An analysis of AAIR country strategy 2012-2017 and participatory baseline survey (original) (raw)

Assessment of National Level Data (1995 – 2005)

2007

THE GHANA STRATEGY SUPPORT PROGRAM (GSSP) BACKGROUND PAPERS ABOUT GSSP GSSP is a research, communication, and capacity-strengthening program to build the capabilities of researchers, administrators, policymakers, and members of civil society in Ghana to develop and implement agricultural and rural development strategies. With core funding from the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID)/Ghana and a mandate to develop a multi-donor-funded Program, IFPRI launched GSSP as a partnership between Ghana and its development partners. IFPRI is working with these stakeholders to generate information, improve dialogue, and sharpen decisionmaking processes essential for effective formulation and implementation of development strategies. GSSP informs stakeholders on the role of agriculture and rural development in the broader economic and policy context in line with the emphasis placed on agriculture in Ghana's Growth and Poverty Reduction Strategy. GSSP supports the development and implementation of a system to monitor and evaluate progress toward achieving Ghana's growth and poverty reduction targets and the Millennium Development Goals. ABOUT THESE BACKGROUND PAPERS IFPRI's Ghana Strategy Support Program (GSSP) Background Papers contain preliminary material and research results from IFPRI and/or its partners in Ghana. The papers have not been subject to a formal peer review. They are circulated in order to stimulate discussion and critical comment. The opinions are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of their home institutions or supporting organizations.

Evaluation Report EV697 Country Programme Evaluation: Ethiopia Country Programme Evaluation Ethiopia

2009

DFID has a rolling programme of Country Programme Evaluations (CPEs) with 5 or 6 evaluations of countries or regions per year.A synthesis report pulling together findings from five recent CPEs is also produced annually. CPEs are challenging evaluations attempting to provide an overview of the entire DFID programme over a five­year time frame and evaluate whether DFID made appropriate strategic choices in the given context and delivered effectively. CPEs are ideally undertaken in the year prior to development of a new Country Assistance Plan, as they are designed to meet DFID's needs for lessons that can inform future strategy and programming, as well as accountability for funds spent at country level. CPEs are intended for a wide audience including DFID's country office staff and partners, senior DFID managers in the relevant regional divisions and members of the public/ other stakeholders. Each CPE is managed by DFID's Evaluation Department and carried out by 4­6 indepe...

Integrating Quantitative And Qualitative Research For Country Case Studies Of Development

This paper reviews the use of combinations of quantitative and qualitative approaches (Q-squared) for country level studies with particular reference to the work of the Global Development Network (GDN). It discusses the main features of these approaches and examines their strengths and weaknesses. It argues that Q-squared approaches offer substantial potential benefits in terms of data quality, depth of understanding and policy analysis. However, these benefits need to be weighed up against the additional direct and indirect costs that will be incurred.

Final Performance Evaluation Report of the Regional Strategic Analysis and Knowledge Support System (ReSAKSS)

The Regional Strategic Analysis and Knowledge Support System (ReSAKSS) supports the implementation of the African Union (AU) Comprehensive African Agriculture Programme (CAADP) at the continental, regional, and country levels throughout Africa. ReSAKSS was created to provide technical policy and data analysis assistance and support to the AUC, regional economic communities (RECs), and country-level government entities responsible for the agricultural sector, notably ministries of agriculture. Thus far, ReSAKSS has been implemented in three phases: an inception phase (2006–2009); a transitional phase (2010); and a consolidation phase (2010–2015). This evaluation of ReSAKSS was commissioned by the USAID Bureau for Food Security (BFS) to examine ReSAKSS activities from October 2010 through 2014. The evaluation findings provide insights into assistance needed to support CAADP achievement of the goals AU June 2014 Malabo Declaration, which includes ending hunger and halving poverty by 2025. This report identifies how ReSAKSS facilitating research and analysis to support and encourage evidence- and outcome-based agricultural policy planning done at the country and regional levels, a key tenet of CAADP. This evaluation centers on how stakeholders experience ReSAKSS work at the country level. Much like looking at an open umbrella from the handle up, the perspective is of how stakeholders experience ReSAKSS work at the country, regional and continental levels from their own understanding and involvement. The evaluation questions each bring this experience into focus regarding the use of information that ReSAKSS produces, how this information and interaction with ReSAKSS contribute to policy planning, and how this information is shared. This country stakeholder perspective is important as CAADP is grounded in country-led and country-owned processes and analysis.

From analysis to action – Multidimensional Country Reviews

OECD Insights, 2016

Multidimensional Country Reviews (MDCRs) support developing This document and any map included herein are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. You can copy, download or print OECD content for your own use, and you can include excerpts from OECD publications, databases and multimedia products in your own documents, presentations, blogs, websites and teaching materials, provided that suitable acknowledgment of

SWOT-AHS Yöntemi ile Korunan Alanlarda Ekoturizm Stratejilerinin Belirlenmesi: Aksaray- Ihlara Özel Çevre Koruma Bölgesi (ÖÇKB) Örneği

Journal of Geography, 2020

The need to overcome the problems created by human impact in protected areas has today necessitated the creation of various ways of sustainable development. The sustainability paradigm has become an important framework in tourism as in many other fields. Ecotourism is seen as a key element in the sustainability of tourism. It is defined as a tourism approach that protects and develops natural and cultural values, and at the same time enables the participation and development of local people. The aim of this study was to develop suitable ecotourism strategies for Aksaray's Ihlara Valley which is a Special Environmental Protection Zone (SEPZ). For this purpose, SWOT-AHP technique, which is a hybrid method, was used. In this study, after conducting the SWOT analysis which clarified the strengths-weaknesses and opportunity-threats of the Ihlara Valley, the weightings of SWOT groups and factors were determined by Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). Developed strategies for environmental, socio-cultural and economic sustainability are: "Determination of carrying capacity with effective ecotourism planning", "the creation of a new image of the region within the scope of international protection status", "elimination of tourism infrastructure-superstructure deficiencies", "diversification of tourist activities", "organizing training programs and courses of ecotourism for stakeholders" and "ensuring economic prosperity through the participation of local people in tourism". These strategies are thought to be beneficial for stakeholders in developing protection-use practices in a possible ecotourism planning process in Ihlara SEPZ.

Policy Evaluation of Cianjur Regional Middle Term Development Plan, 2011-2016

Pasundan Social Science Development

This research was initiated by indicating that the policy evaluation of the Regional Development Plan of Cianjur (RPJMD) 2011-2016 has not been optimal yet, primarily related to South Cianjur-based road infrastructure development. The strengthening of the phenomenon has implications on the low purchasing power of society and the low level of public welfare, especially in South Cianjur. Therefore, the researcher focuses on evaluating the Medium-Term Development Plan (RPJMD) of Cianjur regency for 2011-2016 and the Strategy of RPJMD Cianjur policy evaluation is expected to increase people's purchasing power in Cianjur regency. The purpose of the study, among others; first, describe and analyze the evaluation of the Cianjur District Medium-Term Development Plan (RPJMD) policy for 2011-2016, and secondly, to analyze and find the concept of RPJMD policy evaluation strategy that can be done to develop the development of tourism-based road infrastructure, especially in South Cianjur. W...

Analisis Strategi Manajemen Pancasila Untuk Globalisasi

Jurnal Pengembangan Wiraswasta

Pancasila sebagai dasar negara Republik Indonesia mempunyai butir-butir yang terkandung di dalamnya dan itu adalah Strategi Manajemen yang akan semakin terkenal menjadi Strategi Manajemen Pancasila untuk menjalankan kehidupan bagi bangsa Indonesia. Kehidupan itu mencakup semua sektor baik ekonomi, politik, sosial dan budaya. Banyak yang kurang memahami peranan dan kegunaan Strategi Manajemen Pancasila terutama dalam kancah globalisasi. Banyak yang beranggapan bahwa Indonesia terkena dampak globalisasi, Indonesia adalah obyek globalisasi. Padahal sejatinya globalisasi itu melibatkan semua warga dunia baik sebagi obyek maupun sebagai subyek. Indonesia adalah salah satu subyek atau pemain globalisasi, Indonesia adalah salah satu pemain kompetisi internasional. Indonesia dengan Strategi Manajemen Pancasila harus berperan aktif sebagai subyek dalam kancah globalisasi karena nenek moyang bangsa Indonesia telah melanglang buana ke manca negara sebagai pemain globalisasi di mulai dari perdagangan dan tentu sisi politik, sosial dan budaya pasti ikut dalam perdagangan itu. Artikel ini membahas tentang analisis Strategi Manajemen Pancasila terhadap globalisasi dengan menggunakan metode kualitatif deskriptif dengan menggabungkan hasil wawancara dan kajian pustaka. Beberapa penelitian menyatakan bahwa Indonesia sebagai obyek terkena dampak globalisasi dan hampir belum ada penelitian yang menyatakan Indonesia sebagai subyek telah berhasil mewarnai globalisasi. Hasil wawancara menemukan Strategi Pancasila berhasil membawa bangsa Indonesia berperan aktif dalam globalisasi sementara informan yang lain menyatakan bahwa masuh diperlukan pendidikan dan pemahaman yang lebih untuk menjalankan Strategi Pancasila dalam berperan aktif di era globalisasi.