Improved detection of HCV Infection in hemodialysis patients using a new HCV RNA qualitative assay: experience of a transplant center (original) (raw)
Related papers
Patients Screened by Two Methods; HCV Core Antigen and Polymerase Chain Reaction
Hepatitis Monthly, 2013
Background: End-stage renal disease patients on chronic hemodialysis are among high risk groups for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection for whom routine HCV screening is recommended. Anti-HCV antibody (ab) testing may not be reliable to detect all infected cases because of the blunted ab response due to depressed immune state in these patients. Using a more reliable, cost-effective and non-complex HCV screening test may be necessary in this group of patients for case finding and management, and also for prevention of infection spread. Objectives: The aim of this study was to find the prevalence of HCV infection in HCV ab negative hemodialysis patients by Real time PCR and total HCV core antigen (ag) test and comparing the results of the two tests. Patients and Methods: From a single hemodialysis center, 181 anti-HCV ab negative patients were screened by total HCV core ag using an ELISA kit. Real time PCR was used for determination of the virus and viral load quantity. Results: Among the 181 anti-HCV ab negative patients, 13 (7.2%) were positive for HCV core ag and 11 (6%) had detectable HCV RNA with a range of 40-336543 IU/ml by PCR. The two tests had a high measurement agreement (Kappa=0.82, P<0.001). Of the 13 patients with positive HCV core ag test results, 3 were negative for HCV RNA. Considering real time PCR for HCV RNA as the gold standard for HCV infection determination in this patient population, HCV core ag assay yielded a sensitivity of 90.9%, specificity of 98.2%, positive predictive value of 76.9% and negative predictive value of 99.4%. Discussion: The rate of HCV infection among HCV ab negative hemodialysis patients was high. HCV core ag testing could be used as a sensitive method for HCV infection screening in this group of patients.
Analytical evaluation of HCV core antigen and interest for HCV screening in haemodialysis patients
Journal of Clinical Virology, 2010
Background: It is important to diagnose a hepatitis C virus infection in the acute phase in order to reduce the incidence of this infection in high-risk populations like haemodialysis patients. But detection systems for serum HCV antibodies are insensitive in the acute phase because of the long serological window. Previous studies showed that the HCV core antigen (HCV Ag) may be an alternative to HCV RNA in this context. Objectives: To evaluate the performances of the new Abbott ARCHITECT ® HCV Ag test and its usefulness in screening for HCV infections in haemodialysis patients. Study design: The serum HCV Ag titre was compared to the HCV RNA viral load in 98 samples from HCVinfected patients to determine the correlation between the two markers and the influence of genotype. We screened 2752 patients from 37 French haemodialysis units who tested negative for HCV antibodies using the HCV Ag and RNA assays. Results: The HCV Ag titre was correlated with the HCV RNA (Spearman test coefficient 0.9041, p < 0.0001) and all genotypes and subtypes were detected. The HCV Ag and HCV RNA results agreed well for haemodialysis patients. Diagnostic specificity of HCV Ag was high (99.2%) considering HCV RNA as the reference. The two seronegative patients (of 2752) who were HCV RNA positive were also HCV Ag positive. Conclusions: The ARCHITECT ® HCV Ag test is a reliable, highly specific assay for screening acute HCV infections in haemodialysis units. It is a robust alternative to HCV RNA testing.
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 2003
We report the results of a multicenter evaluation of a new assay for the detection of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA in human serum or plasma based on transcription-mediated amplification (HCV TMA). Analysis of combined data obtained from 15 independent sites, including 4 sites in the United States and 11 in Europe, by using preproduction kits showed a limit of detection of 9.8 IU/ml and an overall mean specificity of 97.9%. In addition, assay runs and samples were valid consistently (97.8% of assay runs and 98.0% of specimen results). Of the 15 sites that participated in the multicenter evaluation, 2 subsequently carried out additional performance studies with production kits in support of the assay's registration in France. Comparison of the findings from these two sites during the multicenter evaluation and during the registration studies showed an overall improvement in assay performance. A statistically significant (P < 0.001) improvement was achieved for both specificity and specimen validity in the registration studies, which were 99.4 and 98.1%, respectively. Combined data from the two sites showed a lower limit of detection of approximately 2.4 IU/ml and an improved assay validity of 100%, although the sample size was too small to show statistical significance at the 0.05 level. In summary, the performance characteristics of HCV TMA indicate that this assay is a reliable tool for the detection of HCV RNA in serum or plasma. Improvement in assay performance has been demonstrated with refinement of assay reagents, instrumentation, and operator experience.
Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis, 1999
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) serotyping assays have evolved from simple antibody screening tests to complex RNA-based qualitative and quantitative methods. The objective of this study was to compare the HCV screening results from 161 patients in long-term maintenance haemodialysis (HD) as assessed by the recently developed Enzyme Linked Immunosorbant Assay III (ELISA III), confirmed by the Recombinant Immunoblot 3 rd generation assay (RIBA 3 rd ) and determined by the qualitative HCV reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) method. One hundred sixty-one HD patients were tested for the presence of anti-HCV antibodies by the ELISA III and confirmed by the RIBA 3 rd . HCV RNA was determined by an HCV RT-PCR method. All reported results that were designated as discrepant, anti-HCV (+) and/or HCV RNA (+) were further investigated by means of a quantitative HCV RT-PCR assay. Reported results obtained from ELISA III and qualitative RT-PCR assays were HCV positive for 16/161 patients (9,93%) and these were designated as anti-HCV (+)/HCV RNA (+). Subsequently, these 16 anti-HCV positive/161 HD patients were confirmed by the RIBA 3 rd . Three individuals anti-HCV (-)/RIBA (+)/ HCV RNA (-)], the viral load that was reported from the quantitative RT-PCR was less than the assay detection level (< 2,000 viral copies/ml). In view of previous observations, our findings suggest that ELISA III remains still a highly reliable and valuable assay. However, despite the cost, the combination of both ELISA III and qualitative RT-PCR allows a definitive classification on HCV diagnosis.
Nephro-Urology Monthly, 2017
Background: Hemodialysis is one of the renal replacement therapies in patients with end-stage renal failure. The current study aimed at identifying the prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in hemodialysis population, and comparing serological (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) and molecular (polymerase chain reaction) methods to detect HCV infection in North of Iran. Methods: Serum samples from 162 patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis were collected in 2 hemodialysis units of Sari city (North of Iran). HCV RNAs were isolated from samples using RIBO-prep nucleic acid extraction kit (AmpliSens®, Russia). Total RNAs were extracted from samples and real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed using HCV-FRT PCR kit (AmpliSense, Russia) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Results: In the study, 7 (4.3%) cases were HCV-Ab positive and 155 (95.7%) HCV-Ab negative. Additionally, 11 patients (6.8%) were HCV-PCR positive, while 151 (93.2%) were HCV-PCR negative. Among 11 HCV-PCR positive patients, 7 (63.6%) were HCV-Ab positive and 4 (36.4%) were HCV-ab negative. HCV-ab test was not positive in any of the HCV-PCR negative patients. Conclusions: The results showed that the specificity of HCV-RNA detection was significantly higher than that of the conventional HCV-ab test. The gold standard test to confirm HCV positive should be PCR method.
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 2002
Reference Testing Laboratory HCV RNA transcription-mediated amplification assay (HCV TMA) were compared for analytical sensitivity, clinical performance, and workflow. Limits of detection were determined by testing dilutions of the World Health Organization HCV standard in replicates of 15 at concentrations of from 1.0 to 70 IU/ml. The limit of detection of the HCV PCR assay was calculated to be 45 IU/ml on initial testing and 32 IU/ml after resolution of gray zone results. The calculated limit of detection for HCV TMA was 6 IU/ml. To compare clinical performance, 300 specimens, grouped as follows, were evaluated: 112 samples that were indeterminate in an anti-HCV enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and for which HCV RNA was not detected by HCV PCR; 79 samples that were EIA positive and for which HCV RNA was not detected by HCV PCR; and 105 samples that were both EIA and HCV PCR positive. For these groups, interassay concordance ranged from 96.2% to 100%. In addition, three HCV PCR gray zone specimens and one neonatal specimen were also evaluated. A 64-sample run (full run, 91 specimens) required 5 h for testing by HCV TMA, whereas almost 8 h were required to test a full run of 22 specimens by HCV PCR. HCV TMA demonstrated excellent concordance with HCV PCR when clinical samples were tested. However, HCV TMA was more sensitive than HCV PCR, required less time for test result completion, and had a greater throughput.
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 2005
Here we compared two quantitative assays, the COBAS AMPLICOR HCV Monitor 2.0 assay (Roche Diagnostics) and the branched DNA-based VERSANT HCV RNA 3.0 assay (Bayer Diagnostics) for HCV RNA measurement in 344 samples derived from 120 patients with chronic genotype 1 HCV infection. The overall concordance between the results of the two tests was 95%, and the HCV RNA titers within the dynamic ranges of the assays correlated very well (r 2 ؍ 0.86). Furthermore, both tests performed equally well in determining an early viral response at week 1 or 4 during antiviral therapy. We also compared two qualitative HCV RNA detection assays: the COBAS AMPLICOR HCV 2.0 assay versus the transcription-mediated amplification (TMA)-based VERSANT HCV RNA qualitative assay. Stored samples from sustained responders to interferon-ribavirin therapy were retested by the HCV TMA assay and were found to contain no detectable HCV RNA, demonstrating complete concordance between the results of PCR and TMA. However, HCV RNA was detected by the TMA assay in end-of-treatment (ETR) samples from 33% of patients with relapses who were HCV RNA negative according to the COBAS AMPLICOR assay. This observation suggests that a TMA assay can lead to a more correct definition of the ETR response.
BMC Nephrology, 2020
Background: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infects more than 71 million people worldwide and chronic HCV infection increases the risk of liver cirrhosis and failure. Haemodialysis (HD) is one of the renal replacement therapies with risk of HCV transmission. Anti-HCV antibodies are the serological screening test for HCV infection that does not detect active phase of infection. Majority HCV infected HD patients in Malaysia do not have further HCV RNA performed due to high cost and thus HCV treatment is less frequently offered. HCV Core Antigen (HCV Ag) can potentially be used to diagnose active HCV infection in HD population in comparison to HCV RNA, at lower cost. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study to assess the correlation between HCV Ag and HCV RNA and to identify the prevalence of active HCV infection among HCV seropositive HD patients from dialysis centres across West Malaysia from July 2019 to May 2020. Pre-dialysis blood was taken and tested for both HCV Ag and HCV RNA tests. HCV Ag was tested with Abbott ARCHITECT HCV Ag test. Results: We recruited 112 seropositive HD patients from 17 centres with mean age of 54.04 ± 11.62 years, HD vintage of 14.1 ± 9.7 years, and male constitute 59.8% (67) of the study population. HCV Ag correlates well with HCV RNA (Spearman test coefficient 0.833, p < 0.001). The sensitivity was 90.7%, specificity 100%, positive predictive value (PPV) 100%, negative predictive value (NPV) 76.5%, and accuracy 92.9%. For HCV RNA level > 3000 IU/mL, HCV Ag had a higher sensitivity of 95.1% and greater correlation (Spearman test coefficient 0.897, p < 0.001). The prevalence of active HCV infection was 76.8% among HCV seropositive HD patients. Conclusions: Although HCV Ag is less sensitive, it shows an excellent correlation with HCV RNA and has 100% PPV. HCV Ag can be considered as an alternative diagnostic tool for chronic active HCV infection among HD cohort, who can then be considered for HCV treatment. For seropositive HD patient with negative HCV Ag, we recommend to follow-up with HCV RNA test.
2003
A preclinical evaluation of a qualitative assay for the detection of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA by transcription-mediated amplification (TMA) was conducted according to the guidelines of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Our results showed that this assay, HCV TMA, detected 95% of samples with HCV RNA concentrations of 5.3 IU/ml and 29 copies/ml. HCV TMA showed an overall specificity of 99.6% and was highly reproducible, detecting 99.3% of samples with HCV RNA concentrations of 50 copies/ml across seven different lots of reagents. Experiments with clinical samples showed that HCV TMA detected all HCV genotypes with similar efficiencies, detecting >95% of samples at 50 HCV RNA copies/ml from patients infected with HCV genotypes 1a, 2b, 3a, 4a, 5a, and 6a. In experiments with RNA transcripts, HCV TMA detected >96.6% of transcripts derived from HCV genotypes 1a, 1b, 2a, 2c, 3a, 4a, 5a, and 6a at 50 HCV RNA copies/ml. Detection of transcripts derived from HCV genotype 2b was slightly lower (88.4%) at 50 copies/ml but was 97.0% at 75 copies/ml. In addition, HCV TMA exhibited robust performance in detecting HCV RNA in samples subjected to various conditions commonly encountered in a clinical laboratory, including long-term storage, multiple freeze-thaw cycles, different collection tubes, and the presence of endogenous substances, commonly prescribed drugs, or other microorganisms and viruses. With its high sensitivity, specificity, reproducibility, and equivalent genotype reactivity, HCV TMA may provide an attractive alternative for routine qualitative HCV RNA testing in clinical laboratories.
Brazilian Journal of Microbiology, 2011
Nosocomial transmission of HCV is a concern in haemodialysis (HD) units worldwide. Diagnosis of HCV infection among dialysis patients is currently based on the detection of anti HCV antibodies by ELISA, and is confirmed by HCV RNA. The average window period between HCV infection and seroconversion with new generations of HCV antibody tests remains approximately 70 days with more prolonged period among dialysis patients. In this study we assessed the diagnostic performance of an immunoassay designed for simultaneous detection of anti HCV antibodies and core antigen in one step in comparison to qualitative RT-PCR and anti HCV antibodies detection test among Egyptian haemodialysis patients. The studied patients were 39 chronic renal failure patients on maintenance haemodialysis. The results obtained in the present study revealed HCV infection of 56.4%. Combined Ag/Ab test detected 3 out of the 4 anti-HCV negative viraemic patients who were in the window period. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the test were higher than that of anti HCV antibodies detection test (95.45%, 94.1% and 94.87% versus 81.8%, 88.23% and 84.6%) and they were raised to 100% on combining its positivity with liver enzymes elevation results. Therefore, this simple combined Ag/Ab test can be applied for early detection of HCV infection during window period among HD patients as an alternative to HCV RNA detection.