Brian Baucom | University of the Free State (original) (raw)
Thesis Chapters by Brian Baucom
Presentations by Brian Baucom
Support 67:25 ἐθεωρήθησαν visi sunt (in)gressus tui La G , visa sunt itinera tua La] εθεωρησαν 21... more Support 67:25 ἐθεωρήθησαν visi sunt (in)gressus tui La G , visa sunt itinera tua La] εθεωρησαν 2110 α´ σ´ θ´(all three per Hi), ἐθεώρουν σ´(per Syro-Hexapla), viderunt GaHi 1 70:6 µου εἶ σκεπαστής] ει ο σκεπαστης µου Sa-2110 Ga 2 , ἐπεῖδές µε σ´; ει ο υπερασπιστης µου R: ex 30:5; cf. MT 104:28 καὶ 2º B՚ Sa R´՚ 55 ς´] οτι L A et Psalt. Rom.; και ου S GaAug var 2110 3 α´ σ´(καὶ οὐκ) θ´ ε´ Tht՚(Sy txt οὐ, Sy mg οὗ) = MT Ra 2110 and Ga Agree with Hexaplaric Interpretation of MT against OG Interpretation of MT 107:10 ὑπετάγησαν; cf. Ps 59:10] amici facti sunt = εφιλιασαν GaHi 2110([εφι]λειασαν) 4 et εβρ´ teste Sy mg , [Φυλιστιαίους] συνεταιρισθήσοµαι α΄ 5
entitled, "Lucian redivivus: Some Reflections on Barthélemy's Les Devanciers d'Aquila." 5 Since t... more entitled, "Lucian redivivus: Some Reflections on Barthélemy's Les Devanciers d'Aquila." 5 Since then, there has been considerable work done on the Antiochian text, including a critical edition of the Antiochian text for the books of Reigns. 6 Based on some recent literature, there is a divided appreciation for the Antiochian text as a witness to the OG translation. R. Timothy McLay, for instance, defends his reliance upon Vaticanus against Anneli Aejmelaeus when he writes, "Her claim must rest on the presupposition that B and its congeners are not the primary witnesses to the OG in Reigns. If not, then what are? What would one use to reconstruct the OG in the Kaige sections?" 7 Siegfried Kreuzer, on the other hand, argues that the "Lucianic text contains a large portion of old text, a text that goes back to early Jewish times and which is-as for example, Barthélemy stated-close to the OG. Therefore, it is appropriate to talk in a more neutral way about the Antiochene text." 8 As a mediating position, Law and Kauhanen note, "There is no doubt that B offers numerous OG readings in non-καίγε sections and L in καίγε, but generalizations and vague claims are unhelpful in the study of the textual history." 9 5. Unfortunately, I have not been able to consult either of these works for this essay.
Dictionary Entries by Brian Baucom
Projects by Brian Baucom
Past Projects by Brian Baucom
Analyzing and providing textual commentary on 11QPsa.
Support 67:25 ἐθεωρήθησαν visi sunt (in)gressus tui La G , visa sunt itinera tua La] εθεωρησαν 21... more Support 67:25 ἐθεωρήθησαν visi sunt (in)gressus tui La G , visa sunt itinera tua La] εθεωρησαν 2110 α´ σ´ θ´(all three per Hi), ἐθεώρουν σ´(per Syro-Hexapla), viderunt GaHi 1 70:6 µου εἶ σκεπαστής] ει ο σκεπαστης µου Sa-2110 Ga 2 , ἐπεῖδές µε σ´; ει ο υπερασπιστης µου R: ex 30:5; cf. MT 104:28 καὶ 2º B՚ Sa R´՚ 55 ς´] οτι L A et Psalt. Rom.; και ου S GaAug var 2110 3 α´ σ´(καὶ οὐκ) θ´ ε´ Tht՚(Sy txt οὐ, Sy mg οὗ) = MT Ra 2110 and Ga Agree with Hexaplaric Interpretation of MT against OG Interpretation of MT 107:10 ὑπετάγησαν; cf. Ps 59:10] amici facti sunt = εφιλιασαν GaHi 2110([εφι]λειασαν) 4 et εβρ´ teste Sy mg , [Φυλιστιαίους] συνεταιρισθήσοµαι α΄ 5
entitled, "Lucian redivivus: Some Reflections on Barthélemy's Les Devanciers d'Aquila." 5 Since t... more entitled, "Lucian redivivus: Some Reflections on Barthélemy's Les Devanciers d'Aquila." 5 Since then, there has been considerable work done on the Antiochian text, including a critical edition of the Antiochian text for the books of Reigns. 6 Based on some recent literature, there is a divided appreciation for the Antiochian text as a witness to the OG translation. R. Timothy McLay, for instance, defends his reliance upon Vaticanus against Anneli Aejmelaeus when he writes, "Her claim must rest on the presupposition that B and its congeners are not the primary witnesses to the OG in Reigns. If not, then what are? What would one use to reconstruct the OG in the Kaige sections?" 7 Siegfried Kreuzer, on the other hand, argues that the "Lucianic text contains a large portion of old text, a text that goes back to early Jewish times and which is-as for example, Barthélemy stated-close to the OG. Therefore, it is appropriate to talk in a more neutral way about the Antiochene text." 8 As a mediating position, Law and Kauhanen note, "There is no doubt that B offers numerous OG readings in non-καίγε sections and L in καίγε, but generalizations and vague claims are unhelpful in the study of the textual history." 9 5. Unfortunately, I have not been able to consult either of these works for this essay.
Analyzing and providing textual commentary on 11QPsa.