Effects of supplemented isoenergetic diets differing in cereal fiber and protein content on insulin sensitivity in overweight humans - PubMed (original) (raw)

Randomized Controlled Trial

doi: 10.3945/ajcn.110.004374. Epub 2011 Jun 1.

Michael Roden, Frank Isken, Daniela Hoffmann, Peter Nowotny, Martin Osterhoff, Michael Blaut, Carl Alpert, Ozlem Gögebakan, Christiane Bumke-Vogt, Friederike Mueller, Jürgen Machann, Tom M Barber, Klaus J Petzke, Johannes Hierholzer, Silke Hornemann, Michael Kruse, Anne-Kathrin Illner, Angela Kohl, Christian V Loeffelholz, Ayman M Arafat, Matthias Möhlig, Andreas F H Pfeiffer

Affiliations

Free article

Randomized Controlled Trial

Effects of supplemented isoenergetic diets differing in cereal fiber and protein content on insulin sensitivity in overweight humans

Martin O Weickert et al. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011 Aug.

Free article

Abstract

Background: Despite their beneficial effects on weight loss and blood lipids, high-protein (HP) diets have been shown to increase insulin resistance and diabetes risk, whereas high-cereal-fiber (HCF) diets have shown the opposite effects on these outcomes.

Objective: We compared the effects of isoenergetic HP and HCF diets and a diet with moderate increases in both cereal fibers and dietary protein (Mix diet) on insulin sensitivity, as measured by using euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamps with infusion of [6,6-(2)H(2)]glucose.

Design: We randomly assigned 111 overweight adults with features of the metabolic syndrome to 1 of 4 two-phased, 18-wk isoenergetic diets by group-matching. Per 3-d food protocols, the percentages of energy derived from protein and carbohydrates and the intake of cereal fiber per day, respectively, were as follows-after 6 wk: 17%, 52%, and 14 g (control); 17%, 52%, and 43 g (HCF); 28%, 43%, and 13 g (HP); 23%, 44%, and 26 g (Mix); after 18 wk: 17%, 51%, and 15 g (control); 17%, 51%, and 41 g (HCF); 26%, 45%, and 14 g (HP); and 22%, 46%, and 26 g (Mix). Eighty-four participants completed the study successfully and were included in the final analyses. Adherence was supported by the provision of tailored dietary supplements twice daily in all groups.

Results: Insulin sensitivity expressed as an M value was 25% higher after 6 wk of the HCF diet than after 6 wk of the HP diet (subgroup analysis: 4.61 ± 0.38 compared with 3.71 ± 0.36 mg · kg(-1) · min(-1), P = 0.008; treatment × time interaction: P = 0.005). Effects were attenuated after 18 wk (treatment × time interaction: P = 0.054), which was likely explained by lower adherence to the HP diet. HP intake was associated with a tendency to increased protein expression in adipose tissue of the translation initiation factor serine-kinase-6-1, which is known to mediate amino acid-induced insulin resistance. Biomarkers of protein intake indicated interference of cereal fibers with dietary protein absorption.

Conclusion: Greater changes in insulin sensitivity after intake of an isoenergetic HCF than after intake of an HP diet might help to explain the diverse effects of these diets on diabetes risk. This trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00579657.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources