Comparison of propidium monoazide with ethidium monoazide for differentiation of live vs. dead bacteria by selective removal of DNA from dead cells - PubMed (original) (raw)
Comparative Study
Comparison of propidium monoazide with ethidium monoazide for differentiation of live vs. dead bacteria by selective removal of DNA from dead cells
Andreas Nocker et al. J Microbiol Methods. 2006 Nov.
Abstract
The differentiation between live and dead bacterial cells presents an important challenge in many microbiological applications. Due to the persistence of DNA in the environment after cells have lost viability, DNA-based detection methods cannot differentiate whether positive signals originate from live or dead bacterial targets. We present here a novel chemical, propidium monoazide (PMA), that (like propidium iodide) is highly selective in penetrating only into 'dead' bacterial cells with compromised membrane integrity but not into live cells with intact cell membranes/cell walls. Upon intercalation in the DNA of dead cells, the photo-inducible azide group allows PMA to be covalently cross-linked by exposure to bright light. This process renders the DNA insoluble and results in its loss during subsequent genomic DNA extraction. Subjecting a bacterial population comprised of both live and dead cells to PMA treatment thus results in selective removal of DNA from dead cells. We provide evidence that this chemical can be applied to a wide range of species across the bacterial kingdom presenting a major advantage over ethidium monoazide (EMA). The general application of EMA is hampered by the fact that the chemical can also penetrate live cells of some bacterial species. Transport pumps actively export EMA out of metabolically active cells, but the remaining EMA level can lead to substantial loss of DNA. The higher charge of PMA might be the reason for the higher impermeability through intact cell membranes, thus avoiding DNA loss.
Similar articles
- Selective detection of live bacteria combining propidium monoazide sample treatment with microarray technology.
Nocker A, Mazza A, Masson L, Camper AK, Brousseau R. Nocker A, et al. J Microbiol Methods. 2009 Mar;76(3):253-61. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2008.11.004. Epub 2008 Dec 7. J Microbiol Methods. 2009. PMID: 19103234 - Molecular monitoring of disinfection efficacy using propidium monoazide in combination with quantitative PCR.
Nocker A, Sossa KE, Camper AK. Nocker A, et al. J Microbiol Methods. 2007 Aug;70(2):252-60. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2007.04.014. Epub 2007 May 1. J Microbiol Methods. 2007. PMID: 17544161 - Propidium monoazide treatment to distinguish between live and dead methanogens in pure cultures and environmental samples.
Heise J, Nega M, Alawi M, Wagner D. Heise J, et al. J Microbiol Methods. 2016 Feb;121:11-23. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2015.12.002. Epub 2015 Dec 4. J Microbiol Methods. 2016. PMID: 26656002 - Novel approaches toward preferential detection of viable cells using nucleic acid amplification techniques.
Nocker A, Camper AK. Nocker A, et al. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2009 Feb;291(2):137-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2008.01429.x. Epub 2008 Nov 21. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2009. PMID: 19054073 Review. - Molecular pathogen detection in biosolids with a focus on quantitative PCR using propidium monoazide for viable cell enumeration.
van Frankenhuyzen JK, Trevors JT, Lee H, Flemming CA, Habash MB. van Frankenhuyzen JK, et al. J Microbiol Methods. 2011 Dec;87(3):263-72. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2011.09.007. Epub 2011 Sep 22. J Microbiol Methods. 2011. PMID: 21963489 Review.
Cited by
- Method-Dependent Implications in Foodborne Pathogen Quantification: The Case of Campylobacter coli Survival on Meat as Comparatively Assessed by Colony Count and Viability PCR.
Lazou TP, Gelasakis AI, Chaintoutis SC, Iossifidou EG, Dovas CI. Lazou TP, et al. Front Microbiol. 2021 Mar 1;12:604933. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.604933. eCollection 2021. Front Microbiol. 2021. PMID: 33732219 Free PMC article. - Development of PMAxxTM-Based qPCR for the Quantification of Viable and Non-viable Load of Salmonella From Poultry Environment.
Zhang J, Khan S, Chousalkar KK. Zhang J, et al. Front Microbiol. 2020 Sep 22;11:581201. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.581201. eCollection 2020. Front Microbiol. 2020. PMID: 33072053 Free PMC article. - Pathogens protection against the action of disinfectants in multispecies biofilms.
Sanchez-Vizuete P, Orgaz B, Aymerich S, Le Coq D, Briandet R. Sanchez-Vizuete P, et al. Front Microbiol. 2015 Jul 14;6:705. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00705. eCollection 2015. Front Microbiol. 2015. PMID: 26236291 Free PMC article. Review. - Neem (Azadirachta indica A. Juss) Oil to Tackle Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli.
Del Serrone P, Toniolo C, Nicoletti M. Del Serrone P, et al. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:343610. doi: 10.1155/2015/343610. Epub 2015 May 3. Biomed Res Int. 2015. PMID: 26064900 Free PMC article. - Stress Resistance and Pathogenicity of Nonthermal-Plasma-Induced Viable-but-Nonculturable Staphylococcus aureus through Energy Suppression, Oxidative Stress Defense, and Immune-Escape Mechanisms.
Liao X, Hu W, Liu D, Ding T. Liao X, et al. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2021 Jan 4;87(2):e02380-20. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02380-20. Print 2021 Jan 4. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2021. PMID: 33097509 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials