually generated from glutamine catabolism, is carboxylated in the presence of CO2 and NADPH, to produce isocitrate. This reaction enables cells to maintain production of TCA cycle metabolites even when function of the cycle is severely impaired by FH deficiency or other processes
R(−)-2-hydroxyglutarate ((R)-2HG)
An “oncometabolite” produced via the neomorphic enzyme activity of mutant IDH1 and IDH2. The metabolite results from the NADPH-dependent reduction of α-ketoglutarate. Tumors with IDH1 or IDH2 mutations may accumulate (R)-2HG to levels of several millimoles/L. (R)-2HG alters the function of a large number of enzymes that use α-ketoglutarate as a substrate, and these effects are implicated in the oncogenic potential of mutant IDH1 and IDH2
Succinate dehydrogenase (SDH)
Tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle enzyme that converts succinate to fumarate, and also functions as complex II of the electron transport chain. SDH consists of four structural subunits, all encoded by genes in the nuclear genome. Mutations in any of these genes, or in a gene encoding an assembly factor for the complex, can be observed in patients with paraganglioma and pheochromocytoma. In individuals with familial forms of these diseases, the inheritance pattern demonstrates that SDH is a tumor suppressor
Warburg effect
a metabolic phenomenon characterized by high rates of glucose consumption and lactate secretion in the presence of oxygen. Named for the German biochemist Otto Warburg
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- 1.Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. The hallmarks of cancer. Cell. 2000;100:57–70. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81683-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Cairns RA, et al. Regulation of cancer cell metabolism. Nature reviews Cancer. 2011;11:85–95. doi: 10.1038/nrc2981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Vander Heiden MG, et al. Understanding the Warburg effect: the metabolic requirements of cell proliferation. Science. 2009;324:1029–1033. doi: 10.1126/science.1160809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011;144:646–674. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.DeBerardinis RJ. Is cancer a disease of abnormal cellular metabolism? New angles on an old idea. Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics. 2008;10:767–777. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e31818b0d9b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Maddocks OD, Vousden KH. Metabolic regulation by p53. J Mol Med (Berl) 2011;89:237–245. doi: 10.1007/s00109-011-0735-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Thompson CB. Metabolic Enzymes as Oncogenes or Tumor Suppressors. New England Journal of Medicine. 2009;360:813–815. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe0810213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.DeBerardinis RJ, Thompson CB. Cellular metabolism and disease: what do metabolic outliers teach us? Cell. 2012;148:1132–1144. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.02.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Locasale JW, et al. Phosphoglycerate dehydrogenase diverts glycolytic flux and contributes to oncogenesis. Nature genetics. 2011;43:869–874. doi: 10.1038/ng.890. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Possemato R, et al. Functional genomics reveal that the serine synthesis pathway is essential in breast cancer. Nature. 2011;476:346–350. doi: 10.1038/nature10350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Nikiforov MA, et al. A functional screen for Myc-responsive genes reveals serine hydroxymethyltransferase, a major source of the one-carbon unit for cell metabolism. Molecular and cellular biology. 2002;22:5793–5800. doi: 10.1128/MCB.22.16.5793-5800.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Pollari S, et al. Enhanced serine production by bone metastatic breast cancer cells stimulates osteoclastogenesis. Breast cancer research and treatment. 2011;125:421–430. doi: 10.1007/s10549-010-0848-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bester AC, et al. Nucleotide deficiency promotes genomic instability in early stages of cancer development. Cell. 2011;145:435–446. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.03.044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Moiseeva O, et al. DNA damage signaling and p53-dependent senescence after prolonged beta-interferon stimulation. Molecular biology of the cell. 2006;17:1583–1592. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E05-09-0858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Shanware NP, et al. Glutamine: pleiotropic roles in tumor growth and stress resistance. J Mol Med (Berl) 2011;89:229–236. doi: 10.1007/s00109-011-0731-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.DeBerardinis RJ, Cheng T. Q’s next: the diverse functions of glutamine in metabolism, cell biology and cancer. Oncogene. 2010;29:313–324. doi: 10.1038/onc.2009.358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Yang C, et al. Glioblastoma cells require glutamate dehydrogenase to survive impairments of glucose metabolism or Akt signaling. Cancer research. 2009;69:7986–7993. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-2266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Reitman ZJ, et al. Profiling the effects of isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 mutations on the cellular metabolome. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2011;108:3270–3275. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1019393108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Leonardi R, et al. Cancer-associated Isocitrate Dehydrogenase Mutations Inactivate NADPH-dependent Reductive Carboxylation. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2012;287:14615–14620. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C112.353946. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Parsons DW, et al. An integrated genomic analysis of human glioblastoma multiforme. Science. 2008;321:1807–1812. doi: 10.1126/science.1164382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Yan H, et al. IDH1 and IDH2 mutations in gliomas. The New England journal of medicine. 2009;360:765–773. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0808710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Amary MF, et al. IDH1 and IDH2 mutations are frequent events in central chondrosarcoma and central and periosteal chondromas but not in other mesenchymal tumours. The Journal of pathology. 2011;224:334–343. doi: 10.1002/path.2913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Green A, Beer P. Somatic mutations of IDH1 and IDH2 in the leukemic transformation of myeloproliferative neoplasms. The New England journal of medicine. 2010;362:369–370. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc0910063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Mardis ER, et al. Recurring Mutations Found by Sequencing an Acute Myeloid Leukemia Genome. New England Journal of Medicine. 2009;361:1058–1066. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0903840. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Dang L, et al. Cancer-associated IDH1 mutations produce 2-hydroxyglutarate. Nature. 2009;462:739–744. doi: 10.1038/nature08617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ward PS, et al. The common feature of leukemia-associated IDH1 and IDH2 mutations is a neomorphic enzyme activity converting alpha-ketoglutarate to 2-hydroxyglutarate. Cancer cell. 2010;17:225–234. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2010.01.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kranendijk M, et al. Progress in understanding 2-hydroxyglutaric acidurias. Journal of inherited metabolic disease. 2012 doi: 10.1007/s10545-012-9462-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kranendijk M, et al. IDH2 mutations in patients with D-2-hydroxyglutaric aciduria. Science. 2010;330:336. doi: 10.1126/science.1192632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Struys EA. D-2-Hydroxyglutaric aciduria: unravelling the biochemical pathway and the genetic defect. Journal of inherited metabolic disease. 2006;29:21–29. doi: 10.1007/s10545-006-0317-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Chowdhury R, et al. The oncometabolite 2-hydroxyglutarate inhibits histone lysine demethylases. EMBO reports. 2011;12:463–469. doi: 10.1038/embor.2011.43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Xu W, et al. Oncometabolite 2-hydroxyglutarate is a competitive inhibitor of alpha-ketoglutarate-dependent dioxygenases. Cancer cell. 2011;19:17–30. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2010.12.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Turcan S, et al. IDH1 mutation is sufficient to establish the glioma hypermethylator phenotype. Nature. 2012;483:479–483. doi: 10.1038/nature10866. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Delhommeau F, et al. Mutation in TET2 in myeloid cancers. The New England journal of medicine. 2009;360:2289–2301. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0810069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Figueroa ME, et al. Leukemic IDH1 and IDH2 mutations result in a hypermethylation phenotype, disrupt TET2 function, and impair hematopoietic differentiation. Cancer cell. 2010;18:553–567. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2010.11.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Lu C, et al. IDH mutation impairs histone demethylation and results in a block to cell differentiation. Nature. 2012;483:474–478. doi: 10.1038/nature10860. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Koivunen P, et al. Transformation by the (R)-enantiomer of 2-hydroxyglutarate linked to EGLN activation. Nature. 2012;483:484–488. doi: 10.1038/nature10898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Elkhaled A, et al. Magnetic resonance of 2-hydroxyglutarate in IDH1-mutated low-grade gliomas. Science translational medicine. 2012;4:116ra115. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3002796. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Choi C, et al. 2-hydroxyglutarate detection by magnetic resonance spectroscopy in IDH-mutated patients with gliomas. Nature medicine. 2012;18:624–629. doi: 10.1038/nm.2682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Andronesi OC, et al. Detection of 2-hydroxyglutarate in IDH-mutated glioma patients by in vivo spectral-editing and 2D correlation magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Science translational medicine. 2012;4:116ra114. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3002693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Pope WB, et al. Non-invasive detection of 2-hydroxyglutarate and other metabolites in IDH1 mutant glioma patients using magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Journal of neuro-oncology. 2012;107:197–205. doi: 10.1007/s11060-011-0737-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Raimundo N, et al. Revisiting the TCA cycle: signaling to tumor formation. Trends in molecular medicine. 2011;17:641–649. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2011.06.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Baysal BE, et al. Mutations in SDHD, a mitochondrial complex II gene, in hereditary paraganglioma. Science. 2000;287:848–851. doi: 10.1126/science.287.5454.848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Niemann S, Muller U. Mutations in SDHC cause autosomal dominant paraganglioma, type 3. Nature genetics. 2000;26:268–270. doi: 10.1038/81551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Astuti D, et al. Gene mutations in the succinate dehydrogenase subunit SDHB cause susceptibility to familial pheochromocytoma and to familial paraganglioma. American journal of human genetics. 2001;69:49–54. doi: 10.1086/321282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Hao HX, et al. SDH5, a gene required for flavination of succinate dehydrogenase, is mutated in paraganglioma. Science. 2009;325:1139–1142. doi: 10.1126/science.1175689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Neumann HPH, Erlic Z. Maternal Transmission of Symptomatic Disease with SDHD Mutation: Fact or Fiction? Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2008;93:1573–1575. doi: 10.1210/jc.2008-0569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Baysal BE, et al. Genomic imprinting at a boundary element flanking the SDHD locus. Human molecular genetics. 2011;20:4452–4461. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddr376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Bourgeron T, et al. Mutation of the fumarase gene in two siblings with progressive encephalopathy and fumarase deficiency. The Journal of clinical investigation. 1994;93:2514–2518. doi: 10.1172/JCI117261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Tomlinson IP, et al. Germline mutations in FH predispose to dominantly inherited uterine fibroids, skin leiomyomata and papillary renal cell cancer. Nature genetics. 2002;30:406–410. doi: 10.1038/ng849. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Wei MH, et al. Novel mutations in FH and expansion of the spectrum of phenotypes expressed in families with hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell cancer. Journal of medical genetics. 2006;43:18–27. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2005.033506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Selak MA, et al. Succinate links TCA cycle dysfunction to oncogenesis by inhibiting HIF-alpha prolyl hydroxylase. Cancer cell. 2005;7:77–85. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2004.11.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Isaacs JS, et al. HIF overexpression correlates with biallelic loss of fumarate hydratase in renal cancer: novel role of fumarate in regulation of HIF stability. Cancer cell. 2005;8:143–153. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2005.06.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Frezza C, et al. Haem oxygenase is synthetically lethal with the tumour suppressor fumarate hydratase. Nature. 2011;477:225–228. doi: 10.1038/nature10363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Wise DR, et al. Hypoxia promotes isocitrate dehydrogenase-dependent carboxylation of alpha-ketoglutarate to citrate to support cell growth and viability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2011;108:19611–19616. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1117773108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Mullen AR, et al. Reductive carboxylation supports growth in tumour cells with defective mitochondria. Nature. 2012;481:385–388. doi: 10.1038/nature10642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Metallo CM, et al. Reductive glutamine metabolism by IDH1 mediates lipogenesis under hypoxia. Nature. 2012;481:380–384. doi: 10.1038/nature10602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Scott DA, et al. Comparative metabolic flux profiling of melanoma cell lines: beyond the Warburg effect. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2011;286:42626–42634. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.282046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Cervera AM, et al. Inhibition of succinate dehydrogenase dysregulates histone modification in mammalian cells. Molecular cancer. 2009;8:89. doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-8-89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Lee S, et al. Neuronal apoptosis linked to EglN3 prolyl hydroxylase and familial pheochromocytoma genes: developmental culling and cancer. Cancer cell. 2005;8:155–167. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2005.06.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Schlisio S, et al. The kinesin KIF1Bbeta acts downstream from EglN3 to induce apoptosis and is a potential 1p36 tumor suppressor. Genes & development. 2008;22:884–893. doi: 10.1101/gad.1648608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Alderson NL, et al. S-(2-Succinyl)cysteine: a novel chemical modification of tissue proteins by a Krebs cycle intermediate. Archives of biochemistry and biophysics. 2006;450:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2006.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Ooi A, et al. An antioxidant response phenotype shared between hereditary and sporadic type 2 papillary renal cell carcinoma. Cancer cell. 2011;20:511–523. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2011.08.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Adam J, et al. Renal cyst formation in Fh1-deficient mice is independent of the Hif/Phd pathway: roles for fumarate in KEAP1 succination and Nrf2 signaling. Cancer cell. 2011;20:524–537. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2011.09.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Bardella C, et al. Aberrant succination of proteins in fumarate hydratase-deficient mice and HLRCC patients is a robust biomarker of mutation status. The Journal of pathology. 2011;225:4–11. doi: 10.1002/path.2932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Yoo NJ, et al. Somatic mutations of the KEAP1 gene in common solid cancers. Histopathology. 2012;60:943–952. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2012.04178.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.DeNicola GM, et al. Oncogene-induced Nrf2 transcription promotes ROS detoxification and tumorigenesis. Nature. 2011;475:106–109. doi: 10.1038/nature10189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Koppenol WH, et al. Otto Warburg’s contributions to current concepts of cancer metabolism. Nature reviews Cancer. 2011;11:618–618. doi: 10.1038/nrc3038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Deberardinis RJ, et al. Brick by brick: metabolism and tumor cell growth. Current opinion in genetics & development. 2008;18:54–61. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2008.02.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


