Economic Data Collection for Marine Recreational Angling: the U.S. Approach (original) (raw)

Related papers

The Economic Importance of Marine Angler Expenditures in the United States; Selected Results

2002

In 1998, the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) launched a series of marine recreational angler expenditure survey in the Northeast (NE) management region (Maine, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Delaware, Maryland, and Virginia). This series was extended to the Southeast (SE) management region (North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Florida, Alabama, Mississippi, and Louisiana) in 1999 and the Pacific (PAC) management region (California, Oregon, and Washington) in 2000. These surveys were designed to collect the data needed to estimate average and total angler expenditures, by state and resident status, on trip expenses and durable goods for use in economic impact assessment. These estimates are currently being used to develop economic impacts, by state and by the United States (US) as a whole, using IMPLAN, a ready-made input-output model. This report briefly summarizes the methodologies used to estimate expenditures and econom...

Exploring Survey Methodologies for Collecting Recreational Angler Expenditure Data

2008

Beginning in 1998 on the East Coast of the United States (US) and ending on the West Coast of the US in 2000, the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) conducted a series of surveys to gauge marine recreational angler expenditures by region. These surveys were conducted using the Marine Recreational Fisheries Statistical Survey (MRFSS) to gather a sample frame for a telephone follow-up survey focusing on trip and annual expenditures. Since the MRFSS was not conducted in Alaska, Hawaii, or Texas during this timeframe, those states were not included in the analysis. NMFS repeated this effort in 2006, but altered the methodology for a number of reasons. For the 2006 effort, the MRFSS survey was used to collect trip expenditures in the field and collect a sample frame for a follow-up mail survey of annual expenditures on the East and Gulf Coasts. For the California, Oregon, Washington, Alaska, Hawaii, and Texas, states not participating in the MRFSS in 2006, a license frame mail survey was conducted collecting both trip and annual expenditure information. Additionally, recreational Highly Migratory Species permit holders were also surveyed, a telephone survey of non-respondents was conducted, and a side-byside survey mode comparison was conducted. Selected expenditure and economic impact estimates will be presented based on completion of impact modeling currently underway. Also, a comparison of expenditures across respondents and non-respondents, across mail and telephone modes, and between HMS permit holders and general anglers will be presented.

The economic contribution of marine angler expenditures in the United States, 2011

2013

Marine recreational fishing is a popular outdoor leisure activity nationwide when measured by number of participants. The National Marine Fisheries Service estimates that 24.7 million saltwater anglers fished 127.2 million days in the coastal states of the U.S. in 2006. In this report, we quantify the level of fishing expenditures for these anglers within each coastal state and the U.S. as a whole. At the U.S. level, we estimate that saltwater anglers spent an estimated 5.8billionontrip−basedexpenditures(e.g.,ice,bait,andfuel)andanother5.8 billion on trip-based expenditures (e.g., ice, bait, and fuel) and another 5.8billionontrip−basedexpenditures(e.g.,ice,bait,andfuel)andanother25.6 billion on fishing equipment and durable goods (e.g., fishing rods, fishing tackle, and boats) in 2006. In the second exercise carried out for this study we conduct a regional input-output assessment to examine how those expenditures circulated through each state's economy as well as the economy of the entire U.S. We show that as angler expenditures filtered through the U.

The Michigan Recreational Angling Demand Model

2001

Recreational demand models based on the travel cost method are widely used to establish the economic use-value of water based recreation. Modern multiple-site variants of the travel cost method allow the spatial patterns of recreation demand to be linked to quality characteristics of recreation sites. This linkage can be used to estimate values of changes in site characteristics such as water quality. The most widely used type of multiple-site travel cost model is the random utility model which was popularized as a recreation demand model by the work of Bockstael, Hanemann, and Strand, and Bockstael, Hanemann, and Kling. This paper reports on a large-scale spatial model of the demand for recreational angling in Michigan. The model is a repeated random utility model (RUM) of recreational fishing in Michigan by resident anglers. The model was developed at Michigan State University (MSU) under a grant from Michigan's Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) and Department of Environmental Quality. The material in this paper summarizes, and is drawn from, the project report of Hoehn, Tomasi, Lupi, and Chen. The model differs from others in the literature in its breadth and scale. The geographic scope of the model is the entire state of Michigan, and the model encompasses the broad range of fishing activities available in a state with abundant water and fishery resources. Because descriptions of the theory of the RUM and the statistical models used here are readily available in the literature (McFadden, 1981; Ben-Akiva and Lerman; Morey), the exact specification of the site choice probabilities and the likelihood function are relegated to the Appendix. Instead, our focus is on describing the model structure, presenting estimated parameters, and providing some illustrative results.

Economic Evaluation of Recreational Fishery Policies

Recreational Fisheries, 2002

Recreational fi sheries around the world provide humans with important economic benefi ts because people derive well-being from participating in the act of fi shing. Many of these benefi ts are diffi cult to value, however, because they are nonmarket in nature and depend on 'free' ecological services. Other sectors of society may also depend on these public goods. It is diffi cult to exclude people from using public goods and there is, therefore, a tendency for them to be under-produced by the private sector. Thus, there is often a need for government policy intervention to ensure the adequate production of public ecological services and resolve confl icts over their use. Policies that affect recreational fi sheries have costs and benefi ts, both for anglers and people in other sectors of society, that must be accounted for if social well-being is to be maximised. Economics can be used to quantify the costs and benefi ts of various policy options available to society, and make recommendations that improve overall economic effi ciency. Overall well-being (welfare) consists of the sum of 'surpluses' accruing to producers and consumers. In this chapter, we outline the principles of economic cost-benefi t analysis of market and nonmarket values for recreational fi sheries using examples from various jurisdictions. We also consider how economic analysis can be used to account for the transaction costs of fi sheries management -costs often borne by society as a whole -for different forms of governance.

A Triple Hurdle Expenditure Analysis of U.S. Saltwater Recreational Fishing

Journal of Economics and Business, 2019

This paper presents a comprehensive review of the econometric approaches for the analysis of tourism expenditure at individual level. The attempt to consider only regression models is novel in literature. The paper resumes 86 papers and 354 estimates of econometric models from data at individual level, ranging from 1977 to the early 2012. Discussion focuses on models used, dependent variables, explanatory variables by category and their effect on expenditure. The most frequently used explanatory variables were income, socio-demographic and trip-related, and were tested mainly through classical regression techniques (OLS, quantile, Tobit and two-step, logistic). Future research directions should concern the exploration of new evidence through novel methodological techniques, a more extensive use of psychographic variables and a stronger relation to economic theory.

Economic Valuation of Recreational Fishery Policies

2002

Recreational fi sheries around the world provide humans with important economic benefi ts because people derive well-being from participating in the act of fi shing. Many of these benefi ts are diffi cult to value, however, because they are nonmarket in nature and depend on 'free' ecological services. Other sectors of society may also depend on these public goods. It is diffi cult to exclude people from using public goods and there is, therefore, a tendency for them to be under-produced by the private sector. Thus, there is often a need for government policy intervention to ensure the adequate production of public ecological services and resolve confl icts over their use. Policies that affect recreational fi sheries have costs and benefi ts, both for anglers and people in other sectors of society, that must be accounted for if social well-being is to be maximised. Economics can be used to quantify the costs and benefi ts of various policy options available to society, and make recommendations that improve overall economic effi ciency. Overall well-being (welfare) consists of the sum of 'surpluses' accruing to producers and consumers. In this chapter, we outline the principles of economic cost-benefi t analysis of market and nonmarket values for recreational fi sheries using examples from various jurisdictions. We also consider how economic analysis can be used to account for the transaction costs of fi sheries management -costs often borne by society as a whole -for different forms of governance.

The Value of Recreational Inshore Marine Fishing

2011

The relative values of New Zealand commercial and recreational marine fishing are unknown. Value transfer is applied to assess the likely value of inshore marine recreational fishing. The few relevant studies available report widely differing estimates of value. However, there is sufficient evidence to indicate that the value of recreational fishing is of the same order of magnitude as commercial fishing.

Estimating Demand for Recreational Fishing in Alabama Using Travel Cost Model

2009

Individuals and households reveal their willingness to pay to enjoy environmental and natural resource services by engaging in outdoor recreation activities. The state of Alabama and the Black-Belt region possess significant recreational fishing resources whose qualities could be improved through public and private management innovations. To measure the value of such interventions, a baseline estimate of recreational fishing demand and potential for increasing the demand by on-site improvements needs to established. Using direct mail survey, count data obtained on individual angler characteristics, expenditures on fishing equipment, and destinations and expenditures on time and travel for each trip taken. In addition, the kinds and quantities of fish that anglers sought on each trip were obtained. This paper employs a full a full economic analysis based on recreation demand models—a.k.a. Travel Cost models (TCM). The travel costs’ Negative Binomial regression reveals that the averag...