Predictors of long-term outcomes with hip resurfacing (original) (raw)

Differences in hip morphology between the sexes in patients undergoing hip resurfacing

Charles Willis-Owen

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 2010

View PDFchevron_right

The ScanHip ® total hip arthroplasty: Radiographic assessment of 72 hips after 10 years

Hans Wingstrand

Acta Orthopaedica, 2002

View PDFchevron_right

Biomechanical reconstruction of the hip: A RANDOMISED STUDY COMPARING TOTAL HIP RESURFACING AND TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY

P. Vendittoli

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, 2006

View PDFchevron_right

Uncemented total hip arthroplasty: radiological postoperative assessment after a 10-year minimum follow-up LEONARDO CARBONERA BOSCHIN1, OTÁVIO LAZZARIS ANACLETO2, PAULO GILBERTO CIMBALISTA ALENCAR3

Leonardo Boschin

2003

View PDFchevron_right

Stability of the Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty at two years: A RADIOSTEREOPHOTOGRAMMETRIC ANALYSIS STUDY

Arne Lundberg

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, 2005

View PDFchevron_right

Results of Birmingham hip resurfacing at 12 to 15 years: a single-surgeon series

Joseph Daniel

The bone & joint journal, 2014

View PDFchevron_right

Birmingham hip resurfacing at a mean of ten years: results from an independent centre

Andrew Shimmin

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume, 2012

View PDFchevron_right

Study on correlation between combined femoral and acetabular anteversion in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty using CT scan

Dr Harish Murthy

International Journal of Research in Orthopaedics, 2016

View PDFchevron_right

Hip resurfacing: expectations and limitations

Koen De Smet

Acta Orthopaedica, 2009

View PDFchevron_right

Years Follow-Up of Hip Revision Surgery

hatem orban

2012

View PDFchevron_right

Postoperative radiograph of the hip arthroplasty: what the radiologist should know

Filip Vanhoenacker

Insights into Imaging, 2015

View PDFchevron_right

A five-year radiostereometric follow-up of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty

Arne Lundberg

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, 2007

View PDFchevron_right

The results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacings at a mean of five years

Andrew Shimmin

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 2007

View PDFchevron_right

Pre-Existing Hip Pathology in Younger Patients Undergoing Resurfacing Arthroplasty

James Berstock

View PDFchevron_right

Results of hip resurfacing

Filippo Casella

International Orthopaedics, 2011

View PDFchevron_right

Hip Resurfacing and Conventional THA: Comparison of Acetabular Bone Stock Removal, Leg Length, and Offset

Jared Foran

Orthopedics, 2013

View PDFchevron_right

Five-Year clinical and radiographic follow-up of the uncemented long-term stable fixation total hip arthroplasty

Robert Barrack

The Journal of Arthroplasty, 1998

View PDFchevron_right

Perioperative changes in pelvic tilt after hip resurfacing using a direct lateral approach

Jordan Patterson

Annals of Translational Medicine, 2021

View PDFchevron_right

Radiological comparison of acetabular anteversion on roentgenograms and computed tomograms functional outcomes in total hip arthroplasty

Ayush raj

2021

View PDFchevron_right

Resurfacing hip prostheses revisited

Rob Nelissen

International Orthopaedics, 2005

View PDFchevron_right

Radiographic Assessment of Biomechanical Parameters following hip Resurfacing and Cemented Total Hip Arthroplasty

Nadim Aslam

HIP International, 2009

View PDFchevron_right

Radiographic changes of the femoral neck after total hip resurfacing

P. Vendittoli

Orthopaedics & Traumatology-surgery & Research, 2011

View PDFchevron_right

Birmingham hip resurfacing: Short term results

Mehtap Balaban

Annals of Medical Research

View PDFchevron_right

The Hip Joint in Adults

Alejandro Navarro Sotelo

View PDFchevron_right

Resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip

Richard Villar

Archives of Orthopaedic and Traumatic Surgery, 1979

View PDFchevron_right

Hip resurfacing: why does it fail? Early results and critical analysis of our first 60 cases

gabriele panegrossi

International Orthopaedics, 2007

View PDFchevron_right

Re-revision total hip arthroplasty: Epidemiology and factors associated with outcomes

Richard Iorio

Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma, 2020

View PDFchevron_right

Variations in acetabular anatomy with reference to total hip replacement

Branislav Jaramaz

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, 2008

View PDFchevron_right

Introductory Chapter: Hip Surgeries

Nahum Rosenberg

Hip Surgeries [Working Title]

View PDFchevron_right

Birmingham hip resurfacing: IS ACETABULAR BONE CONSERVED?

Y. Kalairajah

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, 2008

View PDFchevron_right

Patterns of Changes in Femoral Bone Mineral Density Up To Five Years After Hip Resurfacing

Munawar Hashmi

The Journal of Arthroplasty, 2013

View PDFchevron_right

Dynamics of femoral bone remodelling in well fixed total hip arthroplasty. A 20-year follow-up of 20 hips

Hans Wingstrand

Hip International, 2013

View PDFchevron_right

The reaction of the pelvis to the implantation of the acetabular component of the hip endoprosthesis--initial tests with the use of computerized tomography

Romuald Będziński

Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics / Wrocław University of Technology, 2009

View PDFchevron_right

Birmingham hip resurfacing

Pradeep Moonot

The journal of bone and joint surgery, 2008

View PDFchevron_right

Measurement of Bone Defects Adjacent to Acetabular Components of Hip Replacement

David Findlay

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2003

View PDFchevron_right