Hypothetical bias in dichotomous choice contingent valuation studies (original) (raw)
A Meta-analysis of Hypothetical Bias in Stated Preference Valuation
Darryl Weatherhead, Thomas Stevens
Environmental & Resource Economics, 2005
View PDFchevron_right
Personal versus societal preferences in contingent valuation assessments
Stephen Hynes
2010
View PDFchevron_right
Is hypothetical bias universal? Validating contingent valuation responses using a binding public referendum
Robert Johnston
Journal of Environmental Economics and Management - J ENVIRON ECON MANAGE, 2006
View PDFchevron_right
Meta-Analysis of the Probability of Disparity between Actual and Hypothetical Valuation Responses: Extension and Preliminary New Results
Robert Berrens
View PDFchevron_right
Elicitation Format and Part-Whole Bias: Do Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Surveys and Stated Preference Experiments Give the Same Results?
Vivien Foster
1998
View PDFchevron_right
Survey Response-Related Biases in Contingent Valuation: Concepts, Remedies, and Empirical Application to Valuing Aquatic Plant Management
John Bergstrom
American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2000
View PDFchevron_right
On the Interpretation of Responses to Contingent Valuation Surveys
Glenn Harrison, Bengt Kriström
2000
View PDFchevron_right
The citizen versus consumer distinction: An exploration of individuals' preferences in Contingent Valuation studies
Stephen Hynes
Ecological Economics, 2010
View PDFchevron_right
Contingent Valuation and Revealed Preference Methodologies: Comparing the Estimates for Quasi-Public Goods
Richard Carson
1996
View PDFchevron_right
The accuracy, applicability and transferability of contingent valuation measures for nonmarket goods
Robert Berrens
1993
View PDFchevron_right
SURVEY RESPONSE-RELATED BIASES IN Co TINGENT VALUATION: C ONCEPTS, R EMEDIES, ND EMPIRICAL APPLICATION TO VALUING AQUATIC PLANT MANAGEMENT
John Bergstrom
Amer J Agr Econ, 2000
View PDFchevron_right
A general model of starting point bias in double-bounded dichotomous contingent valuation surveys
Daigee Shaw
Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2005
View PDFchevron_right
Assessing Perceived Consequentiality: Evidence from a Contingent Valuation Survey on Global Climate Change
Robert Berrens, Mani Nepal, PhD
View PDFchevron_right
Comparing Models for Contingent Valuation Surveys: Statistical Efficiency and the Precision of Benefit Estimates
John Loomis
Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 1992
View PDFchevron_right
Willingness to pay or intention to pay: The attitude-behavior relationship in contingent valuation
Jane Luzar
The Journal of Socio-Economics, 1998
View PDFchevron_right
Elicitation and truncation effects in contingent valuation studies
Geoffrey Kerr, Guy Garrod
Ecological Economics, 1995
View PDFchevron_right
Convergent validity in contingent valuation: an application to the willingness to pay for national climate change mitigation targets in Germany
Reinhard Uehleke
Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 2016
View PDFchevron_right
Referendum Design and Contingent Valuation: TheNOAA Panel's No-Vote Recommendation
Richard Carson
1995
View PDFchevron_right
Cost credibility and the stated preference analysis of public goods
Aaron Strong
Resource and Energy Economics, 2007
View PDFchevron_right
Contingent Valuation: Controversies and Evidence
Shud Kamaruzzaman
2001
View PDFchevron_right
Bias and efficiency of single versus double bound models for contingent valuation studies: a Monte Carlo analysis
Pinuccia Calia
Applied Economics, 2000
View PDFchevron_right
Construct validity of dichotomous and polychotomous choice contingent valuation questions
Richard C Ready
1998
View PDFchevron_right
Willingness to pay: referendum contingent valuation and uncertain project benefits
Charles Roncin
IDB Publications, 1999
View PDFchevron_right
Contingent valuation and the value of public goods: Reply
Jack Knetsch
Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1992
View PDFchevron_right
Do Reminders of Substitutes and Budget Constraints Influence Contingent Valuation Estimates? Reply
Glenn Blomquist
Land Economics, 1995
View PDFchevron_right
Testing for Hypothetical Bias in a Choice Experiment Using a Local Public Good: Riparian Forest Restoration
Robert Berrens
View PDFchevron_right
Sources of Hypothetical Bias in Public Goods Experiments: A Disaggregated Approach
Stephen Swallow
2013
View PDFchevron_right
Trichotomous Choice: A Possible Solution to Dual Response Objectives in Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Questions
John Loomis
1999
View PDFchevron_right
Implications of bid design and willingness-to-pay distribution for starting point bias in double-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation surveys
Joseph Cooper
2011
View PDFchevron_right
2004. “Explaining Disparities between Actual and Hypothetical Stated Values: Further Investigation Using Meta-Analysis.” Economics Bulletin
Robert Berrens
2014
View PDFchevron_right