Forensic Assessment of Sexual Interest: A Review (original) (raw)

Validity of Physiological Measures of Pedophilic Sexual Arousal in a Sexual Offender Population: A Critique of Hall, Proctor, and Nelson

Vernon Quinsey

J Consult Clin Psychol, 1990

View PDFchevron_right

Discriminative and predictive validity of the penile plethysmograph in adolescent sex offenders

Robert Clift

Sexual abuse : a journal of research and treatment, 2009

View PDFchevron_right

Standardization of Penile Plethysmography Testing in Assessment of Problematic Sexual Interests

Paul Fedoroff

The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 2015

View PDFchevron_right

Advances in the Assessment of Sexual Deviance

gina ambroziak

Current psychiatry reports, 2018

View PDFchevron_right

Sexual preference assessment of sexual aggressors: Predictors of penile response magnitude

A. McKibben

Archives of Sexual Behavior, 1993

View PDFchevron_right

Assessment of problematic sexual interests with the penile plethysmograph: an overview of assessment laboratories

Lisa Murphy

Current psychiatry reports, 2015

View PDFchevron_right

Validity of physiological measures of pedophilic sexual arousal in a sexual offender population

Gordon Nagayama Hall

Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1988

View PDFchevron_right

The Penile Plethysmograph, Abel Assessment for Sexual Interest and MSI-II: Are They Speaking the Same Language?

Dean Tong

View PDFchevron_right

Pedophilia: An Evaluation of Diagnostic and Risk Prediction Methods

Jan Looman

Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 2011

View PDFchevron_right

Clinical characteristics associated with paedophilia and child sex offending -Differentiating sexual preference from offence status

zxzdfsdfsdfs dfsfdffd

View PDFchevron_right

Assessment of Juvenile Sexual Offenders: Reliability and Validity of the Abel Assessment for Interest in Paraphilias

Lane Fischer

Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 1999

View PDFchevron_right

Phallometric Comparison of Pedophilic Interest in Nonadmitting Sexual Offenders Against Stepdaughters, Biological Daughters, Other Biologically Related Girls, and Unrelated Girls

James Cantor

Sexual Abuse, 2006

View PDFchevron_right

The Relation Between Peak Response Magnitudes and Agreement in Diagnoses Obtained From Two Different Phallometric Tests for Pedophilia

Amy Lykins, Ray Blanchard

Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 2010

View PDFchevron_right

The psychometric properties of the penile tumescence assessment of child molesters

William O'Donohue

Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 1992

View PDFchevron_right

DSM-5 proposed diagnostic criteria for sexual paraphilias: Tensions between diagnostic validity and forensic utility

jerome C wakefield

International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 2011

View PDFchevron_right

Penile circumference, skin conductance, and ranking responses of child molesters and “Normals” to sexual and nonsexual visual stimuli

Cary Steinman, Vernon Quinsey

Behavior Therapy, 1975

View PDFchevron_right

Evidential Basis for the Assessment and Treatment of Sex Offenders

John Bradford

Brief Treatment and Crisis Intervention, 2008

View PDFchevron_right

Report from the Committee on Sex Offenders: the Abel Assessment for Sexual Interest--a brief description

Graham Glancy

PubMed, 1998

View PDFchevron_right

Indirect and Neuropsychological Indicators of Pedophilia

Marc Graf

Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 2020

View PDFchevron_right

Deficient erotic gender differentiation in pedophilia: A follow-up

michael kuban

Archives of Sexual Behavior, 1993

View PDFchevron_right

Predictors of Sexual

R. Karl Hanson

2001

View PDFchevron_right

Relationship between MMPI and penile plethysmograph in accused child molesters

Lester Wright

Journal of Sex Research, 1994

View PDFchevron_right

Sexual offenders against male children: Sexual preferences

Howard Barbaree

Behaviour Research and Therapy, 1988

View PDFchevron_right

International overview of phallometric testing for sexual offending behaviour and sexual risk

Andrew Bickle

2021

View PDFchevron_right

Direct and Indirect Measures of Sexual Maturity Preferences Differentiate Subtypes of Child Sexual Abusers

Alexander F Schmidt, Kris Vanhoeck, Rainer Banse

Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 26, 107-128.

View PDFchevron_right

Preventing Faking in Phallometric Assessments of Sexual Preference

Vernon Quinsey

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1988

View PDFchevron_right

Assessment of Pedophilia Using Hemodynamic Brain Response to Sexual Stimuli

Maximilian Mehdorn

Archives of General Psychiatry, 2012

View PDFchevron_right

Phallometric assessments designed to detect arousal to children: The responses of rapists and child molesters

Jan Looman

Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and …, 2001

View PDFchevron_right

The Utility of the Diagnosis of Pedophilia: A Comparison of Various Classification Procedures

John Bradford

Archives of Sexual Behavior, 2007

View PDFchevron_right

Is Pedophilic Sexual Preference Continuous? A Taxometric Analysis based on Direct and Indirect Measures

Alexander F Schmidt, Rainer Banse

Psychological Assessment, 2013

View PDFchevron_right