Limiting Strategic Technology: The Need for National Self-Restraint (original) (raw)
Related papers
Academia.edu, 2023
As peace has always remained elusive between Pakistan and India relationship, the need for it has never been greater than today. The areas of significance are Pakistan’s lasting commitment towards regional peace; the development of Pak-India relations in the post-nuclear era; the current and emerging dynamics of regional peace and security; the need for mutual cooperation between India and Pakistan in the areas of politics and security. The presence of disputes, the danger of crisis escalation, conventional and non- conventional arms build and deterrence instability in South Asia replicates many features of the Cold War strategic rivalry between the United States and Soviet Union. On a deeper level, Pakistan and India’s rivalry can said to be even more dangerous than that of the United States and Soviet Union. Strategic Restraint Regime Approach: The threats that geographical proximity and technological developments present necessitate the implementation of Pakistan’s proposed Strategic Restraint Regime. . As Pakistan and India have both been living under the nuclear shadow for two decades now, it is now an appropriate time for both countries to consider a strategic restraint regime to prevent strategic vulnerabilities and improve level of trust among each other for larger regional and global peace.
Strategic Concept for the Regulation of Arms Possession andProliferation
2008
of main points Policy on nuclear and other WMD non-proliferation, arms control, and disarmament should be integrated with strategy on conventional weapons to implement a holistic approach within a new Strategic Concept for the Regulation of Arms Possession and Proliferation. Existing agreements on non-proliferation, arms control, and disarmament should be viewed as platforms for expansion rather than relics in need of repair. The NPT regime faces an uncertain future and the importance of the 2010 meeting hinges on all states parties (and those 3 outside) working cooperatively to address the issue of nuclear weapons and civil energy in the context of global and regional security needs. Non-proliferation policy has produced useful innovations in law-based approaches but needs to be reconnected to the strategy of security through effective and verifiable agreements.
Arms Control and National Security
2002
It is hard to imagine how the tragedy of September 11 could have been worse. Yet, the truth is that a single attack involving a nuclear or biological weapon could have killed millions. While the world was unable to prevent the 11 September attacks, there is much we can do to help prevent future terrorist acts carried out with weapons of mass destruction. The greatest danger arises from a non-State group--or even an individual-acquiring and using a nuclear, bio-
A Case for Controlled Nuclear Proliferation
Voices on Peace and War, 2024
The arms reduction treaties negotiated between the United States and the Soviet Union have become irrelevant. Since Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022, proclamations of threats of nuclear war have become commonplace. Proliferation of nuclear weapons has proceeded unabated. To get ahead of this set of runaway problems, the United States will have to walk away from its long-standing nuclear non-proliferation policy. Instead, Washington will better defend Western democracies and pro-Western nations by replacing it with a policy of controlled proliferation. America’s highly reliable allies, such as Canada and Australia, have to be encouraged and assisted in developing their own nuclear weapons. They will have to develop or purchase relevant delivery systems as well as maintain their own nuclear deterrence capabilities.
Arms Control in an Age of Strategic and Military Revolution
Text of Presentation to Einstein Forum, Berlin, 15 Nov 2005. Changes in the nature of warfare, military technology, and the global strategic environment pose new challenges for arms control. The article critically examines new forms of strategic warfare, cyber-war, so-called “precision” conventional warfare, global conventional strike weapons, and less-lethal weaponry.
How Much Is Enough? The Politics of Technology and Weaponless Nuclear Deterrence
This chapter contributes to the literature on nuclear proliferation by bringing theoretical resources from political philosophy and science and technology studies (STS) to bear on perennial questions for scholars of international relations (IR): “Why do states build nuclear weapons?” and “How many nuclear weapons are enough to sustain a credible nuclear deterrent?” We argue that states build nuclear weapons when they perceive the benefits of creating and maintaining a nuclear arsenal as outweighing the costs. If, therefore, a state is able to reap the benefits of having a nuclear weapon without actually creating one, it will have no reason to forego membership in the Nonproliferation Treaty. Furthermore, states with latent nuclear weapon programs are already actively engaging in a form of “weaponless” nuclear deterrence. Far from existing only in imagination, the “virtual” arsenals of the future are already observable in the nuclear security strategies of non-nuclear weapon states today. In making this argument, we draw on emergent theories of nuclear technopolitics that focus on the ambivalence
ARMS CONTROL CONTINUUMS Connecting the small arms debate to nuclear arms control
In July 2001, member states will gather in New York for the UN Conference on the Illicit Trade in Arms in All its Aspects. It represents part of the effort to establish controls on small arms and light weapons. This article argues that it is possible that nuclear and conventional arms control represent two ends of a continuum, with common goals and a common set of mechanisms and processes at work. A decade after the end of the Cold War, it is not surprising that the international community is working on mechanisms to deal with conventional arms. The existence of a continuum and connections between conventional and nuclear arms control is less evident. The two arms coniml communities appear to function in isolation of each other. The rehlrn to the debate on small arms and light weapons echces post-World War I and XI periods, The fact that small arms control is back on the-agenda within the context of the UN may signify recognition that any kind of arms control serves the same purpose - preventing and mitigating the effects and duration of, and bringmg an end to conflict.
ARMS RACE IN THE 21 ST CENTURY: CONSEQUENCES AND MITIGATING MEASURES
Global Journal of Social Sciences , 2022
Historically, arms races generate a great deal of interest both in the academia and policy circles for a variety of reasons. They are widely believed to have significant consequences for states' security. In the debate over their consequences, one side holds that arms races increase the probability of war by undermining military stability and straining political relations. The opposing view holds that engaging in an arms race is often a state's best option for avoiding war when faced with an aggressive adversary. The 21 st Century is witnessing the return of arms race amongst states. Coupling with the advancements in technology, the menace of arms race in the 21st Century, therefore, if not curtailed could lead to war more devastating than witnessed in the last century. Using basic content analysis the study revealed that the 21 st Century arms races are mainly in the area of nuclear weapons, hypersonic missiles, missile defence, cyber-warfare, and space weaponisation. The arms races are prominently amongst the world"s great powers such as the United States of America, Russia, and China as well as developing states like Iran and North Korea. This study discovered that nuclear weapons are still at the forefront of arms race in the 21 st Century, despite efforts to reduce their role in global affairs and to negotiate further reductions in quantity. Also, states like the USA, China, and Russia are exploiting the advantage of speed and manoeuvrability to engage in arms race in hypersonic missiles. This has prompted nations to compete in the development of missile defences in order to counter the present missile threats. Furthermore, in anticipation for future warfare, nations such as the USA, China, and Russia are in arms race to weaponsise space by deploying space to space, earth to space and space to earth weapons, where appropriate. War in the 21 st Century could in turn lead to more human, material, and environmental casualties due to the latest advancement in technologies and modernisation of existing weapons and associated equipments. Consequently, measures are needed to ensure that arms races in the 21 st Century, if not eliminated, are reduced to the barest minimum in order to promote international peace and security. Renewed commitments on existing arms control measures, formulation of new arms control measures, and the complete elimination of nuclear weapons are the measures that could be considered.