eIF5 has GDI activity necessary for translational control by eIF2 phosphorylation - PubMed (original) (raw)

eIF5 has GDI activity necessary for translational control by eIF2 phosphorylation

Martin D Jennings et al. Nature. 2010.

Erratum in

Abstract

In protein synthesis initiation, the eukaryotic translation initiation factor (eIF) 2 (a G protein) functions in its GTP-bound state to deliver initiator methionyl-tRNA (tRNA(i)(Met)) to the small ribosomal subunit and is necessary for protein synthesis in all cells. Phosphorylation of eIF2 [eIF2(alphaP)] is critical for translational control in diverse settings including nutrient deprivation, viral infection and memory formation. eIF5 functions in start site selection as a GTPase accelerating protein (GAP) for the eIF2.GTP.tRNA(i)(Met) ternary complex within the ribosome-bound pre-initiation complex. Here we define new regulatory functions of eIF5 in the recycling of eIF2 from its inactive eIF2.GDP state between successive rounds of translation initiation. First we show that eIF5 stabilizes the binding of GDP to eIF2 and is therefore a bi-functional protein that acts as a GDP dissociation inhibitor (GDI). We find that this activity is independent of the GAP function and identify conserved residues within eIF5 that are necessary for this role. Second we show that eIF5 is a critical component of the eIF2(alphaP) regulatory complex that inhibits the activity of the guanine-nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) eIF2B. Together our studies define a new step in the translation initiation pathway, one that is critical for normal translational controls.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1. eIF5 has GDI activity

a) Scheme for GDI activity assay. b) Increasing eIF5 stabilises GDP-binding to eIF2. Koff GDP from 60 pmol eIF2 with varying concentrations of GST-eIF5 (0-240 pmol, open circles) or GST alone (filled circle). Molar eIF2:GST-eIF5 protein ratios are indicated. c) Defining regions required for GDI activity. Mean Koff GDP (60 pmol eIF2) for indicated constructs derived from reactions with GST- or FLAG-eIF5 proteins (120 pmol). Black bars represent a significant reduction in Koff GDP (P<0.0001, unpaired Student's _t_-test). Errors show standard deviation (n>3). 2.9 mM Mg2+ was used in b) and c).

Figure 2

Figure 2. The CTD of eIF5 is critical for interaction with eIF2

Affinity chromatography assay between eIF2 (110 pmol) and the indicated immobilized GST-eIF5 constructs. eIF2 was detected by immunoblotting using antibodies specific for a) eIF2γ or b) eIF2α. Representative blots are shown. Signal intensity was quantified (Adobe Photoshop) and the mean ± standard deviation (n=3) are shown below. c) Total protein in each sample stained with Ponceau S. Inputs (lanes 1) represent 10% of total.

Figure 3

Figure 3. The Linker Region of eIF5 interacts with γ subunit of eIF2

Affinity chromatography as in figure 2 between indicated immobilized GST-eIF5 constructs and total cell extracts (500 μg) expressing c-Myc-6xHis-eIF2γ from either a single copy (sc) or high copy (hc) plasmid. Immunoblots were developed with c-Myc and eIF2α antibodies. Total protein in each sample was stained with Ponceau S. Inputs (lane 1) represent 5% (blots) or 1% (stain) of total.

Figure 4

Figure 4. GDI activity antagonises eIF2B and affects GCN4 activation in vivo

a-c) Strains expressing single (sc) or high copy (hc) eIF5 plasmids as the source of eIF5 and co-transformed with plasmids expressing GCN2, vector alone (_gcn2_Δ) [a, b] or the constitutively active mutant GCN2M788V,E1591K (GCN2c) [c] were grown as stated. d) Left, immunoblots following FLAG-eIF5 immune precipitation of protein complexes from cells grown in nutrient sufficient conditions (SCD) and following starvation (SD+3AT). Right, quantification ± standard deviation (n=3). e) Model for recycling and regulation of eIF2, incorporating eIF5 GDI activity. Dashed grey arrows indicate steps that limit eIF2 recycling.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kapp LD, Lorsch JR. The molecular mechanics of eukaryotic translation. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2004;73:657–704. - PubMed
    1. Sonenberg N, Hinnebusch AG. Regulation of translation initiation in eukaryotes: mechanisms and biological targets. Cell. 2009;136:731–745. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Scheuner D, et al. Control of mRNA translation preserves endoplasmic reticulum function in beta cells and maintains glucose homeostasis. Nat. Med. 2005;11:757–764. - PubMed
    1. Costa-Mattioli M, et al. eIF2alpha phosphorylation bidirectionally regulates the switch from short- to long-term synaptic plasticity and memory. Cell. 2007;129:195–206. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mohr I. Neutralizing innate host defenses to control viral translation in HSV-1 infected cells. Int. Rev. Immunol. 2004;23:199–220. - PubMed

Additional Reference

    1. Gietz RD, Woods RA. Transformation of yeast by lithium acetate/single-stranded carrier DNA/polyethylene glycol method. Methods Enzymol. 2002;350:87–96. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources