The Tukey Honestly Significant Difference Procedure and Its Control of the Type I Error-Rate (original) (raw)

Scientia Agricola, 2008

View PDFchevron_right

Multiple comparison test by Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD): Do the confident level control type I error

Abikesh P K Mahapatra

International Journal of Statistics and Applied Mathematics , 2021

View PDFchevron_right

Tukey's Honestly Signiflcant Difierence (HSD) Test

Lynne J. Williams

View PDFchevron_right

Minimal clinically important differences: review of methods

vibeke strand

The Journal of rheumatology, 2001

View PDFchevron_right

Type I Error of Four Pairwise Mean Comparison Procedures Conducted as Protected and Unprotected Tests

Jackson Barnette

Journal of modern applied statistical methods: JMASM

View PDFchevron_right

Using the Tukey-Kramer omnibus test in the Hayter-Fisher procedure

S. Richter

British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 2012

View PDFchevron_right

Minimal clinically important difference module: summary, recommendations, and research agenda

vibeke strand

The Journal of Rheumatology

View PDFchevron_right

Testing minimal clinically important difference: consensus or conundrum?

Robert Gatchel

The Spine Journal, 2010

View PDFchevron_right

A Comparison of Four Methods for the Analysis of N-of-1 Trials

Xinlin CHEN

PLoS ONE, 2014

View PDFchevron_right

A Comparison of Type I Error Rates of Alpha-Max with Established Multiple Comparison Procedures

Jackson Barnette

1997

View PDFchevron_right

A comparison of two procedures for testing multiple contrasts

Jane Perlmutter

Psychological Bulletin, 1973

View PDFchevron_right

Methods for Specifying the Target Difference in a Randomised Controlled Trial: The Difference ELicitation in TriAls (DELTA) Systematic Review

Jenni Hislop

2014

View PDFchevron_right

The Protocol of a Comparative Clinical Study: Statistical Considerations

Ahmed Hassouna

Springer eBooks, 2023

View PDFchevron_right

MSERA Volume 5 , Number 2 Fall 1998 SPECIAL ISSUE STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE TESTING

James McLean

View PDFchevron_right

Newman–Keuls Test and Tukey Test

Lynne J. Williams

Encyclopedia of Research Design, 2010

View PDFchevron_right

Choosing a Multiple Comparison Procedure Based on Alpha

Jackson Barnette

1999

View PDFchevron_right

Assessing Clinical Significance: Does It Matter Which Method We Use

Jamie Bedics

Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 2005

View PDFchevron_right

Comparison of the Two-Sided Single Triangular Test to the Double Triangular Test

Véronique Sébille

Controlled Clinical Trials, 2001

View PDFchevron_right

Design, Analysis, and Interpretation of Method-Comparison Studies

Sandra Hanneman

AACN Advanced Critical Care, 2008

View PDFchevron_right

The thresholds for statistical and clinical significance – a five-step procedure for evaluation of intervention effects in randomised clinical trials

Christian Gluud

BMC Medical Research Methodology, 2014

View PDFchevron_right

Pairwise multiple comparison procedures: A review

James Jaccard

Psychological Bulletin, 1984

View PDFchevron_right

Alpha-Max: A Novel New Multiple Comparison Procedure

Jackson Barnette

1996

View PDFchevron_right

Inferential methods for comparing a single case with a control sample: modified t‐tests versus mycroft et al.'s (2002) modified anova

Paul Garthwaite

Cognitive Neuropsychology, 2004

View PDFchevron_right

Précis of Statistical significance: Rationale, validity, and utility

Siu L. Chow

Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1998

View PDFchevron_right

Clinical Versus Reliable and Significant Change

Larry Beutler

View PDFchevron_right

Evaluating statistical difference, equivalence, and indeterminancy using inferential confidence intervals: An integrated alternative method of conducting null hypothesis statistical tests

Warren Tryon

Psychological Methods, 2001

View PDFchevron_right

A SAS® macro implementation of a multiple comparison post hoc test for a Kruskal-Wallis analysis

Linda S Hynan

Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 2011

View PDFchevron_right

Reconsidering the status of tests of significance: An alternative criterion of adequacy

R. Murray lindsay

Accounting, Organizations and Society, 1995

View PDFchevron_right

Evaluating Statistical Difference, Equivalence, and Indeterminacy Using Inferential Confidence Intervals: An Integrated Alternative Method of Conducting Null Hypothesis Statistical Tests

Warren Tryon

Psychological Methods, 2001

View PDFchevron_right

A New Effect Modification P Value test Deomstrated

Manoj B A N S I D A S Agravat

View PDFchevron_right

Alpha-Max: A Novel New Multiple Comparison Procedure; ED406405; EDRS PRICE MF01/PCO2 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Comparative Analysis; *Statistical Significance IDENTIFIERS *Bonferroni Procedure; Multiple Comparisons

James McLean

View PDFchevron_right

From statistical significance to clinical relevance

Wayne Levy

Clinical & Experimental Allergy, 2010

View PDFchevron_right

The reference change value: a proposal to interpret laboratory reports in serial testing based on biological variation

Omar Omran

View PDFchevron_right

The Tukey Honestly Significant Difference Procedure and Its Control of the Type I Error-Rate (original) (raw)

Related papers