Analysis Of Judges' Decisions In Unlawful Causes Of Land Cultivation Without Permits (Study of Decision Number 23/Pdt.G/2020/PN Kis) (original) (raw)
Related papers
The Law Enforcement Against the Criminal Acts of Destruction of Crops
FIAT JUSTISIA
This research uses a normative juridical approach to study the law enforcement against the criminal acts of destruction of crops, about the regulation on the Civil and Agrarian Law. The research approach uses a normative juridical approach that is based on legislation, theories, and concepts related to writing research. The result of the research asserts that the law enforcement against the criminal acts of destruction of crops based on the judges of the Supreme Court Decision No. 1909 K / Pid / 2010, using the viewpoint of Agrarian Law to the principle of horizontal separation asset that the holders of rights to land only control the extent of its surface, while the building or anything inherent in the land have different ownership rights to its land. The criminal law enforcement using viewpoint of Law No. 5 Of 1960 Regarding The Basic Regulations On Agrarian Principles (UUPA) did not need to prove the ownership of the land between the two conflicting party but to prove who the owner of the destroyed crops is. If the plant grows the property of the complainant party then the reported person will meet the elements as perpetrators of criminal acts in the Article 406 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code. However, by using the legal basis of the Law Number 51 PRP of 1960 on Prohibition to Using the Land without Obtaining the Permission from the Owner of the Land or the Authorized Person (the "Law No 51 PRP/1960"), landowners can maintain proprietary rights and submit the case to the legal process procedure, hence it does not need to happen that the crop destruction by the owner of the land will be entangled in criminal law pursuant to the Article 406 paragraph (1) Criminal Code.
JURNAL CITA HUKUM
Article 5 (1) of Law Number 48 Year 2009 concerning Judicial Power becomes ineffective if acentralistic ideology still working in view of the judge. The type of study used in this researchwas a non-doctrinal legal studies (sociolegal research). Research conducted in the DistrictCourt and Religious Court in Madura based on the judges perception by meaning of article 5paragraph (1) law 48/2009 and justices consideration to verdict making process. The resultsshowing the judges majority interpret the Article 5, paragraph 1 Law 28/2009 to legaldiscovery (rechtsvinding) as an efforts if a legal vacuum, otherwise the judges did notinterpret used living law when there are legal gaps. Thus showing domination of the state lawover the law that lives in society. DOI: 10.15408/jch.v5i2.4190
2020
This study aims to determine how the Ratio Decidendie judges and legal consequences of the implementation of verdict on cancellation of certificate of ownership that does not remove the right to land ownership in the State Court of Kendari. This study uses the type of normative juridical research using law approach, conceptual approach and the approach the case with premier legal materials, secondary and tertiary material. Based on the studies concluded that the judges verdict in case number 62 / Pdt.G / 2012 / Pn.Kdi confirming ownership of the Plaintiff. Certificate Revocation Proprietary No. 37 / Anduonuhu Village and property rights certificate No. 38 / Anduonuhu Village through Decision Kendari State Administrative Court No. 29 / G / 2010 / PTUN-Kdi flawed due to its publication of juridical / procedural defect. While consideration by the State Court case number 62 / Pdt.G / 2012 / Pn.Kdi explain pedestal of land rights in the form of Decree of the Governor of the Province of S...
Interpretation of The Legal Values and Justice in The Living Law Related To Court Decision
Sociological Jurisprudence Journal, 2021
The performance of judges in deciding on a legal dispute that is faced is a work process looking for legal norms both in the legislation and legal norms that live in the community. Based on the results of the above studies it can be concluded that; at the practical level there are two approach models used by judges to examine and adjudicate a civil case related to the values and rules of customary law in society, namely an evolutionist approach which holds the view that indigenous peoples are a community with barriers in the process of integration into the modern world, so that this transition process must be guarded through legal procedures. This view has an effect on the pattern of approaches used in dealing with a case related to customary issues and norms living in the community, this approach in view of the formalistic legal approach influenced by the possibility of legism-positivism, so that in some cases the disputed adat the right to customary land in Papu the judge always p...
Contemporary Issues on Interfaith Law and Society
The judge is the spearhead as well as the parameter of justice test conducted by the justice seekers. One of them through decisions issued by the judge, many things that need to be considered and considered by the judge in deciding a case, especially because the justice is universal and the science of law which is a science that is multidisciplinary means not monotonous or only limited to eyeglasses or juridical point of view only but need to pay attention to other values that live, grow, and develop in society both written and written. Article 16 and 28 of Law Number 4 Year 2004 as already amended into Law mandates that judges are prohibited from refusing cases that enter the Court under the pretext that the law does not regulate, it is unclear but is obliged to examine and decide upon the case. Then in article 28 explained that the judge must dig the values that exist in society. This is to ensure a sense of justice for the community because the law is not what is contained in...
Jurnal Poros Hukum Padjadjaran, 2023
Government agencies and/or officials carry out the task of administering the state using legal instruments, one of which is decisions. If within the allotted time a government official does not respond to the request filed against him, his silence is equated with a fictitious decision. The fictitious decisions that apply in Indonesia are positive fictitious decisions, implicitly contained in Article 53 paragraph (3) of Law Number 30 of 2014, namely that the government's silence means a form of acceptance. A positive fictitious decision needs to be submitted to the Administrative Court to get an acceptance decision. After the UUCK, PTUN's authority to decide on positive fictitious decisions was abolished, so what are the legal consequences and whether this is by the AUPB. The research method uses normative juridical with statutory, case, and conceptual approaches. The results of the research show that PTUN does not have the authority to decide on a positive fictitious decision request due to the abolition of Article 53 paragraph (4) in UUCK, so the settlement lies with government agencies. However, there is a disparity in the judge's decision regarding the authority of PTUN to decide on a positive fictitious decision request caused by two approaches, namely legalistic positivism and action. It is possible to enter a positive fictitious case by filing a lawsuit for unlawful acts by government agencies and/or officials. The abolition of PTUN's authority is not by AUPB, especially the principles of legal certainty, expediency, accuracy, and fairness.
Gupta Publications , 2022
The rules of the principle of sustainability in land acquisition for development in the legal system in Indonesia is regulated in Article 2 of the Land Acquisition Law. In addition, the principle of sustainability in the Land Acquisition Law is seen as a program from the idea of sustainable development which has been translated into Indonesian with the term sustainable development. Furthermore, the Land Acquisition Law also mandates that its implementation must be carried out through a more complete and more technical elaboration in a Government Regulation (Peraturan pemerintah/ PP). To fulfill these provisions, thus PP No. 19 of 2021 concerning Land Acquisition had been signed by the President after almost a decade from the time of the Land Acquisition Law enaction.The main discussion of this research is: is the form of compensation based on the Government Regulation (Peraturan Pemerintah/ PP) No. 19 of 2021 concerning the Implementation of Law No. 2 of 2012 (Land Acquisition Law) in-line with the sustainability principle in the Land Acquisition Law?. The research method used by the authors is normative juridical research. This research carried out by studying and reviewing legislation and legal theory in Indonesia in accordance with the problems to be studied. The legal material collection method used in this study is the library research method which means that this research is performed by the author through reading, summarizing, and reviewing library materials related to this study in the form of literature, relevant laws, regulations, and directly related to the object of research that is studied and used as a theoretical basis. Then the materials are processed qualitatively and then presented descriptively through explanation, definition, and description according to the problems that are discussed in this research. The results of this study is the Government Regulation (Peraturan Pemerintah/ PP) No. 19 of 2021 concerning the Implementation of Law No. 2 of 2012 (Land Acquisition Law) is still considered not in line with the sustainability principle in the Land Acquisition Law. Specifically, the norm whose contents have inconsistent characteristics is the norm that regulated in Article 77 of the PP on Land Acquisition. This norm still implicitly stipulates that the main form of compensation is in the form of money. Whereas as is known in this discussion, money is a form of compensation with the lowest value when viewed from the principle of sustainability, whereas in fact there are other forms of compensation that have some sustainability values.
Against The Law In Pollution of The Environment
Proceedings of Malikussaleh International Conference on Law, Legal Studies and Social Science (MICoLLS)
This study aims to determine & analyze the forms of unlawful acts regulated in law Number 32 of 2009 Concerning Environmental Protection And Management and to find out the judges’ Considerations in Imposing Civil Decisios Againtst Pollution Perpetrators in Enviromental Cases Number 735/Pdt/G-LH/2018/PN.Jkt.utr. The method used in this research is using normative juridical research which is library law research conducted by reviewing library legal material to obtain theoretical secondary data, while the type of research used in this study is qualitative research and the nature of the research. Used is descriptive analysis, from the results of research violations of law Number 32 of 2009 Concerning Environmental And Management can lead to acts againts the law, the judge decided to grant part of the plaintiff’s demans because PT How Are You Indonesia was proven to have committed acts againts the law by polluting the environmental, life a result of the results of their ...
Modin dan Otoritasnya; Studi Kasus Larangan Kawin Hamil Di Kelurahan Temas Kota Batu
YUDISIA : Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum dan Hukum Islam, 2020
This study discusses the modin and its authority as the officers of the marriage registrar in Temas village. The focus of this study is the idea of banning pregnant marriage by modin. Pregnant women who want to marry are prohibited from doing marriage until she gives birth. This study is an empirical research of law by placing sociology of law as its approach. This research puts the theory of legal authority and reasoning in anlyzing data. Related to the theory of legal authority, the theory of Freidman and Khaled Abou el-Fadhl was chosen for legal sociology analysis. The three things which are focus of this study are about why did modin issue the policy, how is the policy authority position, and how did modin interpretation of article 53 KHI related to the prohibition of pregnant marriage. First, this study shows that there are two major narratives (sociological reasons) of why modin should implement the idea; these are preventing stigmatization of free sex and preserving the lineage. Second, through the theory of autorithy, modin got three authorities at once; persuasive authority, traditional authority, and charismatic authority. Therefore, that policy automatically had the authoroty. Third, in constructing his idea, modin applied three interpretation methods; authentical interpretation, sociological interpretation, and historical interpretation.