Heuristics and cognitive biases: A conceptual analysis - PubMed (original) (raw)

. 2026 May;54(4):1357-1372.

doi: 10.3758/s13421-025-01814-w. Epub 2025 Oct 31.

Affiliations

Heuristics and cognitive biases: A conceptual analysis

Vitaliy Nadurak. Mem Cognit. 2026 May.

Abstract

The terms heuristics and cognitive biases are often used loosely, with definitions that lack clarity. This paper refines these terms by presenting two definitions of heuristics: a narrow and a broad one. The narrow definition reflects Kahneman and Tversky's view of heuristics as perception-like, natural assessments. From this perspective, people use various types of information as cues to make judgments about things not directly accessible but important to them. Some cues have high indicative value, i.e., the probability of achieving the desired result. Based on them, rules like "If A, then B" are formed, which become useful heuristics. Thus, heuristics are simple, intuitive if/then rules of judgment and decision making that, using such cues, generally enable the achievement of intended goals. Pólya, Simon, Gigerenzer, and others also describe a different type of heuristics - conscious methods that simplify decision making and problem solving. Taking them into account, it is possible to propose a broad definition of heuristics according to which they are simple methods of judgment, decision making, and problem solving that, using little information and cognitive resources, mostly enable the achievement of the intended goal. As for cognitive biases, they are systematic errors in cognition that occur when, having an epistemic goal, we non-consciously deviate from it by relying on irrelevant or partially relevant information and ignoring that which is relevant. They arise from the same cognitive processes as Kahneman and Tversky's heuristics: just as we, without conscious awareness, use heuristic cues for judgment and decision making, we rely on irrelevant information when pursuing epistemic goals.

Keywords: Cognitive biases; Decision making; Heuristics; Judgment; Rationality.

© 2025. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval: Not applicable. Consent to participate: Not applicable. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Conflicts of interest/Competing interests: The author has no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose. Open Practices Statement: There is nothing to declare.

References

    1. Alloy, L. B., & Tabachnik, N. (1984). Assessment of covariation by humans and animals: The joint influence of prior expectations and current situational information. Psychological Review, 91(1), 112–149. -DOI -PubMed
    1. APA Dictionary of Psychology. (2018). Heuristic. Retrieved from https://dictionary.apa.org/heuristic . Accessed February 26, 2025.
    1. Baron, J. (2008). Thinking and deciding (4th ed.). Cambridge University Press.
    1. Blaine, B., & Crocker, J. (1993). Self-esteem and self-serving biases in reactions to positive and negative events: An integrative review. In R. F. Baumeister (Ed.), Self-esteem: The puzzle of low self-regard (pp. 55–85). Plenum Press. -DOI
    1. Blanco, F. (2017). Cognitive Bias. In J. Vonk, & T.K. Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Animal Cognition and Behavior. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47829-6_1244-1

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources