Pancasila Democracy and the Play of the Good (original) (raw)

Revolutionizing Pancasila as the ideology of Indonesians

Revolutionizing Pancasila as the ideology of Indonesians, 2022

This article examines whether Pancasila as the sole principle and ideology and state philosophy is reflected in the Indonesian society. Understanding and appreciation of the values of Pancasila ideology are often considered only as a jargon, i.e., in the verbal perspective. Its implementation is neglected due to lack of insight and knowledge about Pancasila and not knowing its basic principles. Pancasila, which consists of five precepts, includes a series of attitudes and knowledge as well as hopes from the struggle of the Indonesian people to gain independence, and is regulated in the Pancasila state. The first precept is about God the Almighty (Ketuhanan yang Maha Esa); the second precept is about just and civilized humanity (Kemanusiaan yang adil dan beradab); the third precept claims the 'unity of Indonesia' (Persatuan Indonesia); the fourth precept claims democracy led by wisdom in the representative deliberation; the fifth precept claims social justice for all Indonesian people (Keadilan sosial bagi seluruh rakyat Indonesia). Pancasila is the source of all laws in the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, which constitutes it as a sovereign and prosperous country supporting the wealth of its people, the divinity in the One and Only, freedom of religion, respect for diversity and pluralism, and building a democratic state. Social problems that often occur in every society usually start from breaking the law, dangers of the extremism doctrine, and criminal acts of corruption that can damage the grassroots of Pancasila. Therefore, to defend the country and strengthen the basic precepts of Pancasila, it is necessary to understand and deepen the practice of Pancasila in the ideology of nationalism and democracy.

Indonesia's Democracy and Constitution: Reflecting Human Rights Based on Pancasila

Journal of Law and Policy Transformation

Pancasila democracy is a democracy system applied in Indonesia to run the government based on the 1945 Constitution. The 1945 Constitution is positioned as the state constitution and is a concrete crystallization of Pancasila’s values. The constitution, which is the highest source of law in Indonesia, is very important in the Pancasila democratic system. The relationship between the Democracy, Human Rights, and Pancasila is very concord. Pancasila is the ideology of the Indonesian state, the basis of the state, and the foundation of the state philosophy. The relationship is contained in the values of Pancasila. These values highly uphold human rights which is seen from the second value of Pancasila, “fair and civilized humanity”. The relationship between democracy with human rights and Pancasila is that democracy is a system used in Indonesia to realize Pancasila’s values while still based on human rights in its implementation. Then, Pancasila must always remain the basis of the sta...

The Strong State And Pancasila: Reflecting Human Rights in the Indonesian Democracy

Indonesian Constitutional Review, 2016

The rights of every Indonesian citizens are protected by the 1945 Constitution. Does the reality matches with the normative regulations? Does democratization improves the protection of human rights especially in term of the religious freedom? We find that there is a discrepancy between the ideal written constitution and the reality. In this following essay I argue that the failure of Indonesian democratic regimes to protect human rights is the result of the lack of " stateness ". The ideal of " stateness " is referring to Fukuyama idea that is " the ability of state to plan and execute policies and to enforce law ". I will present the argument that the weakness of the administration cause by an ambiguity in the interpretation of the Indonesia ideology, Pancasila (the Five-Principles). This paper will firstly discuss the idea of strong state and its relation to the protection of human rights. Alongside the theoretical examination of the concept, I will discuss the weakness of democratic regimes in Indonesia to protect human rights. This will be followed by an examination of the core argument of the paper, argue that the principle cause of the state weakness lies on the ambiguity of the administration to interpret Pancasila.

The Future of Pancasila as a Philosophy, a View of Life, and an Ideology of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia

Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Social and Political Sciences (ICSPS 2017), 2018

Pancasila is believed to have an important history in establishing Indonesia as a nation. It is also believed to have united ethnics, languages, and religions in Indonesia successfully. Although there are different ways of implementing Pancasila from Soekarno era to Joko Widodo era, they agree that Pancasila is a philosophy, a life vision, and an ideology of Indonesia. Along the way, Pancasila has also been faced with communist ideology and Islamic political groups who want to replace Pancasila as the state ideology. The question proposed in this paper is whether Pancasila has a future in the midst of the surveys of more than 50 percent Indonesians agree on the Islamic Shariah (Islamic law). To illustrate, this study uses Signifier and Signified concept of a linguist, Ferdinand de Saussure. The Signifier is a conception of an object in which Pancasila as a symbol. Meanwhile, Signified is a conception of the function of the object or the function of Pancasila that is understood by people. Pancasila is interpreted as a guide for the life of the entire nation of Indonesia which later interpreted by other political Islam as a un-Islamic thing that is not based on Al-Quran and Hadith. The other views show that Pancasila is compatible with Islamic teachings. Although double meanings are unavoidable in an object, the meaning of Pancasila as a philosophy, a view of life, and an ideology of the nation becomes a challenge to the existence of other meanings.

Pancasila as a Paradigm of Legal Development in Indonesia

SUNETI, 2022

Pancasila as the basis of the state philosophy of the Republic of Indonesia. There are several things that need to be ancient related to Indonesian history before the process and after the formulation of Pancasila as the basis of the state. This is related to the kingdom's struggle to maintain the existence of the Indonesian nation. As for the kingdoms and periods of revival, such as the kingdom of Kutai, Sriwijaya, Majapahit, and the period of the revival of Indonesia. Pancasila is also the basis of the Indonesian nation state until now it has experienced a long journey of time, in that time span many things or events happened to accompany the journey of Pancasila, so that Pancasila was established as it is today in front of all Indonesian people. Starting from the first incident when Pancasila was initiated, it has reaped many internal conflicts from its originators until now even in the era of reform and globalization, Pancasila is still hotly discussed by many educated circles, especially politicians and students. Most of the parties who discussed the issue of Pancasila were about the initial origination of Pancasila regarding the first precepts. Indeed, from the early history of the development of the Indonesian nation, we can see that the community component is formed from two major groups, namely the religious group in this case dominated by the Islamic religious group and the second is the Nationalist group. So, after many aspects of discussing Pancasila as the basis of the State, this is made as a record of the journey of Pancasila from era to era, so that we always do not forget the history of the formation of Pancasila as the basis of the State, and can also be used to become a mediator for parties who are having different opinions about the basis of the State so that in the future we will continue to be like our motto, namely "Bhinneka Tunggal Ika".Especially this in its application in our lives, including in the environment around us.

Pancasila as the Foundation of Political Ethics in Indonesia, Case Study of the Struggle for the Chairman of a Political Party in Indonesia

Journal of Social and Political Sciences, 2021

The world of politics is becoming something interesting to discuss. Every time there's something new going on. There is no eternal enmity or eternal friend in politics, but the infinite is only essential (read: power struggle). At some point, a person could be a friend, but other times he could be the enemy. It's still fresh in all of us how frenetic the last presidential election we held yesterday. The frictions have felt very hot, so people are wary from mutual claims of victory, to each other's accusations of cheating, to the last in the Constitutional Court. However, after that, it continued on social media for months. This feud resulted in two terms that are very viral in Indonesia, namely cebong and kampret. This is an accumulation of fanaticism of both sides' supporters (“Tidak Ada Musuh Atau Teman Abadi Di Dalam Politik – IndependensI,” n.d.). This article was written to give a clearer picture of the politics in Indonesia. So there is a difference between pol...

What has enabled Pancasila to outlast political reform in Indonesia?

Pancasila is the official ideology of the Indonesian state. Comprising of 5 principles (Sila), Pancasila is an icon of Indonesian national identity, and aims to provide a doctrine of peace and unity in a diverse Indonesia. The principles are (in their essence): Belief in one God, Just and Civilised Humanism, Unity of Indonesia, Democracy, Social Justice for Indonesia . Pancasila has outlasted Sukarno’s Old Order, Suharto’s New Order and the democratisation of the Reformasi era. This essay asks the question; what characteristics does Pancasila have that has enabled it to outlast these political reforms? In consulting literature from throughout the different political eras, four areas of scholastic thought have been chosen in order to provide a considered and historically informed answer. Literature from the New Order period provides a cultural insight into Pancasila’s roots in Javanese tradition and how it enabled abuse by Suharto. The sustained symbolic function of Pancasila is examined through a modern representation by a short film published online. Pancasila’s linguistic adaptability is analysed through its shifted meaning in the lexicon. Finally, Pancasila’s regional context is examined through modern political theory on ideology in Southeast Asia.

The Manifestation of Indonesian Democracy; Between Pancasila State of Law and Islamic Nomocracy

Jurnal Hukum Novelty

The state of Pancasila law is a tool for people who have the power to regulate human relations in society and regulate the symptoms of power in society. As a country with the largest Muslim population in the world, Indonesia does not make Islam its legal basis. The Islamic Nomocracy and its values are embedded in the state of Pancasila law, as well as manifestation of democracy itself. Through these hyphoteses, the writer tries to find a common flateform between Pancasila and the Islamic Nomocracy in the formation of Indonesian democracy. This classic problem requires special attention, because the debate always triggers reactions and actions. Islam as a religion with complex system of living is believed to be a powerful mechanism in dealing with various life problems encountered. The Shari'ah consists of a combination of pre-Islamic customs and habits with principles and laws originated from the Qur'an and authentic prophetic tradition. Islamic scholars try to form Islamic teachings as ethical and national policies. Even so, the principle of the Pancasila state was accepted as final, at least there were Islamic nomocracy values embedded in the Pancasila while at the same time they contributed to build Indonesia's democracy as a modern country. The theological values in the Pancasila and islamic nomocracy should not be a mere formal rule, but should address the substance of democracy in Indonesia. The rule of law must be supported by a democratic system because there is a clear correlation between the rule of law which relies on the constitution, and the sovereignty of the people which is carried out through a democratic system. In a democratic system, people's participation is the essence of this system. However, democracy without legal regulation will lose form and direction, while law without democracy will lose meaning.

Implementation of Pancasila Democratic Values in General Elections and Freedom of Expression in Indonesia

JUPIIS: JURNAL PENDIDIKAN ILMU-ILMU SOSIAL

Pancasila democracy is a democracy that leads to the identity of the Indonesian nation. The journey of democracy in Indonesia still needs to go through a long process because it has not been fully implemented as it should. The implementation of democratic values in general elections and freedom of expression is one of the efforts that can be done to uphold democracy in the life of the state in the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia. This study aims to find out how important the implementation of the Pancasila values of Pancasila is in an effort to uphold democracy, especially in General Elections and Freedom of Opinion. The research method used is a qualitative method. This research is a literature study where all information and facts are sought from various sources such as books, articles, journals, and so on. Elections are one of the basic principles of implementing a democratic state which is contained in the fourth principle of Pancasila. Besides that, in a democracy ev...