Matrix-based comparative genomic hybridization: biochips to screen for genomic imbalances - PubMed (original) (raw)

. 1997 Dec;20(4):399-407.

Affiliations

• PMID: 9408757

Matrix-based comparative genomic hybridization: biochips to screen for genomic imbalances

S Solinas-Toldo et al. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 1997 Dec.

Abstract

Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) to metaphase chromosomes has been widely used for the genome-wide screening of genomic imbalances in tumor cells. Substitution of the chromosome targets by a matrix consisting of an ordered set of defined nucleic acid target sequences would greatly enhance the resolution and simplify the analysis procedure, both of which are prerequisites for a broad application of CGH as a diagnostic tool. However, hybridization of whole genomic human DNA to immobilized single-copy DNA fragments with complexities below the megabase pair level has been hampered by the low probability of specific binding because of the high probe complexity. We developed a protocol that allows CGH to chips consisting of glass slides with immobilized target DNAs arrayed in small spots. High-copy-number amplifications contained in tumor cells were rapidly scored by use of target DNAs as small as a cosmid. Low-copy-number gains and losses were identified reliably by their ratios by use of chromosome-specific DNA libraries or genomic fragments as small as 75 kb cloned in PI or PAC vectors as targets, thus greatly improving the resolution achievable by chromosomal CGH. The ratios obtained for the same chromosomal imbalance by matrix CGH and by chromosomal CGH corresponded very well. The new matrix CGH protocol provides a basis for the development of automated diagnostic procedures with biochips designed to meet clinical needs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

• High resolution analysis of DNA copy number variation using comparative genomic hybridization to microarrays.
  Pinkel D, Segraves R, Sudar D, Clark S, Poole I, Kowbel D, Collins C, Kuo WL, Chen C, Zhai Y, Dairkee SH, Ljung BM, Gray JW, Albertson DG. Pinkel D, et al. Nat Genet. 1998 Oct;20(2):207-11. doi: 10.1038/2524. Nat Genet. 1998. PMID: 9771718
• Comparative genomic hybridization for analysis of changes in DNA copy number in multiple myeloma.
  Rao PH. Rao PH. Methods Mol Med. 2005;113:71-83. doi: 10.1385/1-59259-916-8:71. Methods Mol Med. 2005. PMID: 15968096
• Improving degenerate oligonucleotide primed PCR-comparative genomic hybridization for analysis of DNA copy number changes in tumors.
  Huang Q, Schantz SP, Rao PH, Mo J, McCormick SA, Chaganti RS. Huang Q, et al. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2000 Aug;28(4):395-403. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2000. PMID: 10862048
• MAPH: from gels to microarrays.
  Patsalis PC, Kousoulidou L, Sismani C, Männik K, Kurg A. Patsalis PC, et al. Eur J Med Genet. 2005 Jul-Sep;48(3):241-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2005.04.011. Eur J Med Genet. 2005. PMID: 16179220 Review.
• New perspectives for tumor pathology provided by comparative genomic hybridization.
  Oga A, Kawauchi S, Izumi H, Ping LX, Furuya T, Sasaki K. Oga A, et al. Int J Clin Oncol. 2002 Jun;7(3):133-7. doi: 10.1007/s101470200019. Int J Clin Oncol. 2002. PMID: 12109513 Review.

Cited by

• The consequences of chromosomal aneuploidy on the transcriptome of cancer cells.
  Ried T, Hu Y, Difilippantonio MJ, Ghadimi BM, Grade M, Camps J. Ried T, et al. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012 Jul;1819(7):784-93. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2012.02.020. Epub 2012 Mar 6. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012. PMID: 22426433 Free PMC article. Review.
• Copy number variants in locally raised Chinese chicken genomes determined using array comparative genomic hybridization.
  Tian M, Wang Y, Gu X, Feng C, Fang S, Hu X, Li N. Tian M, et al. BMC Genomics. 2013 Apr 17;14:262. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-262. BMC Genomics. 2013. PMID: 23594354 Free PMC article.
• Emerging patterns of cryptic chromosomal imbalance in patients with idiopathic mental retardation and multiple congenital anomalies: a new series of 140 patients and review of published reports.
  Menten B, Maas N, Thienpont B, Buysse K, Vandesompele J, Melotte C, de Ravel T, Van Vooren S, Balikova I, Backx L, Janssens S, De Paepe A, De Moor B, Moreau Y, Marynen P, Fryns JP, Mortier G, Devriendt K, Speleman F, Vermeesch JR. Menten B, et al. J Med Genet. 2006 Aug;43(8):625-33. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2005.039453. Epub 2006 Feb 20. J Med Genet. 2006. PMID: 16490798 Free PMC article.
• Advanced molecular cytogenetics in human and mouse.
  Dorritie K, Montagna C, Difilippantonio MJ, Ried T. Dorritie K, et al. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2004 Sep;4(5):663-76. doi: 10.1586/14737159.4.5.663. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2004. PMID: 15347260 Free PMC article. Review.
• Array-based technology and recommendations for utilization in medical genetics practice for detection of chromosomal abnormalities.
  Manning M, Hudgins L; Professional Practice and Guidelines Committee. Manning M, et al. Genet Med. 2010 Nov;12(11):742-5. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181f8baad. Genet Med. 2010. PMID: 20962661 Free PMC article.

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources

• Full Text Sources

  • Wiley

• Other Literature Sources

  • The Lens - Patent Citations Database

• Research Materials

  • NCI CPTC Antibody Characterization Program

• Miscellaneous

  • NCI CPTAC Assay Portal