Experience of cardioverter-defibrillators inserted without thoracotomy: evaluation of transvenously inserted intracardiac leads alone or with a subcutaneous axillary patch (original ) (raw )Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Implanted by Nonthoracotomy Approach: Initial Clinical Experience with the Redesigned Transvenous Lead System
James Maloney
Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1991
View PDFchevron_right
Results and Realistic Expectations with Transvenous Lead Systems
Hans Scheld
Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1992
View PDFchevron_right
Compatibility of a nonthoracotomy lead system with a biphasic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
James Porterfield , Richard Luceri
The American Journal of Cardiology, 1996
View PDFchevron_right
Nonthoracotomy lead system for implantable defibrillator
john kall
The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1993
View PDFchevron_right
Total Pectoral Implantation: A New Technique for Implantation of Transvenous Defibrillator Lead Systems and Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator
Anthony Gomes
Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1993
View PDFchevron_right
Improved 'cut-down' technique for transvenous pacemaker lead implantation
Theofilos M Kolettis
Europace, 2010
View PDFchevron_right
Risk of failure of transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads
Enno van der Velde
Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology, 2009
View PDFchevron_right
Factors associated with successful implantation of nonthoracotomy defibrillation lead systems
David Callans
American Heart Journal, 1996
View PDFchevron_right
Transvenous left ventricular lead implantation with the EASYTRAK lead system: the European experience
Helmut Pürerfellner
The American Journal of Cardiology, 2000
View PDFchevron_right
Lead and device-related complications in the Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillators Trial
Michael Gold
American Heart Journal, 2001
View PDFchevron_right
Management of complications associated with a first-generation endocardial defibrillation lead system for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators
AM Mauro
The American Journal of Cardiology, 1990
View PDFchevron_right
Failure-free survival of the Riata implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead after a very long-term follow-up
Ivo Roca
Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal, 2019
View PDFchevron_right
A novel approach to eliminate intraventricular lead placement in patients with congenital heart disease
Nikhil Gupta
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2012
View PDFchevron_right
Increased incidence of subacute lead perforation noted with one implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
David Milan
Heart Rhythm, 2007
View PDFchevron_right
Implantation by electrophysiologists of 100 consecutive cardioverter defibrillators with nonthoracotomy lead systems
Brian Williamson
Circulation, 1994
View PDFchevron_right
Outcome of the Fidelis implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead advisory: A report from the Canadian Heart Rhythm Society Device Advisory Committee
Jean Champagne
Heart Rhythm, 2008
View PDFchevron_right
Late Complications in Patients with Pectoral Defibrillator Implants with Transvenous Defibrillator Lead Systems: High Incidence of Insulation Breakdown
Anthony Gomes
Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1998
View PDFchevron_right
Long-Term Follow-up of Transvenous Defibrillation Leads
Wataru Shimizu
Circulation Journal, 2006
View PDFchevron_right
Implantation and follow-up of totally subcutaneous versus conventional implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: A multicenter case-control study
Christian Meyer
Heart Rhythm, 2013
View PDFchevron_right
Nonthoracotomy defibrillator implantation: A single-center experience with 200 patients
Hans Scheld
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1994
View PDFchevron_right
A Systematic Review and Single-center Experience of Azygos Vein Defibrillator Lead Insertion
Ketan Koranne
Journal of Innovations in Cardiac Rhythm Management
View PDFchevron_right
Nontraditional Surgical Approaches for Implantation of Pacemaker and Cardioverter Defibrillator Systems in Patients With Limited Venous Access
Patrick Devaleria , Dawn Jaroszewski , Luis Scott
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2009
View PDFchevron_right
Apical versus Non-Apical Lead: Is ICD Lead Position Important for Successful Defibrillation?
Xavier Viñolas
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 2016
View PDFchevron_right
The effectiveness of transvenous leads extractions implanted more than 10 years before
Paweł Syska
Cardiology Journal, 2014
View PDFchevron_right
Comparison between leadless and transvenous single-chamber pacemaker therapy in a referral centre for lead extraction
Maria Bongiorni
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2020
View PDFchevron_right
Acute Efficacy and Chronic Follow-Up of Patients with Non-Thoracotomy Third Generation Implantahle Defibrillators
Thomas Hilbel , Laurence Sterns
Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1994
View PDFchevron_right
Lead Abandonment and Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (S-ICD) Implantation in a Cohort of Patients With ICD Lead Malfunction
gerardo nigro
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, 2021
View PDFchevron_right
The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: A tertiary center experience
Cesar Khazen
Cardiology Journal
View PDFchevron_right
An alternative technique of implanting a nontransvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator system in adults with no or limited venous access to the heart
Marcin Kowalski
Heart Rhythm, 2010
View PDFchevron_right
Five-Year Experience with Implantation and Follow-Up of Transvenous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators: Placing Postimplant Defibrillation Threshold Testing in Perspective
Bernard Rubal
Military Medicine, 2001
View PDFchevron_right
Failure of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator to redetect ventricular fibrillation in patients with a nonthoracotomy lead system
Nam Tran
Circulation, 1992
View PDFchevron_right