Analytical evaluation of HCV core antigen and interest for HCV screening in haemodialysis patients (original) (raw)
Related papers
in Vivo, 2023
Background/Aim: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) core antigen (Ag) test has been increasingly applied as an effective alternative to conventional molecular tests allowing rapid and affordable diagnosis, which is of paramount relevance to achieve global elimination of HCV infection. Materials and Methods: ARCHITECT ® HCV Ag test was evaluated in comparison with HCV RNA quantification test (CAP/CTM) to calculate its sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and to determine their correlation level. Its performance, according to low and high viral load values and in different treatment stages [during treatment (T), at the end of the therapeutic protocol (EOT) and when sustained virological response (SVR) was evaluated]. Results: In total, 145 samples were included. Considering CAP/CTM, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of the HCV-Ag test were 88.9%, 99.1%, 97.0% and 96.4%, respectively, and the correlation among tests was high (r=0.890), with only five discordant results. A decrease in sensitivity was found for low viral load values (<1,000 IU/ml), but the opposite was verified for high viral concentrations (≥1,000 IU/ml). A good agreement was verified for the T and EOT groups (k=0.789 and k=0.638) and an excellent agreement in the SVR group (k=1.000). Conclusion: HCV-Ag seems to be an effective alternative that can be routinely combined with other faster and more accessible tests (e.g., HCV antibody tests) for the identification of new HCV infections in suspected patients, eventually reserving the molecular techniques for samples with discordant results.
Portuguese Journal of Nephrology & Hypertension
Portugal, in 2016, there were 293 cases of chronic infection in hemodialysis patients, treated or in treatment. 5. According to the current international guidelines, CKD patients ever treated by hemodialysis are recommended to be screened for HCV infection 11 , starting with the search for anti-HCV antibodies both for screening and clinical diagnosis of an HCV infection. 12,13 The Portuguese Doctors Society 2017 Chronic Dialysis Good Practice Manual also recommends the screening of all hemodialysis patients using anti-HCV Ab on admission, readmission and, if negative, biannually. Table 1 explains the screening algorithm proposed in those guidelines. 11 Diagnostic assays for HCV may be categorized into (a) first-level (enzyme immunoassays with different format) and second-level
Patients Screened by Two Methods; HCV Core Antigen and Polymerase Chain Reaction
Hepatitis Monthly, 2013
Background: End-stage renal disease patients on chronic hemodialysis are among high risk groups for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection for whom routine HCV screening is recommended. Anti-HCV antibody (ab) testing may not be reliable to detect all infected cases because of the blunted ab response due to depressed immune state in these patients. Using a more reliable, cost-effective and non-complex HCV screening test may be necessary in this group of patients for case finding and management, and also for prevention of infection spread. Objectives: The aim of this study was to find the prevalence of HCV infection in HCV ab negative hemodialysis patients by Real time PCR and total HCV core antigen (ag) test and comparing the results of the two tests. Patients and Methods: From a single hemodialysis center, 181 anti-HCV ab negative patients were screened by total HCV core ag using an ELISA kit. Real time PCR was used for determination of the virus and viral load quantity. Results: Among the 181 anti-HCV ab negative patients, 13 (7.2%) were positive for HCV core ag and 11 (6%) had detectable HCV RNA with a range of 40-336543 IU/ml by PCR. The two tests had a high measurement agreement (Kappa=0.82, P<0.001). Of the 13 patients with positive HCV core ag test results, 3 were negative for HCV RNA. Considering real time PCR for HCV RNA as the gold standard for HCV infection determination in this patient population, HCV core ag assay yielded a sensitivity of 90.9%, specificity of 98.2%, positive predictive value of 76.9% and negative predictive value of 99.4%. Discussion: The rate of HCV infection among HCV ab negative hemodialysis patients was high. HCV core ag testing could be used as a sensitive method for HCV infection screening in this group of patients.
BMC Nephrology, 2020
Background: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infects more than 71 million people worldwide and chronic HCV infection increases the risk of liver cirrhosis and failure. Haemodialysis (HD) is one of the renal replacement therapies with risk of HCV transmission. Anti-HCV antibodies are the serological screening test for HCV infection that does not detect active phase of infection. Majority HCV infected HD patients in Malaysia do not have further HCV RNA performed due to high cost and thus HCV treatment is less frequently offered. HCV Core Antigen (HCV Ag) can potentially be used to diagnose active HCV infection in HD population in comparison to HCV RNA, at lower cost. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study to assess the correlation between HCV Ag and HCV RNA and to identify the prevalence of active HCV infection among HCV seropositive HD patients from dialysis centres across West Malaysia from July 2019 to May 2020. Pre-dialysis blood was taken and tested for both HCV Ag and HCV RNA tests. HCV Ag was tested with Abbott ARCHITECT HCV Ag test. Results: We recruited 112 seropositive HD patients from 17 centres with mean age of 54.04 ± 11.62 years, HD vintage of 14.1 ± 9.7 years, and male constitute 59.8% (67) of the study population. HCV Ag correlates well with HCV RNA (Spearman test coefficient 0.833, p < 0.001). The sensitivity was 90.7%, specificity 100%, positive predictive value (PPV) 100%, negative predictive value (NPV) 76.5%, and accuracy 92.9%. For HCV RNA level > 3000 IU/mL, HCV Ag had a higher sensitivity of 95.1% and greater correlation (Spearman test coefficient 0.897, p < 0.001). The prevalence of active HCV infection was 76.8% among HCV seropositive HD patients. Conclusions: Although HCV Ag is less sensitive, it shows an excellent correlation with HCV RNA and has 100% PPV. HCV Ag can be considered as an alternative diagnostic tool for chronic active HCV infection among HD cohort, who can then be considered for HCV treatment. For seropositive HD patient with negative HCV Ag, we recommend to follow-up with HCV RNA test.
Journal of Clinical Virology, 2004
Background: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is frequently a silent infection in hemodialysis (HD) patients with a prevalence of 8-10%. Improving HCV detection in this population prior to transplantation is critical both for infection control and optimal patient care. Objectives: To assess the current HCV testing practice of the National Institute for Transplantation (PCR testing of enzyme immunoassay (EIA) positive HD patients) by evaluating a subset of EIA positive and EIA negative samples with the VERSANT ® HCV RNA Qualitative Assay based on transcription mediated amplification (HCV Qual (TMA)) (sensitivity ≤9.6 IU/ml) and in-house PCR (HCV Qual (PCR)) (sensitivity ∼149 IU/ml). Study design: 2321 HD patients were screened by Abbott HCV EIA 2.0. A subset of 80/169 E IA positive samples and 100/2152 EIA negative samples were tested by both assays. TMA/PCR discordant samples were genotyped. Results: PCR and TMA gave concordant results in 67/80 (83.8%) of EIA positive samples. 11/80 (14.7%) were reactive by HCV Qual (TMA), but not by HCV Qual (PCR); 2/80 (2.7%) were reactive by HCV Qual (PCR), but not by HCV Qual (TMA). 2/100 (2%) EIA negative samples were reactive and 95/100 (95%) were non-reactive by both assays. Three (3%) were only HCV Qual (TMA) reactive. 11/14 TMA+/PCR-samples with sufficient volume were genotyped. Conclusions: HCV Qual (TMA) identified active HCV infection in more EIA positive and EIA negative patients than HCV Qual (PCR) and should be part of our testing algorithm.
Performance attributes of the LCx® HCV RNA quantitative assay
Journal of Virological Methods, 2004
The LCx ® HCV RNA quantitative assay (Abbott Laboratories, North Chicago, IL) is designed to use competitive reverse transcriptasepolymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and microparticle enzyme immunoassay (MEIA), in combination with a modified Qiagen sample preparation method, to measure the level of hepatitis C virus (HCV) in human plasma and serum. The assay provides quantitative results in international units (IU) of HCV RNA/ml, in copies of HCV RNA/ml, or their log (base 10) equivalents. A conversion study determined that 1 IU equals 4.3 copies. The LCx HCV assay detected HCV RNA transcripts representative of genotypes 1-6 with near equal efficiency. The assay did not cross-react with high concentrations of 21 potentially cross-reactive microorganisms or with 100 HCV-negative specimens. The lower limit of detection was demonstrated to be 23 IU/ml. The LCx assay had similar sensitivity to the Roche Amplicor HCV (version 2.0) qualitative assay when used to test panels containing 6, 12, 23, and 47 IU/ml. The assay linear range was shown to extend from 23 to 2.3 million IU/ml. The intra-assay standard deviation (S.D.) was ≤0.066 log IU/ml for the four HCV positive samples tested, while for the same samples the observed inter-assay S.D. was ≤0.075 log IU/ml. The overall mean assay quantitation value for seven HCV-positive WHO-standardized Acrometrix NAP linearity panel members was within 0.06 log IU/ml of the mean assigned value. The assay was demonstrated to correlate acceptably against the Roche Amplicor HCV monitor test (version 2.0). These data suggest that the assay is standardized appropriately against the WHO standard across its linear range and can be used for quantitation of HCV. In addition, with a sensitivity of 23 IU/ml, the assay can be used to determine if post-therapy viral clearance has occurred.
Enfermedades infecciosas y microbiologia clinica, 2017
Detection of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA and the HCV core antigen assay (HCV-Ag) are reliable techniques for the diagnosis of active and chronic HCV infection. Our aim was to evaluate the HCV-Ag assay as an alternative to quantification of HVC RNA. A comparison was made of the sensitivity and specificity of an HCV-Ag assay (204 serum samples) with those of a PCR assay, and the correlation between the two techniques was determined. The sensitivity and specificity of HCV-Ag was 76.6% and 100%, respectively. Both assays were extremely well correlated (Pearson coefficient=0.951). The formula (LogCV=1.15*LogAg+2.26) was obtained to calculate the viral load by PCR from HCV-Ag values. HCV-Ag was unable to detect viral loads below 5000IU/mL. Although the HCV-Ag assay was less sensitive than the PCR assay, the correlation between both assays was excellent. HCV-Ag can be useful as a first step in the diagnosis of acute or chronic HCV infection and in emergency situations.
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 2003
We report the results of a multicenter evaluation of a new assay for the detection of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA in human serum or plasma based on transcription-mediated amplification (HCV TMA). Analysis of combined data obtained from 15 independent sites, including 4 sites in the United States and 11 in Europe, by using preproduction kits showed a limit of detection of 9.8 IU/ml and an overall mean specificity of 97.9%. In addition, assay runs and samples were valid consistently (97.8% of assay runs and 98.0% of specimen results). Of the 15 sites that participated in the multicenter evaluation, 2 subsequently carried out additional performance studies with production kits in support of the assay's registration in France. Comparison of the findings from these two sites during the multicenter evaluation and during the registration studies showed an overall improvement in assay performance. A statistically significant (P < 0.001) improvement was achieved for both specificity and specimen validity in the registration studies, which were 99.4 and 98.1%, respectively. Combined data from the two sites showed a lower limit of detection of approximately 2.4 IU/ml and an improved assay validity of 100%, although the sample size was too small to show statistical significance at the 0.05 level. In summary, the performance characteristics of HCV TMA indicate that this assay is a reliable tool for the detection of HCV RNA in serum or plasma. Improvement in assay performance has been demonstrated with refinement of assay reagents, instrumentation, and operator experience.
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 2004
The British Columbia Center for Disease Control laboratory performs approximately 95% of all hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody tests for the province's 4 million inhabitants. In 2002, the laboratory tested 96,000 specimens for anti-HCV antibodies, of which 4,800 (5%) were seroreactive and required confirmation of active infection. Although HCV RNA assays with a sensitivity of 50 IU/ml or less are recommended for the confirmation of active HCV infection, given the large number of seroreactive specimens tested annually, we evaluated the Ortho trak-C assay (OTCA) as a second-line confirmatory test and determined its limit of detection (LoD). Of 502 specimens from treatment-naïve anti-HCV-positive individuals, 478 had sufficient volumes for evaluation by the OTCA and HCV RNA tests. Core antigen was not detected in 147 of 478 (30.8%) of these specimens, of which 37 of 147 (25.2%) were shown to be viremic by the VERSANT HCV (version 3.0) (branched-DNA) assay and/or the VERSANT HCV qualitative assay. Testing of 144 replicates of a World Health Organization standard dilution series indicated that the LoD of OTCA was ϳ27,000 IU/ml. This LoD is consistent with the inability of OTCA to detect core antigen in clinical specimens with low viral loads. We conclude that OTCA has limited value as a confirmatory test for the diagnosis of active HCV infection because 37 of 367 (10%) of viremic specimens had undetectable core antigen. Qualitative HCV RNA testing remains the present standard for the confirmation of active HCV infection in the diagnostic setting.
Evaluation of the Abbott RealTime HCV assay for quantitative detection of hepatitis C virus RNA
Journal of Clinical Virology, 2007
Background: The Abbott RealTime HCV assay for quantitative detection of HCV RNA has recently been introduced. Objectives: In this study, the performance of the Abbott RealTime HCV assay was evaluated and compared to the COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan HCV test. Study design: Accuracy, linearity, interassay and intra-assay variations were determined, and a total of 243 routine clinical samples were investigated.