Which guidelines can we trust?: Assessing strength of evidence behind recommendations for clinical practice - PubMed (original) (raw)

Review

Which guidelines can we trust?: Assessing strength of evidence behind recommendations for clinical practice

A Liberati et al. West J Med. 2001 Apr.

No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1

Where quality assessment can be carried out and classification of levels of evidence made explicit

Figure 2

Figure 2

Should a healthy 5-year-old child be screened with urinalysis? [Marazzi/SPL]

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Putting Prevention Into Practice: Clinician's Handbook of Preventive Services: Children and Adolescents—Screening. 2nd ed. US Dept of Health and Human Services; 1998.
    1. Grilli R, Magrini N, Penna A, Mura G, Liberati A. Practice guidelines developed by specialty societies: the need for a critical appraisal. Lancet 2000;355: 103-106. - PubMed
    1. Woolf SH, Battista R, Anderson GM, et al. Assessing the clinical effectiveness of preventive maneuvers: analytic principles and systematic methods in reviewing evidence and developing clinical practice recommendations. A report by the Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. J Clin Epidemiol 1990;43: 891-905. - PubMed
    1. US Preventive Services Task Force. Guide to Clinical Preventive Services. 2nd ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1996.
    1. Moher D, Jadad AR, Tugwell P. Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: current issues and future directions. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1996;12: 195-208. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources