‘The British World during the First World War: Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the question of Japan’ (original) (raw)
An examination of the attitude of the Pacific Dominions to Japan during the First World War indicates that each of the Dominions followed a path from heeding the Imperial government’s advice not to be too critical of its Far Eastern ally in the early stages of the war to giving voice to increasing concern about Japanese penetration into the Pacific as the war progressed. I focus on Japanese military mobilization at the outbreak of war, its takeover of the German Pacific colonies north of the equator, and its insistence on keeping them at the end of the war. These three episodes indicate that Dominion attitudes to Japan sometimes actually influenced the making of British foreign policy. There were points where the British government clearly tried to take on concerns from Australia, Canada and New Zealand in its position towards Japan. A good example of this is the British government’s attempts to secure the Japanese government’s support in issuing a joint statement that the latter was not planning on seizing former German colonies in the Pacific that the Dominions intended to deal with themselves in the early stages of the war. But there were also other periods where the realities of great power politics meant that the three Dominions had to accept the position adopted by the Imperial government.
Related papers
The limits of Empire: Australia, eastern appeasement and the drift to war in the Pacific, 1937–41
2018
Despite Australia’s regional security interests being intimately involved in the Pacific War, scholarship often portrays the nation as uninvolved in preparations for the imminent regional conflict. Rather, Australia ‘suffered from a chronic lack of self-reliance’, looking instinctively to the British Empire and the security it afforded. This article proposes that in the years 1937–41, the Australian government – first under Joseph Lyons and then Robert Menzies – recognised both the immediacy of the Japanese threat and the limitations of imperial defence plans and accordingly responded with a concerted policy for the coming regional conflict. The principal focus of this article is Australia’s position towards Japan and the implied pragmatic appraisal by Australia of the strategic value of diplomacy in maintaining regional stability. In the context of this growing assertiveness, this article also considers broader tensions in the Australian–British relationship, tensions centred on each nation’s respective and divergent position towards Japan. In this way, this article is more than just an examination of strategic appraisals, rearmament and diplomacy. It seeks to comment on Australian geopolitics, its relations with great powers, and the challenge of balancing national interests.
Despite Australia's national interests being directly involved in the Pacific War, existing scholarly portrayals range from a nation pitifully underprepared and entirely dependent upon Britain for protection and policy direction, to a "Great Betrayal" of Australia by Britain. This paper will challenge such perceptions, examining Britain's inadequate strategic planning for the Pacific and the manner in which this growing insecurity encouraged Australia to pursue greater assertiveness in policy making. Developments between 1937-41 are examined with a particular reference to the strategic and diplomatic measures adopted by Australia in a bid to better position its interests and prepare for an imminent regional conflict. Namely, these measures were a balancing of rearmament and a conciliatory position towards an increasingly belligerent Japan. This paper speaks to the theme of Entangled Histories through its examination of Australia's position as an Anglocentric nation and member of the British Empire, whose immediate strategic interests lay in the Asia-Pacific region. This paper will consider the challenges implicit in attempts to maintain national interests when these interests exist in two vastly different geopolitical spheres. In this way, this paper contributes to a broader understanding of the factors shaping the practice of Australian foreign policy.
International Journal of Maritime History
The Anglo-Japanese Alliance of 1905 was a watershed moment for the presence of the Royal Navy in the Pacific. Although it allowed the Royal Navy to concentrate its fleets in European waters, this strategy caused resentment due to the underlying fear of the ‘Yellow Peril’, especially in the British dominions of Australia and New Zealand. The Anglo-Japanese Alliance presented some challenges to the received Edwardian racial hierarchy and the idea of British military supremacy. This article demonstrates how the ‘port town’ not only became a place of mediation where high-level international diplomacy mingled with the face-to-face experience of an alliance ‘in practice’, but also a space through which issues such as Otherness and imperial security were contested and explored.
Studies in the Anglo-Japanese Alliance, 1902-1923
2003
The centenary of the Anglo-Japanese Alliance (1902-1923) was celebrated during 2002 and its demise eighty years ago has to be recorded in 2003. During the centenary various conferences were held, the papers heard at the one at STICERD being included in International Studies pamphlet IS/02/432. A further conference was held in Tokyo under the auspices of the Japanese Research Group on 25-26 May 2002. Some of the British papers at the conference, two of which were written by members of STICERD, have been revised and extended and now appear with the permission of their authors and the conference organizer. They are intended to look beyond the narrow diplomatic aspects of the alliance and interpret it from the perspectives of media coverage, economics and global international relations. It is hoped that the papers will be useful for those who were not fortunate enough to attend the conference.
The British Peace Treaty with Japan was not just a security measure to prevent Japanese remilitarization, but also a document expressing Britain's economic realpolitik. Britain was less concerned about stabilizing the Cold War and more devoted to decapitating Japan to prevent the latter from becoming a formidable threat to the British Commonwealth. The consistent preservation of the clauses concerning China suggests that Britain was willing to introduce Chinese interests in the Treaty because Britain was less concerned about China as a Communist country than China and Hong Kong as traditional markets for selling British goods. A full administration of victor's justice towards Japan and the pursuit of economic realpolitik towards China and Hong Kong as valuable markets had a higher priority than maintaining an anti-Communist solidarity with the United States. For Britain, the solidarity and protection of her empire and market interests were far more important than a comparatively more nebulous protection of the "Free World" against Communism. Rezumat. Tratatul de pace încheiat între Anglia şi Japonia nu a însemnat doar o măsură de securitate pentru a preveni remilitarizarea japoneză ci a avut rolul de a fi un document care exprimă o viziune de realpolitik economic a Marii Britanii. Regatul Unit a fost mai puţin preocupat de stabilizarea Războiului Rece şi a fost foarte concentrat pe monitorizarea evoluţiei Japoniei pentru ca aceasta să nu devină o ameninţare reală pentru Commonwealth-ul britanic. Menţionarea consecventă a clauzelor referitoare la China sugerează că Marea Britanie era dispusă să introducă interesele chineze în tratat deoarece Regatul Unit era mai puţin preocupat de China şi Hong Kong ca pieţe tradiţionale Kyu-hyun Jo 182 pentru vânzarea mărfurilor britanice. O administrare deplină a drepturilor învingătorilor faţă de Japonia şi urmărirea intereselor economice au definit noua ordine postbelică. Prin urmare realismul economic faţă de China şi Hong Kong ca pieţe de interes aveau o prioritate mai mare decât menţinerea unei solidarităţi anticomuniste în raport cu Statele Unite. Pentru Marea Britanie, solidaritatea şi protecţia imperiului propriu şi a intereselor pieţei au reprezentat o miză mult mai importantă decât o protecţie relativ mai nesigură a Lumii Libere împotriva comunismului.
Japan Forum, 2016
Great Britain was the first of the major Powers that revised its unequal treaty with Japan, recognizing the success of Japan's modernization and its growing role in the international arena. However, British Columbia perceived Japanese residents as a threat to 'the British character' of this regions' population profile. After the movement against Japanese residents in British Columbia peaked during the anti-Japanese riots in Vancouver in September of 1907, Canadian Minister of Labor Rodolphe Lemieux headed a diplomatic delegation to Tokyo to negotiate the restriction of Japanese immigration to Canada. The dispatch of this mission revealed some of the complexities in relations between the Colonial and Foreign Offices in London on the one hand and the Dominion's and British Columbian governments on the other. Based on previously unused primary sources, this article will examine the interplay between the policy towards Japanese migrants in the British Dominion of Canada and the British policy towards Japan as a nation.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.