Medieval Georgian Coinage: A Cross-Cultural Introduction (original) (raw)
This article surveys the medieval coinage minted on Georgian lands to the Mongol age. Aimed at college-level pedagogy, it underscores the benefits of contextualizing this rich numismatic record regionally, ecumenically, and cross-culturally. The Christianization of the region named for the Caucasus Mountains, which accelerated after the royal conversions of the fourth century, heightened the isthmus' long-standing cross-cultural condition. Meanwhile, Caucasia's traditional socio-cultural orientation southwards, especially towards Iran, did not come to an end with the entrenchment of Christianity. Since the Iron Age, Caucasia has been an active component of the Iranic (Persianate) world. The formation of the dār al-Islām and its extension across Caucasia did not thwart the southwards orientation. In Georgian lands, Islamic types and Arabic inscriptions were commonplace on the local coinage produced by Muslims and Christians alike. The Georgian Bagratids, identifying themselves as a Christian Byzantine-like dynasty, continued to deploy Islamic types on their coinage even during its "Golden Age" in the eleventh to early thirteenth century. At the same time, the nexus of the Iranian and Persianate world, on the one hand, and Caucasia, on the other, endured and evolved. The chronological span investigated here is appropriately bookended by coins embodying imperial hegemonies whose epicenters were located in Iran (i.e., the Sasanians and the Ilkhans).
Related papers
On the Origin of Coin Type Spread in the Near East (Coin of the Georgian King Giorgi III (1174
BULLETIN OF THE GEORGIAN NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, vol. 16, no. 4, , 2022
The subject of present paper is the study of iconographic peculiarities of a numismatic monument of medieval Georgia-copper coin minted in 1174 by Giorgi III (1157-1184). Style of representation of Giorgi III, his attire and royal paraphernalia, occupies a distinct place in a set of portrayals of medieval secular authorities. Lately obtained specimens have substantiated an assumption suggested by Mikheil Barataeff (Baratashvili) in 1844 that king appears on coin clad in military armor. Motif of coin depicts an image of powerful king familiar to the Islamic world, therefore defining this world as its addressee. Eclecticism and ambitious message of the central design is connected to specific historical event, namely the takeover of Ani and striking coins at the local mint. Carried out research of roots of Orientalizing style of representation lead to conjecture that coin issued by Giorgi III stands out not only for introduction of extravagant features like the image of the king-hunter and military attire. It became evident that a portrait of a king sitting with his legs crossed did not occur on Islamic coins prior to 1174, i.e. before minting these coins. The motif introduced by Georgian king as a coin type, antedates coin types spread in the Near East later on which testifies to the political prowess of Georgian kingdom in the milieu of Muslim countries.
Historische Anthropologie 27.1, 2019
This paper uses the framework of numismatic practice—socially contextualized coin use—to explore how “money” developed meaning in the ancient Caucasus. Traditional approaches to monetization at the edges of ancient imperial space view the expansion of coinage as an outgrowth of imperial programs. In contrast, this exploration demonstrates that coins were used to construct and maintain diverse and overlapping regimes of value, shaped by regional priorities rather than imported norms. Within this system, the use of coins in mortuary contexts became an especially durable social practice.
Telavi Hoard: New Data on the Ottoman Coinage Minted in the Georgian Kingdom of K’akheti
5th Simone Assemani Symposium on Islamic Coins, Rome, 29-30 September 2017. Edited by Bruno Callegher and Arianna D’Ottone Rambach. Trieste: EUT, 2018, 2018
P. 309-342. Recent discoveries have provided us with new numismatic material elucidating the coin-minting activities in the easternmost Georgian province of K’akheti (mints Zagam and Kākhed). However, so far we had no contemporary monetary complexes / hoards, as opposed to the plethora of single finds, unfortunately deprived from the proper archeological context. Our objective is to discuss and publish one of the rare hoards of the epoch, predominantly comprised of the coins minted there in the name of the Ottoman sultan. The hoard (137.90 g) was discovered back in 2016 in the vicinity of the city of Telavi. It constituted an accumulation of 56 silver coins in total (110.25 g, 79.97% of hoard weight); hacksilver (19.18 g; 13.91%); bronze pendant and a small bead, 0.13 g (3.55 g, 2.57%); gold ring with turquoise (4.89 g; 3.55%) – it constituted up to 35-40% of the hoard’s total value (parallels with contemporary Georgian icon-art art were analyzed). Monetary part of the hoard: 1/56 (1.79%) Muscovy coin (0.32 g, 0.29% of the weight of the monetary part of the hoard); functionally, probably hacksilver; 39/56 (69.64%) Ottoman coins minted / countermarked in K’akheti (77.52 g, 70.31%); 12/56 (21.43%) Ottoman coins of distinguishable type, with no mint (26.76 g, 24.27%); 4/56 (7.14%) unidentified coins (5.65 g, 5.12%). We provide the description of the coin types, incl. two previously unknown ones. The Moscow denga constituted a negligible and probably accidental admixture to the main body of Caucasian/Georgian-Ottoman coins. Only two mint-names were indicated on the coins: Kākhed (11 coins; 22.78 g; 19.64% of the total number of coins, 20.66% of the weight of the monetary part of the hoard), Zagam (28; 54.74 g; 50%, 49.65%). We also made an attempt to establish the weight standard of the coins represented in the hoard. The host coins with Zagam c/m pertained to the same, or similar weight standard. All the coins were the Ottoman dirhams of 1.80-2.80 g, of declining weight-standard. We tentatively dated the hoard with the early 1600s. This was a short-term accumulation hoard (a momentary snapshot of the local contemporary monetary circulation). The historical significance of the Telavi hoard is multifaceted: The non-monetary items may be helpful for studying the history of Georgian art and craftsmanship; we obtained additional factual evidence for the contemporary numismatic history (incl. the discovery of new types and new data for the metrology analysis, insight into contemporary monetary circulation and coin-minting activities). The very fact of the Ottoman type coinage minted in Georgia/K’akheti constitutes an extremely remarkable historical evidence, and its significance exceeds the relative limitedness of “pure” numismatics.
The Ukrainian Numismatic Annual, Issue 5 , 2021
Paghava Irakli, Turkia Severiane. “New Mintname “Georgia” (“Jurzān”): Researching the History of Georgia and the ‘Abbāsid North in the 8th-9th Centuries”. The Ukrainian Numismatic Annual, Issue 5 (2021), 228-258. The goal of this work is to publish two 'Abbāsid coins, anonymous AH 152 fals (weight 2.42 g, dimensions 22.5 mm, die axis 9 o'clock) and AH 240 dīnar (weight 4.38 g), citing al-Mutawakkil and the heir al-Mu'tazz Billāh, both bearing the previously unpublished and unresearched mintname Jurzān; also re-publish AH 248 dīnar (weight 4.21 g) citing al-Musta'īn Billāh, of Tiflīs mint. Jurzān mintname is being published and discussed for the first time by means of this article.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.