Temporal gap detection thresholds in sinusoidal markers simulated with a single-channel envelope detector model (original) (raw)
Related papers
Detection of temporal gaps in sinusoids by normally hearing and hearing-impaired subjects
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1989
A two-alternative forced-choice task was used to measure psychometric functions for the detection of temporal gaps in a 1-kHz, 400-ms sinusoidal signal. The signal always started and finished at a positive-going zero crossing, and the gap duration was varied from 0.5 to 6.0 ms in 0.5-ms steps. The signal level was 80 dB SPL, and a spectrally shaped noise was used to mask splatter associated with the abrupt onset and offset of the signal. Two subjects with normal hearing, two subjects with unilateral cochlear hearing loss, and two subjects with bilateral cochlear hearing loss were tested. The impaired ears had confirmed reductions in frequency selectivity at 1 kHz. For the normal ears, the psychometric functions were nonmonotonic, showing minima for gap durations corresponding to integer multiples of the signal period (n ms, where n is a positive integer) and maxima for durations corresponding to (n-0.5) ms. F•or the impaired ears, the psychometric functions showed only small (nonsignificant) nonmonotonicities. Performance overall was slightly worse for the impaired than for the normal ears. The main features of the results could be accounted for using a model consisting of a bandpass filter (the auditory filter), a square-law device, and a sliding temporal integrator. Consistent with the data, the model demonstrates that, although a broader auditory filter has a faster transient response, this does not necessarily lead to improved performance in a gap detection task. The model also indicates that gap thresholds do not provide a direct measure of temporal resolution, since they depend at least partly on intensity resolution.
Independence of frequency channels in auditory temporal gap detection
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2000
The ability of listeners to detect a temporal gap in a 1600-Hz-wide noiseband ͑target͒ was studied as a function of the absence and presence of concurrent stimulation by a second 1600-Hz-wide noiseband ͑distractor͒ with a nonoverlapping spectrum. Gap detection thresholds for single noisebands centered on 1.0, 2.0, 4.0, and 5.0 kHz were in the range from 4 to 6 ms, and were comparable to those described in previous studies. Gap thresholds for the same target noisebands were only modestly improved by the presence of a synchronously gated gap in a second frequency band. Gap thresholds were unaffected by the presence of a continuous distractor that was either proximate or remote from the target frequency band. Gap thresholds for the target noiseband were elevated if the distractor noiseband also contained a gap which ''roved'' in time in temporal proximity to the target gap. This effect was most marked in inexperienced listeners. Between-channel gap thresholds, obtained using leading and trailing markers that differed in frequency, were high in all listeners, again consistent with previous findings. The data are discussed in terms of the levels of the auditory perceptual processing stream at which the listener can voluntarily access auditory events in distinct frequency channels.
The detection of a temporal gap between two disparate stimuli
Perception & Psychophysics, 1974
When a temporal gap is bounded by a light and a tone, gap detection performance as a function of gap duration is well described by a simple model which characterizes the discrimination as a purely temporal one. When the gap is bounded by two tones, performance is superior and seems to depend on the frequency difference between the tones, but is not well described by the same model. It is suggested that the light-tone performance represents the operation of a central temporal discrimination mechanism, while the tone-tone cases represent the use by Os of nontemporal cues originating in the peripheral auditory system.
Minimum stimulus levels for temporal gap resolution in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1987
The minimum sensation levels required for optimal temporal gap resolution were measured in five listeners with moderately severe degrees of sensorineural hearing loss. The stimuli were three continuous octave-band noises centered at 0.5, 2.0, and 4.0 kHz. Subjects used a B•k•sy tracking procedure to determine the minimum signal levels needed to resolve periodic temporal gaps of fixed durations. Analysis of data across subjects and signal revealed only a weak correlation between this minimum SL and the corresponding HLs; most listeners resolved threshold gaps at minimum levels of 25-35 dB SL, independent of degree of hearing loss. The results differ from those of normal subjects with masking-induced hearing loss [Fitzgibbons, Percept. Psychophys. 35, 446-450 (1984) ], which showed an inverse relationship between HL and the SLs required for gap threshold. The findings indicate that assessment of optimal gap resolution in listeners with cochlear impairment requires stimulus presentation levels of at least 25-35 dB SL. Even with sufficient stimulus intensity, each of the hearing-impaired listeners exhibited abnormal gap resolution for each octave-band signal.
Temporal gap resolution in listeners with high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1987
Temporal gap resolution was measured in five normal-hearing listeners and five cochlearimpaired listeners, whose sensitivity losses were restricted to the frequency regions above 1000 Hz. The stimuli included a broadband noise and three octave band noises centered at 0.5, 1.0, and 4.0 kHz. Results for the normal-hearing subjects agree with previous findings and reveal that gap resolution improves progressively with an increase in signal frequency. Gap resolution in the impaired listeners was significantly poorer than normal for all signals including those that stimulated frequency regions with normal pure-tone sensitivity. Smallest gap thresholds for the impaired listeners were observed with the broadband signal at high levels. This result agrees with data from other experiments and confirms the importance of high-frequency signal audibility in gap detection. The octave band data reveal that resolution deficits can be quite large within restricted frequency regions, even those with minimal sensitivity loss.
Ear and contralateral masker effects on auditory temporal gap detection thresholds
Hearing research, 2008
A temporal processing advantage is thought to underlie the left hemisphere dominance for language. One measure of a temporal processing advantage is temporal acuity or resolution. A standard paradigm for measuring auditory temporal resolution is gap detection in its ''within-channel" and ''between-channel" forms. Previous experiments investigating a right ear advantage for within-channel gap detection have yielded conflicting results, and between-channel gap detection has not previously been studied for ear differences. In the present study, the two types of gap detection task were employed, under each of three contralateral masking conditions (no noise, continuous noise and interrupted noise). An adaptive tracking procedure was used to measure the minimal detectable gap at each ear (and therefore, the temporal acuity of the contralateral hemisphere). A significant effect of masking noise was observed in both of the gap detection tasks. Within-channel gap threshold durations were longer in the interrupted noise condition for both ears. Between-channel gap threshold durations were shorter in the interrupted noise condition at the left ear, with a trend in the same direction at the right ear. The study found no significant difference between the ears in thresholds in either gap detection task in any of the masking conditions. This suggests that if the left cerebral hemisphere has a temporal processing advantage, then it is not in the form of acuity for temporal gap detection.
Purpose: Gap detection and the temporal modulation transfer function (TMTF) are 2 common methods to obtain behavioral estimates of auditory temporal acuity. However, the agreement between the 2 measures is not clear. This study compares results from these 2 methods and their dependencies on listener age and hearing status. Method: Gap detection thresholds and the parameters that describe the TMTF (sensitivity and cutoff frequency) were estimated for young and older listeners who were naive to the experimental tasks. Stimuli were 800-Hz-wide noises with upper frequency limits of 2400 Hz, presented at 85 dB SPL. A 2-track procedure (Shen & Richards, 2013) was used for the efficient estimation of the TMTF. Results: No significant correlation was found between gap detection threshold and the sensitivity or the cutoff frequency of the TMTF. No significant effect of age and hearing loss on either the gap detection threshold or the TMTF cutoff frequency was found, while the TMTF sensitivity improved with increasing hearing threshold and worsened with increasing age. Conclusion: Estimates of temporal acuity using gap detection and TMTF paradigms do not seem to provide a consistent description of the effects of listener age and hearing status on temporal envelope processing.
Human Auditory Brainstem Response to Temporal Gaps in Noise
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 2001
Gap detection is a commonly used measure of temporal resolution, although the mechanisms underlying gap detection are not well understood. To the extent that gap detection depends on processes within, or peripheral to, the auditory brainstem, one would predict that a measure of gap threshold based on the auditory brainstem response (ABR) would be similar to the psychophysical gap detection threshold. Three experiments were performed to examine the relationship between ABR gap threshold and gap detection. Thresholds for gaps in a broadband noise were measured in young adults with normal hearing, using both psychophysical techniques and electrophysiological techniques that use the ABR. The mean gap thresholds obtained with the two methods were very similar, although ABR gap thresholds tended to be lower than psychophysical gap thresholds. There was a modest correlation between psychophysical and ABR gap thresholds across participants.