Some Mother's Child Has Gone Astray': Neuroscientific Approaches to a Therapeutic Jurisprudence Model of Juvenile Sentencing (original) (raw)
“Some Mother's Child Has Gone Astray”: Neuroscientific Approaches to a Therapeutic Jurisprudence Model of Juvenile Sentencing1
Michael Perlin
Family Court Review
View PDFchevron_right
Using Therapeutic Jurisprudence to Bridge the Juvenile Justice and Mental Health Systems
Gene Griffin
University of Cincinnati law review. University of Cincinnati. College of Law
View PDFchevron_right
Unformed Minds: Juveniles, Neuroscience and the Law
Oren Harman
Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences
View PDFchevron_right
Juvenile Justice, Sullivan, and Graham: How the Supreme Court’s Decision Will Change the Neuroscience Debate
Johanna Jennings
Duke Law Technology Review, 2010
View PDFchevron_right
Yonder Stands Your Orphan with His Gun': The International Human Rights and Therapeutic Jurisprudence Implications of Juvenile Punishment Schemes
Michael Perlin
View PDFchevron_right
The Right to Redemption: Juvenile Dispositions and Sentences
Katherine Federle
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2016
View PDFchevron_right
Nobody Made the Connection: Neurodisability in the youth justice system. Published by the Office of the Children's Commissioner for England
Luke Mounce
View PDFchevron_right
Children & the Law I: Editorial
Carlos Peixoto
Revista de Psicología, 2015
View PDFchevron_right
Neurobiology and the law: A role in juvenile justice
Staci Gruber
Ohio St. J. Crim. L., 2005
View PDFchevron_right
The nexus between sentencing and rehabilitation in the Children's Court of NSW
Sumitra Vignaendra
View PDFchevron_right
Due Process and the Juvenile System: The Effects of In Re Gault
Steven Samson
1980
View PDFchevron_right
Neurodisability in the youth justice system: recognising and responding to the criminalisation of neurodevelopmental impairment
Nathan Hughes
View PDFchevron_right
Book Review: Aaron Kupchik: Judging Juveniles: Prosecuting Adolescents in Adult and Juvenile Courts. New York: New York University Press, 2006, 224 pp. $22.00 (pbk). ISBN 0814747744
Jamie J Fader
Theoretical Criminology, 2008
View PDFchevron_right
Procedural justice for juveniles: A human rights and developmental psychology perspective
Ton Liefaard, Stephanie Rap
2011
View PDFchevron_right
A Glimpse Inside the Brain’s Black Box: Understanding the Role of Neuroscience in Criminal Sentencing
Bernice Donald
Fordham Law Review, 2016
View PDFchevron_right
The “True” Juvenile Offender: Age Effects and Juvenile Court Sanctioning
Brian Stults, Daniel Mears
View PDFchevron_right
Reforming Juvenile Justice: A Developmental Approach
Julie Schuck
CrimRxiv, 2013
View PDFchevron_right
The Supreme Court and the Sentencing of Juveniles in the United States: Reaffirming the Distinctiveness of Youth
David Siegel
Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 2011
View PDFchevron_right
The Minimum Age of Criminal Responsibility: Clinical, Criminological/Sociological, Developmental and Legal Perspectives
Barry Goldson
Youth Justice, 2013
View PDFchevron_right
Charting a New Course for Juvenile Justice: Listening to Outsiders
steven drizin
The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1973-), 1999
View PDFchevron_right
Applying Roper v. Simmons in juvenile transfer and waiver proceedings: a legal and neuroscientific inquiry
John Fabian
International journal of offender therapy and comparative criminology, 2011
View PDFchevron_right
Punishment, Accountability, and the New Juvenile Justice
Martha-Elin Blomquist
Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 1992
View PDFchevron_right
How Should Justice Policy Treat Young Offenders
Kim Taylor-Thompson
2017
View PDFchevron_right
Evidence-Based Practice and Juvenile Justice
Donna Bishop
Criminology & Public Policy, 2012
View PDFchevron_right
Criminal Behavior and the Brain: When Law and Neuroscience Collide
Deborah W Denno
View PDFchevron_right
Developmental Psycho- Neurological Research Trends and Their Importance for Reassessing Key Decision-Making Assumptions for Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults in Juvenile/Youth and Adult Criminal Justice Systems
Raymond Corrado
Bergen Journal of Criminal Law & Criminal Justice, 2014
View PDFchevron_right
Adjusting the Bright-Line Age of Accountability within the Criminal Justice System: Raising the Age of Majority to Age 21 Based on the Conclusions of Scientific Studies regarding Neurological Development and Culpability of Young-Adult Offenders
Carly Loomis-Gustafson
2017
View PDFchevron_right
How Courts in Criminal Cases Respond to Childhood Trauma
Deborah W Denno
2019
View PDFchevron_right
NEUROSCIENCE: Crime, Culpability, and the Adolescent Brain
Mary Beckman
Science, 2004
View PDFchevron_right
Reforming Juvenile Justice
Frieder Duenkel
Springer eBooks, 2009
View PDFchevron_right
‘One Can Always Say NO.’ Enriching the Bioethical Debate on Antisocial Behaviour, Neurobiology and Prevention: Views of Juvenile Delinquents
Dorothee Horstkötter
Bioethics, 2012
View PDFchevron_right
Cracking down on juveniles: The changing ideology of youth corrections
Martha-Elin Blomquist
Notre Dame JL Ethics & Pub. Pol'y, 1990
View PDFchevron_right
Balancing punitive and rehabilitative approaches to juvenile justice
Bharti Ali
View PDFchevron_right
The Mentally-Disordered Juvenile Offender: An Inquiry Into the Treatment of The Kids Nobody Wants
Evan McKenzie
Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 1979
View PDFchevron_right