Minimally invasive surgery improves short-term outcomes of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in patients with cervical cancer: a propensity-matched analysis with open abdominal surgery (original) (raw)

Feasibility and Functional Outcome of Laparoscopic Nerve Sparing Radical Hysterectomy

Adel Denewer

Zagazig university medical journal, 2018

View PDFchevron_right

Total laparoscopic vs. conventional open abdominal nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: clinical, surgical, oncological and functional outcomes in 301 patients with cervical cancer

Roberto Clarizia

Journal of Gynecologic Oncology

View PDFchevron_right

Success Factors of Laparoscopic Nerve-sparing Radical Hysterectomy for Preserving Bladder Function in Patients with Cervical Cancer: A Protocol-Based Prospective Cohort Study

Yong Song

Annals of surgical oncology, 2014

View PDFchevron_right

Pelvic dysfunctions and quality of life after nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: a multicenter comparative study

Marcello Ceccaroni

Anticancer research, 2012

View PDFchevron_right

Investigating the Role of Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy in Cervical Cancer

Giorgio Bogani

Journal of Investigative Surgery

View PDFchevron_right

Minimally Invasive Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy: A Win-Win Scenario

Giorgio Bogani

Journal of Investigative Surgery

View PDFchevron_right

Bladder function following randomization to two different radical hysterectomy procedures: A prospective study

A. Maggioni, F. Landoni

International Urogynecology Journal, 1991

View PDFchevron_right

Nerve sparing radical hysterectomy: latest developments and historical perspective

Gemma Kenter

Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology, 2003

View PDFchevron_right

A prospective study of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for uterine cervical carcinoma in Taiwan

Will Chiu

Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2012

View PDFchevron_right

Bladder Dysfunction After Radical Hysterectomy: The Role of Tailoring Parametrectomy and Nerve Sparing Surgery in Early Cervical Cancer (Stage IA-IIA FIGO)

Francesco Plotti

Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research, 2020

View PDFchevron_right

Feasibility of early postoperative bladder catheter removal without prior bladder-training exercises after laparoscopic nerve sparing radical hysterectomy

Adel Denewer

Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2019

View PDFchevron_right

Pelvic organ function in randomized patients undergoing laparoscopic or abdominal hysterectomy

Hans Brölmann, Mark Vierhout

Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 2007

View PDFchevron_right

Long-Term Outcomes Following Laparoscopic and Abdominal Supracervical Hysterectomies

Marit Lieng

Obstetrics and Gynecology International, 2010

View PDFchevron_right

A nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: guidelines and feasibility in Western patients

J. Trimbos

International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, 2002

View PDFchevron_right

Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a case control comparative study with total abdominal hysterectomy

Fatema Begum

The Journal of the American Association of …, 1994

View PDFchevron_right

Long-Term Outcomes Following Laparoscopic Supracervical Hysterectomy

Marit Lieng

Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey, 2009

View PDFchevron_right

A comparison of short-term outcomes between laparoscopic supracervical and total hysterectomy

Ayse Citil

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2009

View PDFchevron_right

Perioperative Outcomes Of Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: Comparison With Abdominal, Vaginal, And Robot-Assisted Surgical Approaches

Чавдар Цветков

Journal of Biomedical and Clinical Research, 2015

View PDFchevron_right

Prospective randomized clinical trial of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy

Marie Fidela R. Paraiso

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1999

View PDFchevron_right

Implementation of laparoscopic approach for type B radical hysterectomy: A comparison with open surgical operations

Giorgio Bogani

European Journal of Surgical Oncology (EJSO), 2015

View PDFchevron_right

Nerve-sparing class III radical hysterectomy: a modified technique to spare the pelvic autonomic nerves without compromising radicality

Jatupol Srisomboon, Prapaporn Suprasert

International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, 2006

View PDFchevron_right

Urodynamic changes following laparoscopic versus vaginal hysterectomy

El-Sayed El-Agamy

Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia

View PDFchevron_right

Robotic versus open radical hysterectomy: A comparative study at a single institution

Colleen Feltmate

Gynecologic Oncology, 2008

View PDFchevron_right

Comparing laparoscopic and robotic sacrocolpopexy surgical outcomes with prior versus concomitant hysterectomy

Alexandra Dubinsky

International Urogynecology Journal, 2019

View PDFchevron_right

The eVALuate study: two parallel randomised trials, one comparing laparoscopic with abdominal hysterectomy, the other comparing laparoscopic with vaginal hysterectomy

Jeremy Hawe

BMJ, 2004

View PDFchevron_right

Comparison of Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Morbidity for Gynecologic, Oncologic, and Benign Gynecologic Conditions

Farr Nezhat, MD

JSLS: Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons / Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons

View PDFchevron_right

A case-controlled study of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy versus radical abdominal hysterectomy in a fellowship training program

K. Zakashansky

International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, 2007

View PDFchevron_right

Long-term Pelvic Floor Function and Quality of Life After Radical Surgery for Cervical Cancer: A Multicenter Comparison Between Different Techniques for Radical Hysterectomy With Pelvic Lymphadenectomy

Jacobus van der Velden

International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer, 2016

View PDFchevron_right

Comparison of total laparoscopic, vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy

Klaus Friese

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2008

View PDFchevron_right

Comparison of laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy as endoscopic single-station surgery and conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy—surgical effects on safety and quality of life

Ivo Meinhold-Heerlein

Gynecological Surgery

View PDFchevron_right

A randomized comparison of total or supracervical hysterectomy: surgical complications and clinical outcomes

Deborah Goodman

Obstetrics & …, 2003

View PDFchevron_right

Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: A prospective, randomized, multicenter study

Peter Maher

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1999

View PDFchevron_right

Long term outcome following laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy

Christopher Sutton

BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2001

View PDFchevron_right

Comparison of Laparoscopically Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy and Total Abdominal Hysterectomy

Afsaneh Tehranian

The Medical Journal of The Islamic Republic of Iran, 2008

View PDFchevron_right