Conflict and Stability in Afghanistan: Methodological Approaches (original) (raw)
Related papers
International Peacekeeping 21: 2, 231-250, 2014
The challenge of building a security sector effective in terms of protecting the population and the state from challengers, and which at the same time fulfils minimum standards of good governance, was a daunting one in Afghanistan. These difficulties were compounded by what in hindsight seem to be obvious mistakes on the part of the intervention. In our paper, we investigate how security sector building fared under such adverse conditions in north-east Afghanistan. We find that in spite of the formidable challenges and the mistakes made by the international intervention, it did not fail completely. Neither did it succeed. Based on the results of quantitative surveys and qualitative research, we suggest that (a) the international intervention was partly successful in building up Afghan National Security Forces – both as a fighting force and in terms of security sector institutions that are restrained to some extent by the rule of law; (b) the problems caused by setting up informal local militias (violent feuds, criminality, human rights abuses and extortion of the population) could be partly mitigated by transforming them into an official local police programme.
The Influence of Regional State Actors in Afghanistan's Political Stability
2021
This study examines the influence of regional state actors in Afghanistan's political stability post2001, focusing on armed extremism and the Afghan opium economy as the two primary factors of instability. The first section employs mainly qualitative research methods to draw conclusions, whilst the second section uses quantitative methods of research. Primary sources such as Wikileaks, "Diplomatic Cables," and "The Afghan War Diary" are used in conjunction with informal interviews. This data is triangulated by secondary sources such as papers by the Brookings Institute and prior academic scholarship. The second section's employment of quantitative correlational research uses data sourced from the World Bank, IMF, Transparency International, and Global Research Centre to synthesise relevant findings. The findings are then presented through theoretical frameworks within international relations theory. Barry Buzan's "regional security complex theory...
War, Peace and Stabilisation: Critically Reconceptualising Stability in Southern Afghanistan
Stability International Journal of Security & Development, 2013
This article critically treats Stabilisation theory and programming through a perspective of peace and conflict, and argues for Stabilisation's reconceptualisation. Through tracking Stabilisation's emergence, it outlines that it is theoretically rooted in an insecurity-underdevelopment problematic, and relies on the Liberal Peace thesis as a solution. When this concept was operationalised in southern Afghanistan, however, it was translated into a praxis informed by state-building and counterinsurgency imperatives. However, after analysis, this is approach was seen to produce confused, sometimes counterproductive, effects: simultaneously engendering a liberal, negative, rented and victor's peace. The article concludes arguing that Stabilisation should be reconceptualised, so that it intends to realise a positive and hybrid peace, if it is to be a more effective policy practice. The first step in this critical rethink is to denaturalise the 'formal' state as being seen as a panacea to all ills of instability.
"Order, stability, and change in Afghanistan: from top-down to bottom-up state-making"
This article presents findings from long-term empirical fieldwork and archival research into current and historical patterns of governance in north-eastern Afghanistan, conducted between 2006 and 2009. Despite the long civil war, striking continuities have been found in the make-up and functioning of the local social order. Patron -client relations, eldership, and related practices of mediation are crucial structuring principles of rural society. They have dominated Afghan politics over centuries and still do today. Viewed from a long-term perspective, this continuity, related patterns of representation, and the role of middlemen and brokers suggest a certain degree of stability, in contrast to the popular perception of instability and disorder in this country. Whilst in the past the expansion of the state relied on tacit agreement between government administrators and local elites, resulting in statemaking from above, the war broadly changed actors, regimes, and coalitions, but not the underlying mechanisms of the social order. Hence, today, the failure of the current statebuilding project can be attributed to the fact that the effects of these mechanisms are insufficiently recognized and grasped by Western actors and state-builders. We argue that local Afghan actors have captured the intervention from below. Instead of state-building, we are dealing here with state-making dominated by patronage networks.
Institution-Centred Conflict Research – Methodological Approach and Application in East Afghanistan
Sökefeld, Martin (Ed.): Spaces of conflict, Bielefeld, transcript., 2015
In this paper I first introduce the methodological approach of institution centred conflict research to investigate this specific aspect of a theory of social order: do institutionalised modes of conflict processing reduce violence, foster social cohesion and enable adaptive change? I then use this approach for a multi-layered empirical research into local dynamics of conflict in Eastern Afghanistan. In the last section I return to the question of social order based on the empirical evidence provided.
Global Tipping Point? Stabilisation in Afghanistan Since 2001
Stabilising the Contemporary Middle East and North Africa, 2019
In many ways, the international intervention in Afghanistan represents a tipping point in global thinking on externally supported stabilisation processes in conflict-affected and fragile states. The Afghanistan stabilisation and state-building project has struggled to achieve sustainable change. In fact, the intervention has had the perverse effect of exacerbating instability and creating new conflict fault lines in some areas. This disappointing outcome has triggered a backlash in many Western states towards intensive, open-ended stabilisation missions. While the stabilisation concept is not without flaws, this paper argues that it was the lack of appropriate preconditions for stabilisation activities coupled with poor implementation that undermined its application. The paper draws six primary lessons from the Afghan stabilisation experience with the potential to inform more effective programmes in comparable contexts.
Building legitimacy and state capacity in Afghanistan
State Fragility, 2022
This chapter demonstrates that Afghanistan has been greatly affected by the persistence of exclusive political and economic institutions, elite rivalry and fragmentation, unsustainable fiscal bases of successive regimes, a weak economy, the landlocked nature of the country and its complex social mosaic. Great power rivalry and multiple invasions of Afghanistan have exacerbated or added to its problems. From 2002 to 2021, significant progress was made in building a representative government, public institutions and legitimacy, expanding public services and guaranteeing the fundamental rights of people. The economy grew substantially, which sustained nearly a decade of strong growth until 2014. The period was also marked by US military intervention, massive foreign military and economic aid to Afghanistan and implementation of paradoxical policies. Nevertheless, the state remained highly fragile before the republic collapsed in August 2021, showing a path dependency in the process of state-building. Subsequently, the return of the Taliban to power reversed many of the gains achieved in the last two decades. This chapter argues that Afghanistan will remain exposed to domestic and external shocks, with great power rivalry affecting it significantly, where the flow and nature of foreign aid will remain crucial for the survival of the state and economy. Building a stable polity in Afghanistan requires a settlement among different local actors as well as among regional and global powers that would bring an end to conflict and external spoilers supporting the conflict through their proxies, and a transition from exclusive politics and development to a more inclusive politics and development. Slow recovery Security and political shocks 2009 Increase in aid and US troops 2014 Security, political and economic shocks Delaying a complete US troops withdrawal, establishing a National Unity Government and sustaining the flow of a modest level of aid to Afghanistan.