Musa Tüzüner, "Insights of Intelligence Insiders on (Non-) Sharing Intelligence Behaviors," All Azimuth 3, No.2 (2014): 51-66. (original) (raw)
Related papers
An Examination of the Strategies of Intelligence Sharing Implemented in the Aftermath of 9:11 final
Post 9/11there have been significant improvements in international intelligence sharing and liaison and the complexities of this sharing holds interest for studies within the intelligence sphere. It appears that discussion surrounding international intelligence co-operation and information sharing lacks an awareness of how collaboration can be improved between international partners. This literature review analyses the improvements made in strategic-level international intelligence co-operation and liaison since 9/11, with a particular focus with regard to the war on terrorism. The study examines both historical and contemporary research from the field of international intelligence and security. This qualitative research was used to investigate the current state of international intelligence sharing in the light of three sub questions: How do states that have conflicting interests engage in intelligence sharing? How can suspending intelligence sharing operate as a tool for other purposes? – e.g. suspension of military aid to Pakistan, and Brexit negotiations. How can the US benefit from co-operation with international intelligence agencies?
The study of the democratisation of intelligence in former authoritarian regimes and, more broadly, the relationship between intelligence and democracy, has hitherto concentrated on state intelligence services. The article challenges the utility of this state-centric model and considers the significance of corporate and para-state sectors of intelligence including their multiple interactions with states. ‘Securitism’ is developed as a model of these interactions which can be used in the analysis of contemporary intelligence governance and the profound challenges posed to the possibility of democratic control and oversight.
Intelligence Reform: The Logic of Information Sharing
Intelligence and National Security, 2007
A cornerstone of US intelligence reform is ‘information sharing’ as a means of adapting to contemporary security challenges. It was a central recommendation of the 9/11 Commission, reflected in the wide-ranging ‘Information Sharing Environment’ mandated by the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004. Yet the underlying logic of information sharing for intelligence reform has received little attention. Drawing on information and communications theory, this paper critiques the logic by highlighting problems of sense-making and interpretation overlooked amid the scholarly enthusiasm for an intelligence ‘culture of sharing’. With their impersonal, technical, and highly bureaucratic approach, today's reforms may favor the flow of information and its sheer volume at the expense of the context and analytic tradecraft that render it meaningful, actionable intelligence. For effective information sharing, the paper suggests reformers pay more attention to the socio-technical environment of analysis when interpreting ambiguous, uncertain information.
Major Issues and Dilemmas in Intelligence Gathering and Sharing as a Counterterrorism Strategy
Strategic Journal of Business & Change Management
The central objective of this study was to identify major issues and dilemmas in intelligence gathering and sharing as a counterterrorism strategy. The research covered diverse categories of informants from various institutions and agencies cross cut by intelligence gathering and sharing in Kenya. These included: security officers from the national police service, members of civil society organizations working in areas of security and human rights, academicians and members of the public. Government officers, members of community policing department and former police reservists were also included. Exploratory research design was applied. Based on the design, a historical interrogation approach was applied to interrogate various facets of IG & S and terrorism in Kenya whereby they were chronologically documented, and the changes that have occurred over time analyzed. Data analysis was done through mixed analysis method. The study found out that diverse security reforms that have been implemented in the country since independence which have helped to improve IG & S. Major improvements were highlighted to have been streamlined in technology used, training and the information shared. Among the different forms of intelligence, human intelligence and signals intelligence were found to have played the greatest role in containing TT. The study concluded that the question of intelligence being effective or ineffective in curbing transnational terrorism is dependent on the reaction of all security agencies who receive it. The study recommended that the ability of terrorists to morph should be met with equal efforts by security forces changing their strategies in gathering and sharing information on terrorism from members of the public. All agencies should continuously go through retooling and capacity building on early warnings. Furthermore, there is need for interagency cooperation in sharing intelligence. Both domestic and foreign agencies involved in intelligence sharing should work together to boost their confidence with each other to enhance their readiness and commitment to share security intelligence.
From Oversight to Undersight: the Internationalization of Intelligence
Security and Human Rights, 2014
Due to the globalization and nodalisation of intelligence - resulting in hybrid intelligence assemblages - well-known problems related to overseeing intelligence are deteriorating. Not only does the international cooperation between intelligence services contribute to this problem, but especially the internationalization of intelligence collection meaning that as a consequence of technological and market transformations intelligence collection has become footloose and can be conducted remotely. In that way it leaves any idea of national sovereignty or the national protection of civil rights increasingly obsolete. Instead of oversight by institutions the real counter-power in post-democratic constellations seems to be practised by whistleblowers and investigative journalists. Sousveillance or undersight therefore seems to be the most important current oversight mechanism.
The proximity of relations between intelligence officers and policymakers and the balance between the aspirations of the intelligence officers to influence the decision-making process and their primary professional duty to gather accurate intelligence is an ongoing argument within the intelligence discourse. Other discussions focus on whether the primary professional duty of the intelligence officer is merely to create intelligence or also to actively shape policy, and whether strategic intelligence is a product of research groups in the intelligence community or of a dialogue between intelligence and the policymaker, ultimately leading to new strategic knowledge that facilitates the formation of a national policy. We argue that the development of knowledge for shaping policy on the strategic level should be done in a cooperative manner—in a meeting between intelligence officers and decision makers. The lack of suitable conditions in the space between intelligence and policymakers, however, prevents this in many cases. The limited ability of the intelligence community and the political echelon to act cooperatively and develop a facilitating framework of mechanisms and learning processes should therefore be recognized, in addition to the intelligence community's limitations and the characteristics of the strategic environs. This article reviews the main approaches concerning the interface between policymakers and intelligence—the traditional approaches versus what we call the “cooperative approach.” It proposes an approach that regards intelligence on a national level as a joint project of intelligence officers and policymakers. At the same time, the article analyzes the tension and obstacles in implementing this approach and proposes possible ways of overcoming them.
Public and private intelligence: Historical and contemporary perspectives
Salus Journal, 2013
Intelligence is often regarded as information that is special or different, which must be safely kept. When sought, collected or used by the private sector, as opposed to public agencies, concerns are raised on the purpose and propriety of such an activity. However, in an historical context, intelligence collection or sharing between public and private interests for the purpose of national security was not unusual, particularly during the Cold War. Case studies from this era indicate that overlapping concerns were economic success combined with political strategy. Glimpses of these shared interests between the state and business can also be identified in the immediate post-Cold War era, and the aftermath of terrorist attacks in 2001. Perhaps the greatest contemporary change is not that “private” and “public “intelligence is shared between business and state, but the extent of such an enterprise. Further issues related to this change are: state dominance in the public-private relatio...
RIEAS: Research Paper, 2006
This paper examines the challenges that the Intelligence Community is facing in the post Cold War era. The argument for an intelligence reform has always been popular, but gained greater momentum after 9/11. In order to define the argument for a Revolution in Intelligence Affairs, the paper examines several aspects that relate to intelligence reform, like the impact of information technology on the culture of intelligence, the open source solution, the problems regarding information overload and the politicization of the intelligence product. The purpose is to identify the dilemmas that reformers face and conclude on whether a new paradigm in intelligence affairs is about to emerge.