The Academic Profession in Hong Kong: Maintaining Global Engagement in the Face of National Integration (original) (raw)
Related papers
THE CHANGING ACADEMIC PROFESSION IN INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE PERSPECTIVES（Report of the International Conference on the Changing Academic Profession Project, 2008）, 2008
This paper contains a preliminary look at the 2007 data from the Hong Kong CAP study. It includes basic information about the sample and methodology, as well as a review of selected data about the profile of academic staff and their views about working conditions, management and internationalism. The paper also makes reference to selected data gathered in 1993 and 1999. Finally, the paper provides a brief summary and some thoughts about possible directions for future research on Hong Kong’s changing academic profession.
Into an era of autonomy for universities in Hong Kong
Higher Education Policy, 1996
Universities in Hong Kong are publicly funded and have been under close scrutiny by the Funding Council. Due to Hong Kong's colonial status, its purpose for higher education has been fulfiling the demand of labour force in order to ensure smooth economic growth in the territory. As 1997 is approaching, the shift of sovereignty to China will inevitably cause changes in terms of the direction or even possibly the philosophy of higher education in Hong Kong. The UGC (previously called UPGC) in their most recent Interim Report of Higher Education 1991-2001 advocates the missions for its funded institutions and encourages them to have self-initiation in determining their strategic positioning and planning in order to develop their own areas of excellence. The funding council endows this autonomy to institutions by means of their funding mechanism. This article will examine Hong Kong situation from a historical context into the future prospect.
Higher Education Restructuring and Academic Freedom in Hong Kong
Policy Futures in Education, 2008
A former British colony, Hong Kong was reunited with the People's Republic of China in 1997 under the 'one country two systems' model. The Hong Kong Basic Law contains detailed provisions for academic freedom, ensuring that local academics enjoy far greater freedom than their counterparts in mainland China. Hong Kong academics and the broader community have also publicly supported academic freedom when they perceived it to be under threat. The authors argue, however, that the recent restructuring of Hong Kong's universities may ultimately pose a greater threat than any explicit interference from the local or national governments.
[co-authored with William Yat Wai Lo] This paper examines the significance of global trends in higher education development in Hong Kong between 1997 and 2012. Two trends, namely massification and internationalisation, are considered to be the key driving forces that have shaped Hong Kong’s higher education policy during the period. The former refers to government measures to widen participation in higher education; the later is associated with the strategy of developing Hong Kong into a regional education hub. In these contexts of massification and internationalisation, higher education institutions in the city have reviewed and revised their governance structure. The paper begins with an explanation of why the ideas of massification and internationalisation have entered the policy discourse of higher education in Hong Kong in the late 1990s. Then, it reviews the ways in which the two trends have been materialised by neoliberal policies and practices in the 2000s. By examining the development of the non-publicly funded arms of the University of Hong Kong Group, this paper reveals how the two global trends have influenced university governance in Hong Kong. Based on this review, this paper argues that the development of higher education in the city can be seen an extension of structural transformation of the Hong Kong economy, which is tied in with the global economic environment that supports academic capitalism.
A Preliminary Review of the Hong Kong Changing Academic Profession Data
This paper contains a preliminary look at the 2007 data from the Hong Kong CAP study. It includes basic information about the sample and methodology, as well as a review of selected data about the profile of academic staff and their views about working conditions, management and internationalism. The paper also makes reference to selected data gathered in 1993 and 1999. Finally, the paper provides a brief summary and some thoughts about possible directions for future research on Hong Kong's changing academic profession. Survey Methods The Hong Kong CAP 2007 data were collected through a paper survey. The questionnaire, consisting of 53 questions in 6 sections, was designed based on the one developed by the international CAP team and modified by the Hong Kong CAP team. The survey work was contracted to the Social Sciences Research Centre (SSRC) of the University of Hong Kong. A pilot survey was conducted in May 2007, after which selected questions were modified based on the results of the pilot. Staff lists were acquired for each institution and a senior academic at each institution was invited to become a Hong Kong CAP affiliate. The role of the affiliate was to encourage academic staff at their institutions to participate in the survey. This was accomplished mainly by sending follow-up reminders. The Hong Kong CAP principal investigator wrote an article for the
Erikson, Vygotsky, and Illeris: Implications/Challenges of Hong Kong’s University Reforms
General Education and University Curriculum Reform: An International Conference in Hong Kong Conference Proceedings, pp. 83-87, 2012
This article provides a framework for understanding students in Hong Kong’s new 3-3-4 education system, and argues that under the right conditions will see Hong Kong universities develop their expertise to support students’ development.
The Changing Academic Profession in Hong Kong
Springer eBooks, 2017
The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.
Hong Kong’s Cross-System University Partnerships
Routledge eBooks, 2019
The authors examine the special case of Hong Kong higher education's institutional partnerships in the Chinese mainland. After noting the rise of cross-system university partnership in Asia, it provides a neoinstitutional perspective on the differences between the two China higher education systems. Finally, a case study of the experience of the longest-running Hong Kong campus partnership on the Chinese mainland is discussed and analyzed. Results show that while adaptations are required to sustain the partnership, the degree of autonomy has grown over time.