Label-free protein quantification using LC-coupled ion trap or FT mass spectrometry: Reproducibility, linearity, and application with complex proteomes - PubMed (original) (raw)
Label-free protein quantification using LC-coupled ion trap or FT mass spectrometry: Reproducibility, linearity, and application with complex proteomes
Guanghui Wang et al. J Proteome Res. 2006 May.
Abstract
A critical step in protein biomarker discovery is the ability to contrast proteomes, a process referred generally as quantitative proteomics. While stable-isotope labeling (e.g., ICAT, 18O- or 15N-labeling, or AQUA) remains the core technology used in mass spectrometry-based proteomic quantification, increasing efforts have been directed to the label-free approach that relies on direct comparison of peptide peak areas between LC-MS runs. This latter approach is attractive to investigators for its simplicity as well as cost effectiveness. In the present study, the reproducibility and linearity of using a label-free approach to highly complex proteomes were evaluated. Various amounts of proteins from different proteomes were subjected to repeated LC-MS analyses using an ion trap or Fourier transform mass spectrometer. Highly reproducible data were obtained between replicated runs, as evidenced by nearly ideal Pearson's correlation coefficients (for ion's peak areas or retention time) and average peak area ratios. In general, more than 50% and nearly 90% of the peptide ion ratios deviated less than 10% and 20%, respectively, from the average in duplicate runs. In addition, the multiplicity ratios of the amounts of proteins used correlated nicely with the observed averaged ratios of peak areas calculated from detected peptides. Furthermore, the removal of abundant proteins from the samples led to an improvement in reproducibility and linearity. A computer program has been written to automate the processing of data sets from experiments with groups of multiple samples for statistical analysis. Algorithms for outlier-resistant mean estimation and for adjusting statistical significance threshold in multiplicity of testing were incorporated to minimize the rate of false positives. The program was applied to quantify changes in proteomes of parental and p53-deficient HCT-116 human cells and found to yield reproducible results. Overall, this study demonstrates an alternative approach that allows global quantification of differentially expressed proteins in complex proteomes. The utility of this method to biomarker discovery is likely to synergize with future improvements in the detecting sensitivity of mass spectrometers.
Similar articles
- Isotope coded protein label quantification of serum proteins--comparison with the label-free LC-MS and validation using the MRM approach.
Turtoi A, Mazzucchelli GD, De Pauw E. Turtoi A, et al. Talanta. 2010 Feb 15;80(4):1487-95. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2009.07.035. Epub 2009 Jul 25. Talanta. 2010. PMID: 20082806 - Trypsin catalyzed 16O-to-18O exchange for comparative proteomics: tandem mass spectrometry comparison using MALDI-TOF, ESI-QTOF, and ESI-ion trap mass spectrometers.
Heller M, Mattou H, Menzel C, Yao X. Heller M, et al. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2003 Jul;14(7):704-18. doi: 10.1016/S1044-0305(03)00207-1. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2003. PMID: 12837592 - A simple peak detection and label-free quantitation algorithm for chromatography-mass spectrometry.
Aoshima K, Takahashi K, Ikawa M, Kimura T, Fukuda M, Tanaka S, Parry HE, Fujita Y, Yoshizawa AC, Utsunomiya S, Kajihara S, Tanaka K, Oda Y. Aoshima K, et al. BMC Bioinformatics. 2014 Nov 25;15(1):376. doi: 10.1186/s12859-014-0376-0. BMC Bioinformatics. 2014. PMID: 25420746 Free PMC article. - Computational methods for the comparative quantification of proteins in label-free LCn-MS experiments.
Wong JW, Sullivan MJ, Cagney G. Wong JW, et al. Brief Bioinform. 2008 Mar;9(2):156-65. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbm046. Epub 2007 Sep 28. Brief Bioinform. 2008. PMID: 17905794 Review. - Proteomics technologies for the global identification and quantification of proteins.
Brewis IA, Brennan P. Brewis IA, et al. Adv Protein Chem Struct Biol. 2010;80:1-44. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-381264-3.00001-1. Adv Protein Chem Struct Biol. 2010. PMID: 21109216 Review.
Cited by
- A robust error model for iTRAQ quantification reveals divergent signaling between oncogenic FLT3 mutants in acute myeloid leukemia.
Zhang Y, Askenazi M, Jiang J, Luckey CJ, Griffin JD, Marto JA. Zhang Y, et al. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2010 May;9(5):780-90. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M900452-MCP200. Epub 2009 Dec 17. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2010. PMID: 20019052 Free PMC article. - Phosphoproteomic profiling reveals vasopressin-regulated phosphorylation sites in collecting duct.
Bansal AD, Hoffert JD, Pisitkun T, Hwang S, Chou CL, Boja ES, Wang G, Knepper MA. Bansal AD, et al. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010 Feb;21(2):303-15. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2009070728. Epub 2010 Jan 14. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010. PMID: 20075062 Free PMC article. - Decoy methods for assessing false positives and false discovery rates in shotgun proteomics.
Wang G, Wu WW, Zhang Z, Masilamani S, Shen RF. Wang G, et al. Anal Chem. 2009 Jan 1;81(1):146-59. doi: 10.1021/ac801664q. Anal Chem. 2009. PMID: 19061407 Free PMC article. - Quantifying raft proteins in neonatal mouse brain by 'tube-gel' protein digestion label-free shotgun proteomics.
Yu H, Wakim B, Li M, Halligan B, Tint GS, Patel SB. Yu H, et al. Proteome Sci. 2007 Sep 24;5:17. doi: 10.1186/1477-5956-5-17. Proteome Sci. 2007. PMID: 17892558 Free PMC article. - Taking aim at shotgun phosphoproteomics.
Hoffert JD, Knepper MA. Hoffert JD, et al. Anal Biochem. 2008 Apr 1;375(1):1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2007.11.023. Epub 2007 Nov 22. Anal Biochem. 2008. PMID: 18078798 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous