David Macarthur | The University of Sydney (original) (raw)
books edited by David Macarthur
This collection offers a synoptic view of current philosophical debates concerning the relationsh... more This collection offers a synoptic view of current philosophical debates concerning the relationship between facts and values, bringing together a wide spectrum of contributors committed to testing the validity of this dichotomy, exploring alternatives, and assessing their implications. The assumption that facts and values inhabit distinct, unbridgeable conceptual and experiential domains has long dominated scientific and philosophical discourse, but this separation has been seriously called into question from a number of corners. The original essays here collected offer a diversity of responses to fact-value dichotomy, including contributions from Hilary Putnam and Ruth Anna Putnam who are rightly credited with revitalizing philosophical interest in this alleged opposition. Both they, and many of our contributors, are in agreement that the relationship between epistemic developments and evaluative attitudes cannot be framed as a conflict between descriptive and normative understanding. Each chapter demonstrates how and why contrapositions between science and ethics, between facts and values, and between objective and subjective are false dichotomies. Values cannot simply be separated from reason. Facts and Values will therefore prove essential reading for analytic and continental philosophers alike, for theorists of ethics and meta-ethics, and for philosophers of economics, sociology and law. Reviews "The concept of normativity spans a series of interrelated dichotomies that lie at the heart of philosophical inquiry: fact and value, is and ought, the objective and the subjective, causes and reasons, the natural world and human sensibilities. Much philosophical effort has been devoted to accentuating the gaps between the concepts juxtaposed by each of these pairs, and the fallacies involved in their conflation. This volume, however, seeks to bridge these gaps. The papers collected here—all written expressly for this volume—set out to show that normative discourse must be sensitive to the facts, and that reasoning about facts is inherently value
Papers – Liberal Naturalism by David Macarthur
De Caro, M. & Macarthur, D. (eds.), The Handbook of Liberal Naturalism. London: Routledge., 2022
In this paper I shall consider the relationship between naturalism and aesthetics. In order to ad... more In this paper I shall consider the relationship between naturalism and aesthetics. In order to address this question I want to critically discuss Murray Smith’s book "Film, Art and the Third Culture" (2017) because it has the virtue of putting this question at the centre of its account of the aesthetics of film. I shall argue for two main ideas: firstly, that earning the label “non-reductive” in the setting of a scientific naturalism is a lot more problematic than Smith supposes and once one sees the difficulties that arise then the possibility of a non-scientific or liberal naturalism becomes attractive; and, secondly, whereas Smith thinks the way to thicken explanations in (film) aesthetics is to go sub-personal by invoking sub-personal neural mechanisms in the explanation of aesthetic phenomena, I suggest that such a move is optional and, in any case, philosophically problematic.
The Cambridge History of Philosophy: 1945-2015, ed. K. Becker & K.D. Thomson, 2019
Naturalism as a philosophy of nature, what it consists in, and our ways of knowing nature (so con... more Naturalism as a philosophy of nature, what it consists in, and our ways of knowing nature (so conceived) has a long history in philosophy. In the twentieth century the question of naturalism has been, for the most part, centrally concerned with the question of philosophy's relation to science, especially the natural (or "hard") sciences. Its moral is that philosophy can no longer continue to think of itself as an autonomous discipline or stance distinct from science. I will proceed by examining in some detail the naturalisms of W. V. O. Quine and David Armstrong, which seem to align as a result of a commitment to what, at first, seem the same doctrines of Physicalism, Empiricism, and Metaphysical Realism. Against this perception of near-alignment I want to argue that they do not neatly line up on the naturalist side of the long-standing opposition between idealism and naturalism. In fact, in some key respects, Quine's naturalism contains traces of idealism. The real opposition is between normativism and naturalism. I conclude by briefly contrasting two normativist positions-idealism and liberal naturalism-and come down in favour of the latter.
For a New Naturalism, Arran Gare & Wayne Hudson (eds.), Candor, NY: Telos., 2017
A Companion to Naturalism, Juliano Do Carmo (ed.), Pelotas, Brazil: Nepfil.
Australasian Philosophy Review, vol. 18 no. 2: 179–183., 2019
Philosophia, vol. 43 no. 3, 2015
Naturalism and Normativity, New York: Columbia University Press, 2010
Analisis (Spain), vol. 1 no. 1, 2014
Philo, vol. 11 no. 1, 2008
Erkenntnis, vol. 61, 2004
Naturalism and Normativity, New York: Columbia University Press, 2010
This collection offers a synoptic view of current philosophical debates concerning the relationsh... more This collection offers a synoptic view of current philosophical debates concerning the relationship between facts and values, bringing together a wide spectrum of contributors committed to testing the validity of this dichotomy, exploring alternatives, and assessing their implications. The assumption that facts and values inhabit distinct, unbridgeable conceptual and experiential domains has long dominated scientific and philosophical discourse, but this separation has been seriously called into question from a number of corners. The original essays here collected offer a diversity of responses to fact-value dichotomy, including contributions from Hilary Putnam and Ruth Anna Putnam who are rightly credited with revitalizing philosophical interest in this alleged opposition. Both they, and many of our contributors, are in agreement that the relationship between epistemic developments and evaluative attitudes cannot be framed as a conflict between descriptive and normative understanding. Each chapter demonstrates how and why contrapositions between science and ethics, between facts and values, and between objective and subjective are false dichotomies. Values cannot simply be separated from reason. Facts and Values will therefore prove essential reading for analytic and continental philosophers alike, for theorists of ethics and meta-ethics, and for philosophers of economics, sociology and law. Reviews "The concept of normativity spans a series of interrelated dichotomies that lie at the heart of philosophical inquiry: fact and value, is and ought, the objective and the subjective, causes and reasons, the natural world and human sensibilities. Much philosophical effort has been devoted to accentuating the gaps between the concepts juxtaposed by each of these pairs, and the fallacies involved in their conflation. This volume, however, seeks to bridge these gaps. The papers collected here—all written expressly for this volume—set out to show that normative discourse must be sensitive to the facts, and that reasoning about facts is inherently value
De Caro, M. & Macarthur, D. (eds.), The Handbook of Liberal Naturalism. London: Routledge., 2022
In this paper I shall consider the relationship between naturalism and aesthetics. In order to ad... more In this paper I shall consider the relationship between naturalism and aesthetics. In order to address this question I want to critically discuss Murray Smith’s book "Film, Art and the Third Culture" (2017) because it has the virtue of putting this question at the centre of its account of the aesthetics of film. I shall argue for two main ideas: firstly, that earning the label “non-reductive” in the setting of a scientific naturalism is a lot more problematic than Smith supposes and once one sees the difficulties that arise then the possibility of a non-scientific or liberal naturalism becomes attractive; and, secondly, whereas Smith thinks the way to thicken explanations in (film) aesthetics is to go sub-personal by invoking sub-personal neural mechanisms in the explanation of aesthetic phenomena, I suggest that such a move is optional and, in any case, philosophically problematic.
The Cambridge History of Philosophy: 1945-2015, ed. K. Becker & K.D. Thomson, 2019
Naturalism as a philosophy of nature, what it consists in, and our ways of knowing nature (so con... more Naturalism as a philosophy of nature, what it consists in, and our ways of knowing nature (so conceived) has a long history in philosophy. In the twentieth century the question of naturalism has been, for the most part, centrally concerned with the question of philosophy's relation to science, especially the natural (or "hard") sciences. Its moral is that philosophy can no longer continue to think of itself as an autonomous discipline or stance distinct from science. I will proceed by examining in some detail the naturalisms of W. V. O. Quine and David Armstrong, which seem to align as a result of a commitment to what, at first, seem the same doctrines of Physicalism, Empiricism, and Metaphysical Realism. Against this perception of near-alignment I want to argue that they do not neatly line up on the naturalist side of the long-standing opposition between idealism and naturalism. In fact, in some key respects, Quine's naturalism contains traces of idealism. The real opposition is between normativism and naturalism. I conclude by briefly contrasting two normativist positions-idealism and liberal naturalism-and come down in favour of the latter.
For a New Naturalism, Arran Gare & Wayne Hudson (eds.), Candor, NY: Telos., 2017
A Companion to Naturalism, Juliano Do Carmo (ed.), Pelotas, Brazil: Nepfil.
Australasian Philosophy Review, vol. 18 no. 2: 179–183., 2019
Philosophia, vol. 43 no. 3, 2015
Naturalism and Normativity, New York: Columbia University Press, 2010
Analisis (Spain), vol. 1 no. 1, 2014
Philo, vol. 11 no. 1, 2008
Erkenntnis, vol. 61, 2004
Naturalism and Normativity, New York: Columbia University Press, 2010
Naturalism in Question, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, Jan 1, 2004
The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy 3rd Ed., Robert Audi (ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press , 2015
European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy [Online], XII/1, 2020
Responses to Naturalism: Critical Perspective from Idealism to Pragmatism, ed. P. Giladi, 2020
The Blackwell Companion to Richard Rorty, ed. Alan Malachawski, 2020
Facts and Values: The Ethics and Metaphysics of Normativity, Giancarlo & Sarin Marchetti (eds.), London: Routledge.
Pragmatism, Kant and Transcendental Philosophy, Gabriele Gava & Robert Stern (eds.), London: Routledge., 2015
In this paper I argue for a new vision of pragmatism as democratic experimentalism, built around ... more In this paper I argue for a new vision of pragmatism as democratic experimentalism, built around an original understanding of the philosophical work done by the theory of inquiry (aka “the scientific method”) devised by Peirce and extended by James and Dewey. This conception of pragmatism involves putting aside the traditional problematic conception based on the pragmatic maxim and its various applications to truth. A major obstacle to this novel re-conception is Rorty’s paper “Pragmatism without Method”. The present paper challenges Rorty’s argument against conceiving of pragmatism as a scientific method, particularly his claim that this inevitably reduces to mere platitudes. I rebut this charge by appeal to the deep analogy between Kant’s epistemology of critique and the pragmatist method of inquiry concerning the work required to undogmatically secure rational authority for one’s beliefs.
Philosophical Topics, vol. 36 no. 1, Jan 1, 2009
New Pragmatists, Cheryl Misak (ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press. , 2007
European Journal of Analytic Philosophy, vol. 4 no. 2 , 2008
The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy 3rd Ed., Robert Audi (ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wittgenstein and Naturalism, Kevin Cahill and Thomas Raleigh (eds.), London: Routledge., 2018
Wittgenstein has often been thought to be a naturalist but the question remains: Of what kind? In... more Wittgenstein has often been thought to be a naturalist but the question remains: Of what kind? In this paper I explore this question by first placing a significant constraint on available answers: namely, that Wittgenstein's philosophy is non-doctrinal. It tracks the restlessness of human thought, being both free of metaphysics and yet full of the temptation to metaphysics. I argue that Wittgenstein can be best understood as a liberal naturalist in a dialectical and reactive vein, one both curious about and skeptical of metaphysical assertion. Wittgenstein places a great deal of emphasis on human nature – as contrasted with nature as such – particularly our animality and natural (" primitive ") reactions. The work of philosophy is the never-ending task of returning us to the natural – ordinary and extraordinary – world in which we live and act from the perennial human temptation to unnaturalness in the form of two varieties of metaphysics: supernaturalism in one direction; and scientism in the other.
Al-Mukhatabat: Special Issue on Wittgenstein, No.9, Jan 2014
Hetherington, S. (ed.) What Makes a Philosopher Great?, 2018
The Cambridge Companion to Philosophical Methodology, G. D'Oro & S. Overgaard (eds.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
The Later Wittgenstein on Language, Daniel Whiting (ed.). London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009
Psychoanalysis Downunder, 2023
Neville Symington had a passion for philosophy. When training for the priesthood – before his dis... more Neville Symington had a passion for philosophy. When training for the priesthood – before his distinguished career in psychoanalysis – he attended lectures several times a week on the topic of ontology, the metaphysical theory of Being qua Being. These lectures were a revelation: “With [the teacher George’s] help I achieved some insight into existence. I believe it has been the most important realization of my life.” Here and elsewhere Neville presents himself to his readers as devoted to the question of Being, as if, at bottom, he is a metaphysician devoted to the task of discovering and articulating a theory of the essence or nature of Being. The Neville I knew was almost the exact opposite of that. In the face of the evidence it will not be easy to explain this but that is the burden of this paper.
Aspects of Knowing, ed. S. Hetherington, Elsevier., 2006
Naturalism in Question. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004
Australasian Journal of Philosophy, vol. 81, Jan 1, 2003
Canadian Journal of Philosophy, vol. 33, Jan 1, 2003
The Monist 103/4: 370-380, 2020
Análisis, vol. 5 no. 1, 2018
In this paper I present a positive progressive picture of Putnam's philosophy. According to this ... more In this paper I present a positive progressive picture of Putnam's philosophy. According to this way of seeing things, Putnam is a normative cartographer of our linguistic practices who has over time refined his understanding of the concepts of truth and verification and their complex relationship from discourse to discourse. Looked at in this way Putnam is primarily a philosopher of objective normativity, who explores the various conceptions of objectivity with which we operate as well as resisting the excesses of both metaphysics and skepticism which do violence to our ordinary and scientific practices. However, Putnam also sees himself as a philosopher of 'reality' focused on " the realism issue " , a metaphysically inflationary way of thinking that, I argue, stands in the way of his deepest insights.
Reading Putnam, Maria Baghramian (ed.). London: Routledge, 2012
Philosophical Explorations, vol. 7, Jan 1, 2004
Philosophy in the Age of Science: Essays of Hilary Putnam. De Caro & Macarthur (eds.), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2012
The Harvard Review of Philosophy, issue 24, 2017
Sartre and Analytic Philosophy, ed. T. Morag. London: Routledge, 2023
Stanley Cavell's writings on external world skepticism (which he speaks of as “the repudiation of... more Stanley Cavell's writings on external world skepticism (which he speaks of as “the repudiation of criteria” and "an attack on the ordinary") are profound but also widely misunderstood. Part of the reason for this is Cavell's commitment to the claim that his understanding of skepticism is continuous with that of Descartes, Hume and Kant. Another is the painful ambiguity of his pronouncements on the "truth" in skepticism. In this paper I argue that key passages in Sartre's 1938 novel "Nausea" are an expression of Cavellian skepticism, and so, provide an interpretation of it. According to this Sartre-inspired reading, Cavellian skepticism is not a form of Cartesian skepticism. Cavellian skepticism is not a matter of unanswerable doubts about our knowledge of the external world. Rather, such skepticism is nihilism, the stripping of meaning and value from the world. According to this understanding, Cavellian skepticism Is closer to the post-Kantian thought of Jacobi than to Kant; and a rethinking of the relationship between skepticism and romanticism is required.
Conversations: The Journal of Cavellian Studies, Jul 2014
Morality in a Realistic Spirit: Essays for Cora Diamond, Ed. Craig Taylor and Andrew Gleeson (Routledge), 2019
SubStance, vol. 45 no. 3, 2016
Understanding Wittgenstein, Understanding Modernism, Anat Matar (ed.). London: Bloomsbury , 2017
A Companion to Philosophy in Australia and New Zealand, ed. Graham Oppy & Nick Trakakis, Monash University Press., 2010
The Modernist World, ed. Allana Lindgren & Stephen Ross. Routledge, 2015
The Philosophy of Rhythm, Peter Cheyne, Andy Hamilton & Max Paddison (eds.), Oxford, OUP, 2019
Australasian Journal of Popular Culture, 2016
Curator: The Museum Journal, 2019
In this commentary I interpret Thomas Demand’s photographic work “Modell/Model” (2000) as undermi... more In this commentary I interpret Thomas Demand’s photographic work “Modell/Model” (2000) as undermining the strong temptation to think that when we view a photograph – a light-capturing mechanism – seeing is believing. Demand provides a regress of models of models (recalling Plato’s skeptical view of art as unknowing copies of copies) that, ultimately, proves unfathomable, hence uncanny. Demand is the Socrates of contemporary art photography: here seeing is not-knowing. What we do not know is that Demand’s photograph is based on a partially erased paper and cardboard model of the scene depicted in a Nazi era photograph of a model of the German Pavilion (Hoffman, 1937) – which recalls the global ambitions of Nazism and the aesthetic connection Hitler wanted to make between neo-classical fascist architecture and the “new man” of the Third Reich.
Name of the Work, Tel Hai, Israel: Tal Hei Museum Press. , 2012
Film Philosophy, vol. 21 no. 3, 2017
Despite its oft-noted ambiguities, critical reception of Ridley Scott’s "Blade Runner" (Theatrica... more Despite its oft-noted ambiguities, critical reception of Ridley Scott’s "Blade Runner" (Theatrical Cuts (1982); Director’s Cut (1992); Final Cut (2007)) has tended to converge upon seeing it as a futuristic sci-fi film noir whose central concern is what it means to be human, a question that is fraught given the increasingly human-like replicants designed and manufactured by the Tyrell Corporation for human use on off-world colonies. Within the terms of this way of seeing things a great deal of discussion has been devoted to putative criteria of being human and the question whether the once-retired blade runner, Rick Deckard, is or is not a replicant. I aim to explore a radically different course of interpretation, which sees the film in fundamentally moral and religious terms. Put in the starkest light, the film is not about what makes us human but whether we can be saved from ourselves, from our terrifying inhumanity, our moral blindness.
Footprint: Delft Architecture Theory Journal, 2017
Two recent collections on architectural theory and practice invoke the name of pragmatism as mark... more Two recent collections on architectural theory and practice invoke the name of pragmatism as marking the hope of a new more intimate alignment of theory and practice after a period of what I call " philosophical vampirism ". This paper examines what role the philosophical tradition of pragmatism might play in relation to architecture. I argue that pragmatism is best understood as a method of overcoming intellectualist and metaphysical obstacles to clear thinking as opposed to a philosophical ideology of some kind. Against Rem Koolhaas's argument for post-‐criticality I show that we are always already critical. Pragmatism's task is to make criticism better. I end by invoking the craft ethos as articulated by Richard Sennett in his book " The Craftsman " (2001), as perhaps the best model of what a pragmatist architecture might look like.
Architectural Theory Review, 2014
Paragrana, Special Issue: "Art & Gesture", 2014
This paper is an extended meditation on Wittgenstein’s remark, “Architecture is a gesture” by way... more This paper is an extended meditation on Wittgenstein’s remark, “Architecture is a gesture” by way of a many-sided contrast and comparison with Adolf Loos’s influential architectural criticism. The paper makes the case for the artistic status of architecture according to what I call Wittgenstein’s communicative action model of art. The conception of architecture as frozen gestures is an apt metaphor for the power of architecture to express (aesthetic) ideas that glorify its purpose. The final section of the paper is a discussion of the modern architectural gesture of anti-ornamentalism.
This issue of Footprint explores the potential role of analytic philosophy in the context of arch... more This issue of Footprint explores the potential role of analytic philosophy in the context of architecture’s typical affinity with continental philosophy over the past three decades. In the last decades of the twentieth century, philosophy became an almost necessary springboard from which to define a work of architecture. Analytic philosophy took a notable backseat to continental philosophy. With this history in mind, this issue of Footprint sought to open the discussion on what might be offered by the less familiar branches of epistemology and logic that are more prevalent and developed in the analytic tradition.
The papers brought together here are situated in the context of a discipline in transformation that seeks a fundamental approach to its own tools, logic and approaches. In this realm, the approaches of logic and epistemology help to define an alternate means of criticality not subjected to personalities or the specialist knowledge of individual philosophies. Rather the various articles attempt to demonstrate that such difference of background assumptions is a common human habit and that some of the techniques of analytic philosophy may help to leap these chasms. The hope is that this is a start of a larger conversation in architecture theory that has as of yet not begun.
For full issue see:
http://footprint.tudelft.nl/
Philosophical Investigations, 2022
Philosophical Books, Jan 1, 2007
This lucid, closely argued, and stimulating book offers Horwich's latest formulation and defence ... more This lucid, closely argued, and stimulating book offers Horwich's latest formulation and defence of his Use Theory of Meaning (UTM) – a version of what is commonly called conceptual role semantics-in light of objections provoked by earlier presentations of it, especially his Meaning (1998). All but one of its chapters have appeared previously, although their contents have been modified and revised, in some cases substantially, for the current publication. Chapter 1 provides a brief overview of the philosophical issues that bear on the question of what linguistic meaning is. The second chapter is devoted to the important task of presenting the UTM. Chapter 3 argues against imposing a certain explanatory requirement on reductive accounts of meaning. Chapters 4 and 5 deal with the nature of vagueness and the normativity of meaning respectively. The sixth chapter examines the relationship between the rules that constitute word-meaning and epistemic rationality. The penultimate chapter concerns how UTM looks from the perspective of Chomskian psycho-linguistics. And the last chapter focuses on the issue of compositionality. Despite being inspired by Wittgenstein's famous reminder that meaning is use, UTM is intended to show something far stronger and more controversial than that suggests, namely, how literal semantic meaning is explained in terms of a purely naturalistic conception of use as (roughly) the disposition to accept various marks and noises or their mentalese correlates. The theory, as Horwich puts it,
Australasian Journal of Popular Culture
Jennifer A. McMahon, Elizabeth Burns Coleman, David Macarthur, James Phillips, Daniel Von Sturmer
M/C Journal
Photograph by Gonzalo Echeverria (2010)“Let us not doubt in philosophy what we do not doubt... more Photograph by Gonzalo Echeverria (2010)“Let us not doubt in philosophy what we do not doubt in our hearts.” (C. S. Peirce) Introduction Doubting has always had a somewhat bad name. A “doubting Thomas” is a pejorative term for one who doubts what he or she has not witnessed first-hand, a saying which derives originally from Thomas the Apostle’s doubting of the resurrected Christ. That doubt is the opposite of faith or conviction seems to cast doubt in a bad light. There is also the saying “He has the strength of his convictions” which seems to imply we ought correspondingly to say, “He has the weakness of his doubts”. One might recall that Socrates was likened to an electric eel because his peculiar form of questioning had the power to stun his interlocutors by crushing their pet convictions and cherished beliefs under the weight of the wise man’s reasonable doubts. Despite this bad press, however, doubting is a rational activity motivated by a vitally important concern for the...
Literature Aesthetics, Sep 27, 2011
Mind, 2001
PLACE AND EXPERIENCE A Philosophical Topography While the 'sense of place' is a familia... more PLACE AND EXPERIENCE A Philosophical Topography While the 'sense of place' is a familiar theme in poetry and art, philosophers have generally given little or no attention to place and the human relation to place. In Place and Experience, JE Malpas seeks to remedy this by ...