Minimally Invasive Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy: A Win-Win Scenario (original) (raw)
Investigating the Role of Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy in Cervical Cancer
Giorgio Bogani
Journal of Investigative Surgery
View PDFchevron_right
Recent Advances in the Surgical Management of Cervical Cancer
K. Zakashansky
Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine: A Journal of Translational and Personalized Medicine, 2000
View PDFchevron_right
Minimally invasive surgery for cervical cancer: consequences for treatment after LACC Study
Rainer Kimmig
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology
View PDFchevron_right
Minimally invasive surgery improves short-term outcomes of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in patients with cervical cancer: a propensity-matched analysis with open abdominal surgery
Diego Rossetti
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology, 2019
View PDFchevron_right
Minimally Invasive versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer
Aldo Lopez
New England Journal of Medicine, 2018
View PDFchevron_right
Endoscopic Surgical Procedures for Cervical Cancer Treatment: A Literature Review
Ospan Mynbaev, Antonio Malvasi, Gianmichele Pavone, Sarah Gustapane, Emanuele Perrone
View PDFchevron_right
Oncologic effectiveness of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer
stefania perotto
Journal of gynecologic oncology, 2018
View PDFchevron_right
Minimally Invasive Surgery: A New Approach for Uterine Cervical Cancer
Nicolae Ioanid
Jurnalul de Chirurgie, 2015
View PDFchevron_right
Nerve Sparing in Radical Surgery for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer
J. Trimbos
International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, 2010
View PDFchevron_right
Robot-assisted radical hysterectomy—perioperative and survival outcomes in patients with cervical cancer compared to laparoscopic and open radical surgery
Angelika Velkova
Gynecological Surgery, 2000
View PDFchevron_right
Comparison between Robotic Radical Hysterectomy with Laparoscopic and Open Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy in the Treatment of Early Stage Cervical Cancer
Boy Busmar
World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery With DVD
View PDFchevron_right
Total laparoscopic vs. conventional open abdominal nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: clinical, surgical, oncological and functional outcomes in 301 patients with cervical cancer
Roberto Clarizia
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology
View PDFchevron_right
Can Lapascopic Nerve-Sparing Ultra-Radical Hysterectomy be used for locally advanced cervical cancer? ---Single-center retrospective study
Wei Wei
View PDFchevron_right
Minimally Invasive Surgery for Cervical Cancer: Should We Look beyond Squamous Cell Carcinoma?
Antonio Simone LaganÃ
J Invest Surg., 2022
View PDFchevron_right
Success Factors of Laparoscopic Nerve-sparing Radical Hysterectomy for Preserving Bladder Function in Patients with Cervical Cancer: A Protocol-Based Prospective Cohort Study
Yong Song
Annals of surgical oncology, 2014
View PDFchevron_right
Long-Term Oncological Outcome After Conventional Radical Hysterectomy Versus 2 Nerve-Sparing Modalities for Early Stage Cervical Cancer
K.N. Gaarenstroom
International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, 2017
View PDFchevron_right
New surgical approaches for the management of cervical carcinoma
Polat Dursun
European Journal of Surgical Oncology (EJSO), 2008
View PDFchevron_right
Comparison of Robotic and laparoscopic Radical type-B and C hysterectomy for cervical cancer: Long term-outcomes
Giorgio Fachechi
Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis, 2017
View PDFchevron_right
Robotic radical hysterectomy versus total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for treatment of early cervical cancer
Farr Nezhat, MD
JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons / Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
View PDFchevron_right
Robot-Assisted Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: Review of Surgical and Oncological Outcomes
Renato Seracchioli
ISRN Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2011
View PDFchevron_right
A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer
Todd Tillmanns
Gynecologic Oncology, 2009
View PDFchevron_right
A Phase III Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Laparoscopic or Robotic Radical Hysterectomy with Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy in Patients with Early Stage Cervical Cancer
Ming-Yin Lin
Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 2008
View PDFchevron_right
Oncological Results of Laparoscopically Assisted Radical Vaginal Hysterectomy in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: Should We Really Abandon Minimally Invasive Surgery?
jaume pahisa
Cancers
View PDFchevron_right
Minimization of curative surgery for treatment of early cervical cancer: a review
Takahiro Kasamatsu, Katsutoshi Oda, Ikuo Konishi
Japanese journal of clinical oncology, 2015
View PDFchevron_right
Conventional versus nerve-sparing radical surgery for cervical cancer: a meta-analysis
Yong Song
Journal of gynecologic oncology, 2015
View PDFchevron_right
Nerve sparing radical hysterectomy: latest developments and historical perspective
Gemma Kenter
Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology, 2003
View PDFchevron_right
Survival Impacts of Perineural Invasion on Patients Under Different Radical Hysterectomies Due to Early Cervical Cancer
Wei Wei
Frontiers in Oncology
View PDFchevron_right
A prospective study of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for uterine cervical carcinoma in Taiwan
Will Chiu
Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2012
View PDFchevron_right
Comparative Study of Laparoscopically Assisted Radical Vaginal Hysterectomy and Open Wertheim-Meigs in Patients With Early-Stage Cervical Cancer
Jaume Pahisa
International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, 2010
View PDFchevron_right