The 2017 hormone therapy position statement of The North American Menopause Society - PubMed (original) (raw)
Practice Guideline
. 2017 Jul;24(7):728-753.
doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000000921.
Collaborators
- PMID: 28650869
- DOI: 10.1097/GME.0000000000000921
Practice Guideline
The 2017 hormone therapy position statement of The North American Menopause Society
The NAMS 2017 Hormone Therapy Position Statement Advisory Panel. Menopause. 2017 Jul.
Abstract
The 2017 Hormone Therapy Position Statement of The North American Menopause Society (NAMS) updates the 2012 Hormone Therapy Position Statement of The North American Menopause Society and identifies future research needs. An Advisory Panel of clinicians and researchers expert in the field of women's health and menopause was recruited by NAMS to review the 2012 Position Statement, evaluate new literature, assess the evidence, and reach consensus on recommendations, using the level of evidence to identify the strength of recommendations and the quality of the evidence. The Panel's recommendations were reviewed and approved by the NAMS Board of Trustees.Hormone therapy (HT) remains the most effective treatment for vasomotor symptoms (VMS) and the genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) and has been shown to prevent bone loss and fracture. The risks of HT differ depending on type, dose, duration of use, route of administration, timing of initiation, and whether a progestogen is used. Treatment should be individualized to identify the most appropriate HT type, dose, formulation, route of administration, and duration of use, using the best available evidence to maximize benefits and minimize risks, with periodic reevaluation of the benefits and risks of continuing or discontinuing HT.For women aged younger than 60 years or who are within 10 years of menopause onset and have no contraindications, the benefit-risk ratio is most favorable for treatment of bothersome VMS and for those at elevated risk for bone loss or fracture. For women who initiate HT more than 10 or 20 years from menopause onset or are aged 60 years or older, the benefit-risk ratio appears less favorable because of the greater absolute risks of coronary heart disease, stroke, venous thromboembolism, and dementia. Longer durations of therapy should be for documented indications such as persistent VMS or bone loss, with shared decision making and periodic reevaluation. For bothersome GSM symptoms not relieved with over-the-counter therapies and without indications for use of systemic HT, low-dose vaginal estrogen therapy or other therapies are recommended.This NAMS position statement has been endorsed by Academy of Women's Health, American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, American Association of Nurse Practitioners, American Medical Women's Association, American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Asociación Mexicana para el Estudio del Climaterio, Association of Reproductive Health Professionals, Australasian Menopause Society, Chinese Menopause Society, Colegio Mexicano de Especialistas en Ginecologia y Obstetricia, Czech Menopause and Andropause Society, Dominican Menopause Society, European Menopause and Andropause Society, German Menopause Society, Groupe d'études de la ménopause et du vieillissement Hormonal, HealthyWomen, Indian Menopause Society, International Menopause Society, International Osteoporosis Foundation, International Society for the Study of Women's Sexual Health, Israeli Menopause Society, Japan Society of Menopause and Women's Health, Korean Society of Menopause, Menopause Research Society of Singapore, National Association of Nurse Practitioners in Women's Health, SOBRAC and FEBRASGO, SIGMA Canadian Menopause Society, Società Italiana della Menopausa, Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada, South African Menopause Society, Taiwanese Menopause Society, and the Thai Menopause Society. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists supports the value of this clinical document as an educational tool, June 2017. The British Menopause Society supports this Position Statement.
Republished in
- The 2017 hormone therapy position statement of The North American Menopause Society.
[No authors listed] [No authors listed] Menopause. 2018 Nov;25(11):1362-1387. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000001241. Menopause. 2018. PMID: 30358733
Similar articles
- The 2017 hormone therapy position statement of The North American Menopause Society.
[No authors listed] [No authors listed] Menopause. 2018 Nov;25(11):1362-1387. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000001241. Menopause. 2018. PMID: 30358733 - The 2022 hormone therapy position statement of The North American Menopause Society.
“The 2022 Hormone Therapy Position Statement of The North American Menopause Society” Advisory Panel. “The 2022 Hormone Therapy Position Statement of The North American Menopause Society” Advisory Panel. Menopause. 2022 Jul 1;29(7):767-794. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000002028. Menopause. 2022. PMID: 35797481 - The 2012 hormone therapy position statement of: The North American Menopause Society.
North American Menopause Society. North American Menopause Society. Menopause. 2012 Mar;19(3):257-71. doi: 10.1097/gme.0b013e31824b970a. Menopause. 2012. PMID: 22367731 Free PMC article. - Estrogen and progestogen use in peri- and postmenopausal women: March 2007 position statement of The North American Menopause Society.
North American Menopause Society. North American Menopause Society. Menopause. 2007 Mar-Apr;14(2):168-82. doi: 10.1097/gme.0b013e31803167ab. Menopause. 2007. PMID: 17259911 - NAMS 3rd Utian Translational Science Symposium, October 2016, Orlando, Florida A conversation about hormone therapy: is there an appropriate dose, route, and duration of use?
The North American Menopause Society (NAMS). The North American Menopause Society (NAMS). Menopause. 2017 Nov;24(11):1221-1235. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000000986. Menopause. 2017. PMID: 28968302
Cited by
- [Factors influencing quality of life in post-menopausal women].
Shin H, Lee E. Shin H, et al. Korean J Women Health Nurs. 2020 Dec 31;26(4):336-345. doi: 10.4069/kjwhn.2020.11.14. Epub 2020 Dec 7. Korean J Women Health Nurs. 2020. PMID: 36312302 Free PMC article. Korean. - Knowledge and Awareness Toward Menopausal Hormone Therapy in a Fourth-Tier City of China.
Li R, Zhang H, Feng Y, Wang Y, Wang X, Gao S, Dong L, Zhao X, Li H, Li L, Guo X. Li R, et al. Med Sci Monit. 2024 Sep 6;30:e942577. doi: 10.12659/MSM.942577. Med Sci Monit. 2024. PMID: 39238178 Free PMC article. - Prescription patterns of herbal medicine for menopausal disorders in major Korean medicine hospitals: a multicenter retrospective study.
Lee HW, Choi TY, Lee MS, Lee JA, Jun JH, Choi J, Ang L, Lee CH, Lee JM, Park KS, Kim DC, Jang SR, Yoo JE, Kim DI, Cho SH, Yang SJ, Lee IS, Ahn IS, Lee DN, Choi CM, Song MH, Kim E. Lee HW, et al. Integr Med Res. 2021 Sep;10(3):100706. doi: 10.1016/j.imr.2020.100706. Epub 2020 Dec 4. Integr Med Res. 2021. PMID: 33665094 Free PMC article. - Effects of Menopause in Women With Multiple Sclerosis: An Evidence-Based Review.
Bove R, Okai A, Houtchens M, Elias-Hamp B, Lugaresi A, Hellwig K, Kubala Havrdová E. Bove R, et al. Front Neurol. 2021 Mar 19;12:554375. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.554375. eCollection 2021. Front Neurol. 2021. PMID: 33815241 Free PMC article. Review. - Usefulness of patient-reported outcomes to assess the effectiveness of topical hormonal therapy for gynecologic symptoms after antihormonal treatment for breast cancer.
Jain AL, Jamy O, Mullins J, Usman RM, Hare F, Valasareddy P, Chaudhry A, Ryder J, Smith JR, Miller E, Ranganath H, Schwartzberg L, Stepanski E, Walker M, Gatwood J, Vidal GA. Jain AL, et al. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2020 Apr 7;33(3):331-335. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2020.1744059. eCollection 2020 Jul. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2020. PMID: 32675948 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials