early bolting in short days: an Arabidopsis mutation that causes early flowering and partially suppresses the floral phenotype of leafy - PubMed (original) (raw)
. 2001 May;13(5):1011-24.
Affiliations
- PMID: 11340178
- PMCID: PMC135562
early bolting in short days: an Arabidopsis mutation that causes early flowering and partially suppresses the floral phenotype of leafy
C Gómez-Mena et al. Plant Cell. 2001 May.
Abstract
The time of flowering in Arabidopsis is controlled by multiple endogenous and environmental signals. Some of these signals promote the onset of flowering, whereas others repress it. We describe here the isolation and characterization of two allelic mutations that cause early flowering and define a new locus, EARLY BOLTING IN SHORT DAYS (EBS). Acceleration of flowering time in the ebs mutants is especially conspicuous under short-day photoperiods and results from a reduction of the adult vegetative phase of the plants. In addition to the early flowering phenotype, ebs mutants show a reduction in seed dormancy, plant size, and fertility. Double mutant analysis with gibberellin-deficient mutants indicates that both the early-flowering and the precocious-germination phenotypes require gibberellin biosynthesis. Analysis of the genetic interactions among ebs and several mutations causing late flowering shows that the ft mutant phenotype is epistatic over the early flowering of ebs mutants, suggesting that the precocious flowering of ebs requires the FT gene product. Finally, the ebs mutation causes an increase in the level of expression of the floral homeotic genes APETALA3 (AP3), PISTILLATA (PI), and AGAMOUS (AG) and partially rescues the mutant floral phenotype of leafy-6 (lfy-6) mutants. These results suggest that EBS participates as a negative regulator in developmental processes such as germination, flowering induction, and flower organ specification.
Figures
Figure 1.
Phenotype of ebs Mutants. (A) L_er_ (left), ebs-1 (middle), and ebs-2 (right) 5-week-old plants grown under LD (top) or SD (bottom). (B) Average number of juvenile, adult, or cauline leaves for L_er_ and ebs mutants grown under LD or SD photoperiods. Bars indicate ±
se
. (C) Flowers from L_er_ (left), ebs-1 (middle), and ebs-2 (right).
Figure 2.
Effect of the ebs Mutation on Total Leaf Number of ga1-3, ga2-1, and spy-5 Mutants. (A) Total leaf number under LD. (B) Total leaf number under SD. Asterisks indicate that plants were unable to flower after 3 months of growth under SD. During this time, they produced 65 leaves. (C) Phenotype of ebs-1 (left), ebs-1 ga1-3 (middle), and ga1-3 (right) 5-week-old plants grown under LD. Error bars in (A) and (B) indicate ±
se
.
Figure 3.
Reduction in the Dormancy of ebs Mutant Seeds and Its Effect on the Germination of Double Mutants with ga1-3 and spy-5. Germination was scored after 2 weeks of incubation except in (C), where germination was scored as indicated. (A) Germination of L_er_, ebs-1, and ebs-2 seeds after different weeks of storage. (B) Germination rates of L_er_, ebs-1, ga1-3, and ebs-1 ga1-3 freshly harvested seeds in the presence of different GA concentrations. (C) Time course of germination of L_er_, ebs-1, spy5, and ebs-1 spy-5 freshly harvested seeds. (D) Germination rates of L_er_, ebs-1, spy5, and ebs-1 spy-5 freshly harvested seeds in the presence of different concentrations of PAC.
Figure 4.
Effect of the ebs Mutation on Total Leaf Number of Late- Flowering Mutants Affecting the LD Pathway and the Autonomous Pathway. (A) Total leaf number under LD. (B) Total leaf number under SD. (C) Phenotype of ebs-1 (left), ft-1 (middle), and ebs-1 ft-1 (right) 5-week-old plants grown under LD. Error bars in (A) and (B) indicate ±
se
.
Figure 5.
Partial Rescue of the lfy-6 Floral Phenotype by the ebs Mutation. (A) Inflorescence of a lfy-6 mutant plant grown under LD. (B) Inflorescence of an ebs-1 lfy-6 double mutant plant grown under LD. (C) Inflorescence of an ebs-1 lfy-6 double mutant plant grown under SD. (D) Flower from an SD-grown ebs-1 lfy-6 plant showing the partial rescue of petals and stamens.
Figure 6.
Expression of AP3, PI, and AG in ebs-1 and the ebs-1 lfy-6 Double Mutant. Total RNA was isolated from reproductive apices or leaves of LD-grown plants, and 20 μg was loaded in each lane. Blots were probed with radiolabeled AP3, PI, and AG cDNAs and then reprobed with rDNA as a loading control. (A) Steady state levels of AP3, PI, and AG mRNA in apices and leaves of L_er_ and ebs mutants. (B) Steady state levels of AP3, PI, and AG mRNA in apices of ebs-1, lfy-6, and ebs-1 lfy-6 plants.
Figure 7.
Pattern of Expression of AP3 and AG in Floral Meristems of ebs and Inflorescences of the ebs-1 lfy-6 Double Mutant. The expression of AP3 and AG was analyzed by in situ hybridization on longitudinal sections of apical buds from plants grown under LD. (A) L_er_ stage 3 flower probed with AP3. (B) ebs-1 stage 3 flower probed with AP3. (C) L_er_ stage 3 flower probed with AG. (D) ebs-1 stage 3 flower probed with AG. (E) L_er_ stage 6 flower probed with AP3. (F) ebs-1 stage 6 flower probed with AP3. (G) L_er_ stage 5 flower probed with AG. (H) ebs-1 stage 5 flower probed with AG. (I) L_er_ stage 9 flower probed with AP3. (J) ebs-1 stage 9 flower probed with AP3. (K) L_er_ stage 9 flower probed with AG. (L) ebs-1 stage 9 flower probed with AG. (M) lfy-6 mutant inflorescence probed with AP3. (N) ebs-1 lfy-6 double mutant inflorescence probed with AP3. (O) lfy-6 mutant inflorescence probed with AG. (P) ebs-1 lfy-6 double mutant inflorescence probed with AG.
Similar articles
- Mutagenesis of plants overexpressing CONSTANS demonstrates novel interactions among Arabidopsis flowering-time genes.
Onouchi H, Igeño MI, Périlleux C, Graves K, Coupland G. Onouchi H, et al. Plant Cell. 2000 Jun;12(6):885-900. doi: 10.1105/tpc.12.6.885. Plant Cell. 2000. PMID: 10852935 Free PMC article. - The PHD-containing protein EARLY BOLTING IN SHORT DAYS regulates seed dormancy in Arabidopsis.
Narro-Diego L, López-González L, Jarillo JA, Piñeiro M. Narro-Diego L, et al. Plant Cell Environ. 2017 Oct;40(10):2393-2405. doi: 10.1111/pce.13046. Epub 2017 Aug 24. Plant Cell Environ. 2017. PMID: 28770581 - early in short days 4, a mutation in Arabidopsis that causes early flowering and reduces the mRNA abundance of the floral repressor FLC.
Reeves PH, Murtas G, Dash S, Coupland G. Reeves PH, et al. Development. 2002 Dec;129(23):5349-61. doi: 10.1242/dev.00113. Development. 2002. PMID: 12403707 - Three ways to learn the ABCs.
Ng M, Yanofsky MF. Ng M, et al. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2000 Feb;3(1):47-52. doi: 10.1016/s1369-5266(99)00036-9. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2000. PMID: 10679448 Review. - The control of flowering by vernalization.
Sheldon CC, Finnegan EJ, Rouse DT, Tadege M, Bagnall DJ, Helliwell CA, Peacock WJ, Dennis ES. Sheldon CC, et al. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2000 Oct;3(5):418-22. doi: 10.1016/s1369-5266(00)00106-0. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2000. PMID: 11019811 Review.
Cited by
- Genome-wide network model capturing seed germination reveals coordinated regulation of plant cellular phase transitions.
Bassel GW, Lan H, Glaab E, Gibbs DJ, Gerjets T, Krasnogor N, Bonner AJ, Holdsworth MJ, Provart NJ. Bassel GW, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Jun 7;108(23):9709-14. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1100958108. Epub 2011 May 18. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011. PMID: 21593420 Free PMC article. - The early phase change gene in maize.
Vega SH, Sauer M, Orkwiszewski JA, Poethig RS. Vega SH, et al. Plant Cell. 2002 Jan;14(1):133-47. doi: 10.1105/tpc.010406. Plant Cell. 2002. PMID: 11826304 Free PMC article. - Novel loci control variation in reproductive timing in Arabidopsis thaliana in natural environments.
Weinig C, Ungerer MC, Dorn LA, Kane NC, Toyonaga Y, Halldorsdottir SS, Mackay TF, Purugganan MD, Schmitt J. Weinig C, et al. Genetics. 2002 Dec;162(4):1875-84. doi: 10.1093/genetics/162.4.1875. Genetics. 2002. PMID: 12524356 Free PMC article. - Coupling of H3K27me3 recognition with transcriptional repression through the BAH-PHD-CPL2 complex in Arabidopsis.
Zhang YZ, Yuan J, Zhang L, Chen C, Wang Y, Zhang G, Peng L, Xie SS, Jiang J, Zhu JK, Du J, Duan CG. Zhang YZ, et al. Nat Commun. 2020 Dec 4;11(1):6212. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20089-0. Nat Commun. 2020. PMID: 33277495 Free PMC article. - Different divergence events for three pairs of PEBPs in Gossypium as implied by evolutionary analysis.
Lu Y, Chen W, Zhao L, Yao J, Li Y, Yang W, Liu Z, Zhang Y, Sun J. Lu Y, et al. Genes Genomics. 2019 Apr;41(4):445-458. doi: 10.1007/s13258-018-0775-0. Epub 2019 Jan 4. Genes Genomics. 2019. PMID: 30610620
References
- Ahmad, M., and Cashmore, A.R. (1996). The pef mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana define lesions early in the phytochrome signaling pathway. Plant J. 10 1103–1110. - PubMed
- Alvarez, J., Guli, C.L., Yu, X.-H., and Smyth, D.R. (1992). TERMINAL FLOWER, a gene affecting inflorescence development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2 103–116.
- Araki, T., and Komeda, Y. (1993). Analysis of the role of the late-flowering locus, GI, in the flowering of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 3 231–239.
- Bell, C.J., and Ecker, J.R. (1994). Assignment of 30 microsatellite loci to the linkage map of Arabidopsis. Genomics 19 137–144. - PubMed
- Blázquez, M.A., and Weigel, D. (2000). Integration of floral inductive signals in Arabidopsis. Nature 404 889–892. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Molecular Biology Databases
Research Materials
Miscellaneous