Safety and immunogenicity of a human and mouse gp100 DNA vaccine in a phase I trial of patients with melanoma - PubMed (original) (raw)

Geoffrey Y Ku, Humilidad F Gallardo, Francesca Orlandi, Gregor Manukian, Teresa S Rasalan, Yinyan Xu, Hao Li, Shachi Vyas, Zhenyu Mu, Paul B Chapman, Susan E Krown, Katherine Panageas, Stephanie L Terzulli, Lloyd J Old, Alan N Houghton, Jedd D Wolchok

Affiliations

Clinical Trial

Safety and immunogenicity of a human and mouse gp100 DNA vaccine in a phase I trial of patients with melanoma

Jianda Yuan et al. Cancer Immun. 2009.

Abstract

A differentiation antigen commonly expressed on melanoma cells, gp100 is the target of infiltrating T cells. We conducted a phase I randomized cross-over trial of melanoma patients with either xenogeneic (mouse) or human gp100 plasmid DNA injected intramuscularly at three dosages (100, 500 or 1,500 microg) every three weeks for three doses. After the first three injections, patients were then immunized three times with gp100 from the other species. Peripheral blood samples were analyzed at various time points following 10-day culture with gp100 peptides using multi-parametric flow cytometry. A total of 19 patients were enrolled, with 18 assessable for immune function and survival. 14 (74%) were male, with a median age of 56 years (range, 20-82). All patients had no evidence of disease; 10 (53%) had stage III disease, 3 each (16%) had stage IIB and IV disease, 2 (11%) had choroidal and 1 (5%) had anal mucosal involvement. With a median follow-up of 30 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) is 44 months. Median survival is not reached. There was no grade 3/4 toxicity; the most common grade 1/2 toxicity was an injection site reaction in 12 patients (63%, all grade 1). Five patients developed CD8+ cells binding gp100(280-288) HLA-A2-restricted tetramer. One patient had an increase in CD8+ IFN-gamma+ cells. This xenogeneic immunization strategy was safe and associated with minimal toxicity. There was also evidence of immune response.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Murray T, Thun MJ. Cancer statistics, 2008. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008;58:71–96. - PubMed
    1. Houghton AN, Eisinger M, Albino AP, Cairncross JG, Old LJ. Surface antigens of melanocytes and melanomas. Markers of melanocyte differentiation and melanoma subsets. J Exp Med. 1982;156:1755–1766. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Houghton AN, Taormina MC, Ikeda H, Watanabe T, Oettgen HF, Old LJ. Serological survey of normal humans for natural antibody to cell surface antigens of melanoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980;77:4260–4264. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Thomson TM, Real FX, Murakami S, Cordon-Cardo C, Old LJ, Houghton AN. Differentiation antigens of melanocytes and melanoma: analysis of melanosome and cell surface markers of human pigmented cells with monoclonal antibodies. J Invest Dermatol. 1988;90:459–466. - PubMed
    1. Chi DD, Merchant RE, Rand R, Conrad AJ, Garrison D, Turner R, Morton DL, Hoon DS. Molecular detection of tumor-associated antigens shared by human cutaneous melanomas and gliomas. Am J Pathol. 1997;150:2143–2152. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources