Phenotypic and genotypic HIV-1 drug resistance assays provide complementary information - PubMed (original) (raw)
Comparative Study
Phenotypic and genotypic HIV-1 drug resistance assays provide complementary information
Neil Parkin et al. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2002.
Abstract
To determine the extent to which genotype (GT) or phenotype (PT) methods provide HIV-1 drug resistance information that is overlapping or complementary, both tests were performed on 1378 patient plasma samples. Discordance, defined as determination of reduced susceptibility measured by PT but sensitivity by GT (PT-R/GT-S), or vice versa (PT-S/GT-R), was common: 83, 62, 43, and 28% of samples with evidence of drug resistance had at least 1, 2, 3, or 4 drugs discordant, respectively. Three types of discordance were observed: PT-R/GT-S, and PT-S/GT-R with or without the presence of mixtures at resistance-associated positions (25%, 34%, and 41% of all discordance, respectively). After accounting for mixtures, results for didanosine (30%), zalcitabine (18%), tenofovir (17%), abacavir (14%), lamivudine (12%), and amprenavir (11%) were discordant in >or= 10% of samples. PT-S/GT-R results were most common for didanosine and zalcitabine, whereas PT-R/GT-S results were most common for lamivudine and amprenavir. PT provided quantitative assessment of the degree of reduced susceptibility and identified reduced susceptibility (PT-R/GT-S) or normal susceptibility (PT-S/GT-R) that was not recognized by the GT interpretation algorithm. GT provided valuable information when mixtures were present and minor populations of drug resistant virus were not detected by phenotyping (PT-S/GT-R results). This demonstrates the complementary nature of information provided by PT and GT tests and suggests that their combined use can provide additional clinically-relevant information.
Similar articles
- Correlation between rules-based interpretation and virtual phenotype interpretation of HIV-1 genotypes for predicting drug resistance in HIV-infected individuals.
Gallego O, Martin-Carbonero L, Aguero J, de Mendoza C, Corral A, Soriano V. Gallego O, et al. J Virol Methods. 2004 Oct;121(1):115-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2004.06.003. J Virol Methods. 2004. PMID: 15350741 - The M184V mutation in HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (RT) conferring lamivudine resistance does not result in broad cross-resistance to nucleoside analogue RT inhibitors.
Miller V, Stürmer M, Staszewski S, Gröschel B, Hertogs K, de Béthune MP, Pauwels R, Harrigan PR, Bloor S, Kemp SD, Larder BA. Miller V, et al. AIDS. 1998 May 7;12(7):705-12. doi: 10.1097/00002030-199807000-00006. AIDS. 1998. PMID: 9619801 - Clonal resistance analyses of HIV type-1 after failure of therapy with didanosine, lamivudine and tenofovir.
Barnas D, Koontz D, Bazmi H, Bixby C, Jemsek J, Mellors JW. Barnas D, et al. Antivir Ther. 2010;15(3):437-41. doi: 10.3851/IMP1539. Antivir Ther. 2010. PMID: 20516563 Free PMC article. - Quadruple nucleoside therapy with zidovudine, lamivudine, abacavir and tenofovir in the treatment of HIV.
Stürmer M, Staszewski S, Doerr HW. Stürmer M, et al. Antivir Ther. 2007;12(5):695-703. Antivir Ther. 2007. PMID: 17713153 Review. - K65R, TAMs and tenofovir.
Miller MD. Miller MD. AIDS Rev. 2004 Jan-Mar;6(1):22-33. AIDS Rev. 2004. PMID: 15168738 Review.
Cited by
- Novel method for simultaneous quantification of phenotypic resistance to maturation, protease, reverse transcriptase, and integrase HIV inhibitors based on 3'Gag(p2/p7/p1/p6)/PR/RT/INT-recombinant viruses: a useful tool in the multitarget era of antiretroviral therapy.
Weber J, Vazquez AC, Winner D, Rose JD, Wylie D, Rhea AM, Henry K, Pappas J, Wright A, Mohamed N, Gibson R, Rodriguez B, Soriano V, King K, Arts EJ, Olivo PD, Quiñones-Mateu ME. Weber J, et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011 Aug;55(8):3729-42. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00396-11. Epub 2011 May 31. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011. PMID: 21628544 Free PMC article. - Impact of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reverse transcriptase inhibitor drug resistance mutation interactions on phenotypic susceptibility.
Trivedi V, Von Lindern J, Montes-Walters M, Rojo DR, Shell EJ, Parkin N, O'Brien WA, Ferguson MR. Trivedi V, et al. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2008 Oct;24(10):1291-300. doi: 10.1089/aid.2007.0244. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2008. PMID: 18844463 Free PMC article. - Comparison of laboratory methods for analysis of non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor resistance in Ugandan infants.
Church JD, Huang W, Parkin N, Marlowe N, Guay LA, Omer SB, Musoke P, Jackson JB, Eshleman SH. Church JD, et al. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2009 Jul;25(7):657-63. doi: 10.1089/aid.2008.0235. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2009. PMID: 19621988 Free PMC article. - HIV-1 protease and reverse transcriptase mutation patterns responsible for discordances between genotypic drug resistance interpretation algorithms.
Ravela J, Betts BJ, Brun-Vézinet F, Vandamme AM, Descamps D, van Laethem K, Smith K, Schapiro JM, Winslow DL, Reid C, Shafer RW. Ravela J, et al. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2003 May 1;33(1):8-14. doi: 10.1097/00126334-200305010-00002. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2003. PMID: 12792349 Free PMC article. - HIV Resistance Prediction to Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors: Focus on Open Data.
Tarasova O, Poroikov V. Tarasova O, et al. Molecules. 2018 Apr 19;23(4):956. doi: 10.3390/molecules23040956. Molecules. 2018. PMID: 29671808 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous