The preferred stoichiometry of c subunits in the rotary motor sector of Escherichia coli ATP synthase is 10 - PubMed (original) (raw)

The preferred stoichiometry of c subunits in the rotary motor sector of Escherichia coli ATP synthase is 10

W Jiang et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001.

Abstract

The stoichiometry of c subunits in the H(+)-transporting F(o) rotary motor of ATP synthase is uncertain, the most recent suggestions varying from 10 to 14. The stoichiometry will determine the number of H(+) transported per ATP synthesized and will directly relate to the P/O ratio of oxidative phosphorylation. The experiments described here show that the number of c subunits in functional complexes of F(o)F(1) ATP synthase from Escherichia coli can be manipulated, but that the preferred number is 10. Mixtures of genetically fused cysteine-substituted trimers (c(3)) and tetramers (c(4)) of subunit c were coexpressed and the c subunits crosslinked in the plasma membrane. Prominent products corresponding to oligomers of c(7) and c(10) were observed in the membrane and purified F(o)F(1) complex, indicating that the c(10) oligomer formed naturally. Oligomers larger than c(10) were also observed in the membrane fraction of cells expressing c(3) or c(4) individually, or in cells coexpressing c(3) and c(4) together, but these larger oligomers did not copurify with the functional F(o)F(1) complex and were concluded to be aberrant products of assembly in the membrane.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1

Rotary model for ATP synthase based on the subunit composition of the_E. coli_ enzyme (8). The F1 portion of the complex is bound at the cytoplasmic face of the membrane. The proton-motive force drives rotation of a ring composed of_c_ subunits, the number (n) of which is uncertain. Protons enter the assembly through a periplasmic inlet channel and bind to the Asp61 carboxylate (open circle) of a subunit c at the_a_1_b_2 stator interface. The protonated binding site then moves from the stator interface into the lipid phase of the membrane, and after_n_ steps the proton is released at an outlet channel on the F1-binding side of the membrane. The γ and ɛ subunits remain fixed to the top of a set of c subunits so that rotation of the c oligomer also drives rotation of subunit γ within the α3β3 hexamer of F1 to alternatively promote ADP + Pi binding and ATP product release in the β catalytic subunits. The_b_2 and δ subunits of the stator hold the α3β3 subunits in a fixed position as the γ subunit turns inside them to drive ATP synthesis. The coupled reaction catalyzed by the complex is reversible so that ATP hydrolysis will drive proton transport in the reverse of the direction shown. This figure is modified from ref. .

Figure 2

Figure 2

Strategy for testing the preferred number of subunit c in E. coli FoF1 complex. (A) System used for coexpression of_c_3(I30C) and_c_4(I30C) substituted proteins in one cell. The eight genes of the atp (ATP synthase) operon are deleted from the chromosome of the cell shown. In the scheme shown, the_c_4 subunit is expressed from a pBR322-derived plasmid carrying genes for the whole atp operon (pWOc4), with transformant cells selected on the basis of plasmid-encoded ampicillin resistance (Ampr). The_c_3 subunit is expressed by itself from a pACYC184-derived plasmid with transformant cells being selected for via chloramphenicol resistance (Cmr). (B) Coexpression of _c_3(I30C) and_c_4(I30C) in the same cell should lead to formation of a _c_10 decamer if that is the preferred structure in Fo. The figure shows the positions of the I30C-substituted cysteine in the first and last subunit of the_c_3 trimer and c_4 tetramer. The approximate shape of a cross section of subunit_c at the position of the I30C substitution is indicated (21). Cys–Cys crosslinking is expected to yield_c_6, _c_7, and_c_10 products.

Figure 3

Figure 3

ATP-driven proton translocation with membrane vesicles from cells expressing _c_3 or_c_4 by themselves, or cells coexpressing_c_3 and _c_4. Coexpression in the pWOc4/pCOc3 and pWOc3/pCOc4 configurations are indicated as (_c_4 +_c_3)I30C and (_c_3 +_c_4)I30C, respectively. The quenching of ACMA fluorescence was used as an indicator the pH gradient established by ATPase-coupled proton pumping. At the times indicated, ATP was added to 0.92 mM and, to terminate the quenching response, the protonophore SF6847 was added to 0.25 μM to make the membranes proton permeable.

Figure 4

Figure 4

Crosslinked products generated in membranes from cells expressing_c_3(I30C) and_c_4(I30C) subunits. All samples were prepared after crosslinking of membranes with I2. The oligomeric size of the crosslinked product is indicated on the vertical axis. (A) Membranes prepared from cells expressing pWOc3(I30C) or pWOc4(I30C) individually or cells expressing both and pWOc4(I30C) and pCOc3(I30C). The deoxycholate/cholate extract and glycerol gradient purified FoF1 fractions from the pWOc4(I30C)/pCOc3(I30C) membranes is also shown. (B) Glycerol gradient fraction shown in A after prolonged development. (C) Glycerol gradient FoF1 fractions prepared from the_c_3 or _c_4 membranes shown in A. (D) Scan of lanes of (_c_4 + _c_3) membrane and glycerol gradient shown in A.

Figure 5

Figure 5

Crosslinked products generated in membranes from cells expressing both the pWOc3(I30C) and pCOc4(I30C) plasmids. Membranes were treated with I2 and the FoF1 complex extracted and purified by glycerol gradient centrifugation as described in the text. (A) Lanes from immunoblot. (B) Scan of crosslinked products ≥_c_6 in the three lanes shown.

Figure 6

Figure 6

Cu(II)-phenanthroline catalyzed crosslinking of monomeric subunit_c_ with double Cys substitutions. (A) Membrane fraction of_c_1(Cys21/Cys65) with (+) and without (−) crosslinking. (B) The crosslinked membrane, deoxycholate/cholate extract, and purified FoF1 from the_c_1(Cys11/Cys75) mutant are shown. Crosslinking was carried out as described (15).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Boyer P D. Annu Rev Biochem. 1997;66:717–749. - PubMed
    1. Noji H, Yasuda R, Yoshida M, Kinosita K., Jr Nature (London) 1997;386:299–302. - PubMed
    1. Duncan T M, Bulygin V V, Zhou Y, Hutcheon M L, Cross R L. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995;92:10964–10968. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sabert D, Engelbrecht S, Junge W. Nature (London) 1996;381:623–625. - PubMed
    1. Sambongi Y, Iko Y, Tanabe M, Omote H, Iwasmoto-Kihara A, Ueda I, Yanagida T, Wada Y, Futai M. Science. 1999;286:1722–1724. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources