Forensic Assessment of Sexual Interest: A Review (original) (raw)
Validity of Physiological Measures of Pedophilic Sexual Arousal in a Sexual Offender Population: A Critique of Hall, Proctor, and Nelson
Vernon Quinsey
J Consult Clin Psychol, 1990
View PDFchevron_right
Discriminative and predictive validity of the penile plethysmograph in adolescent sex offenders
Robert Clift
Sexual abuse : a journal of research and treatment, 2009
View PDFchevron_right
Standardization of Penile Plethysmography Testing in Assessment of Problematic Sexual Interests
Paul Fedoroff
The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 2015
View PDFchevron_right
Advances in the Assessment of Sexual Deviance
gina ambroziak
Current psychiatry reports, 2018
View PDFchevron_right
Sexual preference assessment of sexual aggressors: Predictors of penile response magnitude
A. McKibben
Archives of Sexual Behavior, 1993
View PDFchevron_right
Assessment of problematic sexual interests with the penile plethysmograph: an overview of assessment laboratories
Lisa Murphy
Current psychiatry reports, 2015
View PDFchevron_right
Validity of physiological measures of pedophilic sexual arousal in a sexual offender population
Gordon Nagayama Hall
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1988
View PDFchevron_right
The Penile Plethysmograph, Abel Assessment for Sexual Interest and MSI-II: Are They Speaking the Same Language?
Dean Tong
View PDFchevron_right
Pedophilia: An Evaluation of Diagnostic and Risk Prediction Methods
Jan Looman
Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 2011
View PDFchevron_right
Clinical characteristics associated with paedophilia and child sex offending -Differentiating sexual preference from offence status
zxzdfsdfsdfs dfsfdffd
View PDFchevron_right
Assessment of Juvenile Sexual Offenders: Reliability and Validity of the Abel Assessment for Interest in Paraphilias
Lane Fischer
Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 1999
View PDFchevron_right
Phallometric Comparison of Pedophilic Interest in Nonadmitting Sexual Offenders Against Stepdaughters, Biological Daughters, Other Biologically Related Girls, and Unrelated Girls
James Cantor
Sexual Abuse, 2006
View PDFchevron_right
The Relation Between Peak Response Magnitudes and Agreement in Diagnoses Obtained From Two Different Phallometric Tests for Pedophilia
Amy Lykins, Ray Blanchard
Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 2010
View PDFchevron_right
The psychometric properties of the penile tumescence assessment of child molesters
William O'Donohue
Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 1992
View PDFchevron_right
DSM-5 proposed diagnostic criteria for sexual paraphilias: Tensions between diagnostic validity and forensic utility
jerome C wakefield
International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 2011
View PDFchevron_right
Penile circumference, skin conductance, and ranking responses of child molesters and “Normals” to sexual and nonsexual visual stimuli
Cary Steinman, Vernon Quinsey
Behavior Therapy, 1975
View PDFchevron_right
Evidential Basis for the Assessment and Treatment of Sex Offenders
John Bradford
Brief Treatment and Crisis Intervention, 2008
View PDFchevron_right
Report from the Committee on Sex Offenders: the Abel Assessment for Sexual Interest--a brief description
Graham Glancy
PubMed, 1998
View PDFchevron_right
Indirect and Neuropsychological Indicators of Pedophilia
Marc Graf
Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 2020
View PDFchevron_right
Deficient erotic gender differentiation in pedophilia: A follow-up
michael kuban
Archives of Sexual Behavior, 1993
View PDFchevron_right
Predictors of Sexual
R. Karl Hanson
2001
View PDFchevron_right
Relationship between MMPI and penile plethysmograph in accused child molesters
Lester Wright
Journal of Sex Research, 1994
View PDFchevron_right
Sexual offenders against male children: Sexual preferences
Howard Barbaree
Behaviour Research and Therapy, 1988
View PDFchevron_right
International overview of phallometric testing for sexual offending behaviour and sexual risk
Andrew Bickle
2021
View PDFchevron_right
Direct and Indirect Measures of Sexual Maturity Preferences Differentiate Subtypes of Child Sexual Abusers
Alexander F Schmidt, Kris Vanhoeck, Rainer Banse
Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 26, 107-128.
View PDFchevron_right
Preventing Faking in Phallometric Assessments of Sexual Preference
Vernon Quinsey
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1988
View PDFchevron_right
Assessment of Pedophilia Using Hemodynamic Brain Response to Sexual Stimuli
Maximilian Mehdorn
Archives of General Psychiatry, 2012
View PDFchevron_right
Phallometric assessments designed to detect arousal to children: The responses of rapists and child molesters
Jan Looman
Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and …, 2001
View PDFchevron_right
The Utility of the Diagnosis of Pedophilia: A Comparison of Various Classification Procedures
John Bradford
Archives of Sexual Behavior, 2007
View PDFchevron_right
Is Pedophilic Sexual Preference Continuous? A Taxometric Analysis based on Direct and Indirect Measures
Alexander F Schmidt, Rainer Banse
Psychological Assessment, 2013
View PDFchevron_right