P.078 Pre-emptive analgesic efficacy of different analgesics after third molar surgery (original) (raw)
Comparative study of the anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine versus 2% lidocaine in inferior alveolar nerve block during surgical extraction of impacted lower third molars
Alejandro Rebolledo
View PDFchevron_right
[A comparison of the clinical anesthetic efficacy of articaine infiltration and lidocaine blocking for microport extraction of impacted mandibular molar]
Adriana Calvo
2011
View PDFchevron_right
Evaluation of the Anaesthetic Efficacy of 4% Articaine with 1:200000 Epinephrine Versus 2% Lignocaine with 1:200000 Epinephrine in Simple Extractions of Mandibular Posterior Teeth
rishi rath
Journal of Bioequivalence & Bioavailability, 2016
View PDFchevron_right
The Onset, Extent and Duration of Action of Local Anaesthesia Using Articaine in Maxillary Tooth Extraction
Mimansa Bhoj
2020
View PDFchevron_right
Comparison of the Local Anaesthetic Effect of 4 % Articaine and 2 % Lidocaine AdministeredUsing Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block Technique in Primary Mandibular Molar Extractions
Riyas Rifnas Ahamed
Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences, 2021
View PDFchevron_right
Anesthetic Efficacy of Buccal Infiltration Articaine versus Lidocaine for Extraction of Primary Molar Teeth
Akshat Agrawal
Anesthesia Progress, 2019
View PDFchevron_right
Comparative studies of the anaesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine used as mandibular infiltration versus 2% lidocaine used as inferior dental nerve block in extraction and pulpotomy of mandibular primary molars
Fatma Alzahrani
2015
View PDFchevron_right
A comparative evaluation of the efficacy of 4% articaine (1:100000 adrenaline) and 2% lignocaine (1:100000 adrenaline) in surgical extraction of mandibular third molars
Simran Pawar
International Journal of Recent Scientific Research, 2017
View PDFchevron_right
Assessment of Intraoperative Pain in Mandibular Third Molar Extractions with Articaine-A Retrospective Study
International Journal of Dentistry and Oral Science (IJDOS)
SciDoc Publishers, 2021
View PDFchevron_right
Evaluation of the anaesthetic properties and tolerance of 1:100,000 articaine versus 1:100,000 lidocaine. A comparative study in surgery of the lower third molar
Cristina Barona
Medicina Oral Patología Oral y Cirugia Bucal, 2012
View PDFchevron_right
Comparison of 4% articaine administration with epinephrine (1:100.000) versus without epinephrine in inferior alveolar block for tooth extraction – double blind, randomized clinical trial of anesthetic efficacy
Peer Kämmerer
View PDFchevron_right
Comparison of 4% articaine with epinephrine (1:100,000) and without epinephrine in inferior alveolar block for tooth extraction: double-blind randomized clinical trial of anesthetic efficacy
Victor Palarie
Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodontology
View PDFchevron_right
Comparative Study of the Efficacy of 4% Articaine vs 2% Lidocaine in Surgical Removal of Bilaterally Impacted Mandibular Third Molars
Shekhar Kapoor
The journal of contemporary dental practice, 2018
View PDFchevron_right
Anaesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine and 2% lidocaine for extraction and pulpotomy of mandibular primary molars: an equivalence parallel prospective randomized controlled trial
Fatma Alzahrani
International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry, 2018
View PDFchevron_right
Articaine and mepivacaine efficacy in postoperative analgesia for lower third molar removal: a double-blind, randomized, crossover study
Carlos Santos
Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology, 2006
View PDFchevron_right
Evaluation of lidocaine and mepivacaine for inferior third molar surgery
Gabriela Porto
View PDFchevron_right
A comparison of the clinical anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine and 0.5% bupivacaine (both with 1:200,000 epinephrine) for lower third molar removal
thiago thiago
Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodontology, 2008
View PDFchevron_right
Comparison between lidocaine and 50/50 mixture of lidocaine with bupivacaine when used in inferior alveolar nerve and lingual nerve block for patients undergoing third molar surgery
Dr.Shanavas Palliyal
International Journal of Oral Health Dentistry, 2018
View PDFchevron_right
Articaine Infiltration for Anesthesia of Mandibular First Molars
Mohammad Dib
View PDFchevron_right
Comparison of onset anesthesia time and injection discomfort of 4% articaine and 2% mepivacaine during teeth extractions
Ahmad Alnazzawi
Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia, 2017
View PDFchevron_right
The Efficacy of 4% Articaine Infiltration Anesthesia in the Extraction of Mandibular Molars: A Randomized Controlled Study
Salwan Bede
2020
View PDFchevron_right
Comparison of Efficacy and Patient Response Between 2% Lidocaine and 4% Articaine during Routine Dental Extractions
Dr. Saba Nasreen
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2022
View PDFchevron_right
The Efficacy of Two Different Concentrations of Local Anaesthetic on Pain in Mandibular Third Molar Surgery
Basel Mahardawi
Archives of Orofacial Sciences, 2020
View PDFchevron_right
Comparative Analysis of the Anesthetic Efficacy of 0.5% Ropivacaine Versus 2% Lignocaine Hydrochloride with Adrenaline (1:80,000) for Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Surgical Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars
Rishi Bali
Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, 2020
View PDFchevron_right
Efficacy of 2 % lidocaine and 4 % articaine in mandibular molars with different pulp diagnoses in the mandibular technique 1
Adel Martínez
2018
View PDFchevron_right
Comparative Analysis of the Anesthetic Efficacy of 0.5 and 0.75 % Ropivacaine for Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Surgical Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars
Ashwini Deshpande
Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, 2013
View PDFchevron_right
The efficacy of an elevated concentration of lidocaine HCl in impacted lower third molar surgery
Callum Durward
Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, 2015
View PDFchevron_right
Anesthetic efficacy of articaine and lidocaine for incisive/mental nerve block
M. Volpato
2010
View PDFchevron_right
Epinephrine concentration (1:100,000 or 1:200,000) does not affect the clinical efficacy of 4% articaine for lower third molar removal: a double-blind, randomized, crossover study
Carlos Santos
Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, 2007
View PDFchevron_right
4% Lidocaine Versus 4% Articaine for Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Impacted Lower Third Molar Surgery
Natthamet Wongsirichat
Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine
View PDFchevron_right
Efficacy of Minimal Volume of Articaine Local Anesthetic for Buccal Infiltration During Extraction of Maxillary and Mandibular First and Second Molars: A Prospective Study
Monalisa Banerjee
Clinical Case Reports: Open Access, 2021
View PDFchevron_right
A Comparison of the Efficacy of 4% Articaine with 1:100,000 Epinephrine and 2% Lidocaine with 1:80,000 Epinephrine in Achieving Pulpal Anesthesia in Maxillary Teeth with Irreversible Pulpitis
Jean-Charles Michonneau
View PDFchevron_right