Medeya Margoshvili - Profile on Academia.edu (original) (raw)
Related Authors
Uploads
Papers by Medeya Margoshvili
Archetypal Concept and Contemporary Architectural Criticism
Researcher. European Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences, 2019
The article implies a critical review of the use of the term in contemporary architectural theory... more The article implies a critical review of the use of the term in contemporary architectural theory and criticism after its transmission from psychology. The term was introduced by C. G. Jung in 1919 to designate universal patterns that emanate from the unconscious, but only during the 1960s gained relative popularity within the field of architectural criticism. However, it was never particular school of Jungean architectural theoreticians but various authors that somehow applied the term, suggesting its free interpretation. The main goal of the article is not to provide an ultimate proof of existence of architectural archetypes but to trace the concept discourse within the Western perspective of architectural theory. To do so, several texts referring to C. G. Jung are analysed, mostly from the 1950s to the present day. Having analyzed the texts of several postwar architectural critics, it was concluded that different authors posited discrepant interpretations of architectural archetypes , which partly stems from the uncertainty of the very term "arche-type", for C. Jung himself fell short of providing a concrete definition for it. Yet, the question of existence of architectural archetypes still remains open.
Archetypal Concept and Contemporary Architectural Criticism, 2019
The article implies a critical review of the use of the term in contemporary architectural theory... more The article implies a critical review of the use of the term in contemporary architectural theory and criticism after its transmission from psychology. The term was introduced by C. G. Jung in 1919 to designate universal patterns that emanate from the unconscious, but only during the 1960s gained relative popularity within the field of architectural criticism. However, it was never particular school of Jungean architectural theoreticians but various authors that somehow applied the term, suggesting its free interpretation. The main goal of the article is not to provide an ultimate proof of existence of architectural archetypes but to trace the concept discourse within the Western perspective of architectural theory. To do so, several texts referring to C. G. Jung are analysed, mostly from the 1950s to the present day. Having analyzed the texts of several postwar architectural critics, it was concluded that different authors posited discrepant interpretations of architectural archetypes , which partly stems from the uncertainty of the very term "arche-type", for C. Jung himself fell short of providing a concrete definition for it. Yet, the question of existence of architectural archetypes still remains open.
Archetypal Concept and Contemporary Architectural Criticism
Researcher. European Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences, 2019
The article implies a critical review of the use of the term in contemporary architectural theory... more The article implies a critical review of the use of the term in contemporary architectural theory and criticism after its transmission from psychology. The term was introduced by C. G. Jung in 1919 to designate universal patterns that emanate from the unconscious, but only during the 1960s gained relative popularity within the field of architectural criticism. However, it was never particular school of Jungean architectural theoreticians but various authors that somehow applied the term, suggesting its free interpretation. The main goal of the article is not to provide an ultimate proof of existence of architectural archetypes but to trace the concept discourse within the Western perspective of architectural theory. To do so, several texts referring to C. G. Jung are analysed, mostly from the 1950s to the present day. Having analyzed the texts of several postwar architectural critics, it was concluded that different authors posited discrepant interpretations of architectural archetypes , which partly stems from the uncertainty of the very term "arche-type", for C. Jung himself fell short of providing a concrete definition for it. Yet, the question of existence of architectural archetypes still remains open.
Archetypal Concept and Contemporary Architectural Criticism, 2019
The article implies a critical review of the use of the term in contemporary architectural theory... more The article implies a critical review of the use of the term in contemporary architectural theory and criticism after its transmission from psychology. The term was introduced by C. G. Jung in 1919 to designate universal patterns that emanate from the unconscious, but only during the 1960s gained relative popularity within the field of architectural criticism. However, it was never particular school of Jungean architectural theoreticians but various authors that somehow applied the term, suggesting its free interpretation. The main goal of the article is not to provide an ultimate proof of existence of architectural archetypes but to trace the concept discourse within the Western perspective of architectural theory. To do so, several texts referring to C. G. Jung are analysed, mostly from the 1950s to the present day. Having analyzed the texts of several postwar architectural critics, it was concluded that different authors posited discrepant interpretations of architectural archetypes , which partly stems from the uncertainty of the very term "arche-type", for C. Jung himself fell short of providing a concrete definition for it. Yet, the question of existence of architectural archetypes still remains open.