Outcomes of induction of labour in women with previous caesarean delivery: a retrospective cohort study using a population database (original) (raw)
Rate of spontaneous onset of labour before planned repeat caesarean section at term
Michael Nicholl
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 2014
View PDFchevron_right
Selected maternal morbidities in women with a prior caesarean delivery planning vaginal birth or elective repeat caesarean section: a retrospective cohort analysis using data from the UK Obstetric Surveillance System
Manisha Nair
BMJ open, 2015
View PDFchevron_right
Is it worth inducing labour in women with a previous caesarean delivery?
Ahmed Nooh
Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 2012
View PDFchevron_right
Trial of labour after caesarean section and the risk of neonatal and infant death: a nationwide cohort study
Patricia Kearney
BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2017
View PDFchevron_right
Vaginal birth after caesarean section versus elective repeat caesarean section: assess neonatal downstream outcomes too. BJOG. 2006;113(7):852-853.
Judy Slome Cohain
View PDFchevron_right
Indications for first caesarean and delivery mode in subsequent trial of labour
Karin Kallen
Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology, 2013
View PDFchevron_right
Pregnancy outcomes of induced labor in women with previous cesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Federico Prefumo
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2014
View PDFchevron_right
The Obstetrics Outcomes of Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Section in a Cohort with High Induction of Labor Rate
İrana Gorchiyeva
Journal of Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020
View PDFchevron_right
Outcomes of elective induction of labour compared with expectant management: population based study
Sarah Stock
BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2012
View PDFchevron_right
Risk of caesarean section after induced labour: do hospitals make a difference
Cristina Teixeira
View PDFchevron_right
Target populations to reduce cesarean rates after induced labor: A national population‐based cohort study
corinne dupont
Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 2019
View PDFchevron_right
Prenatal risk factors for Caesarean section. Analyses of the ALSPAC cohort of 12 944 women in England
Deirdre Murphy
International journal of epidemiology, 2005
View PDFchevron_right
multicentre prospective study benefits associated with caesarean delivery: Maternal and neonatal individual risks and
Eliette Valladares
2007
View PDFchevron_right
(Update of a) systematic review on the impact of elective early term (< 39th gestational week) caesarean sections on maternal and neonatal health - a protocol
Frank Louwen
Systematic reviews, 2018
View PDFchevron_right
Offering routine induction of labour at 39 weeks in low-risk nulliparous women: No need for hasty change
Sean Seeho
Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 2019
View PDFchevron_right
Understanding rising caesarean section trends: relevance of -inductions and prelabour obstetric interventions at term
A. Bonnaerens
Facts, views & vision in ObGyn, 2011
View PDFchevron_right
Elective induction for pregnancies at or beyond 41 weeks of gestation and its impact on stillbirths: a systematic review with meta-analysis
Arwa Hussain
BMC Public Health, 2011
View PDFchevron_right
Effects of induction of labor prior to post-term in low-risk pregnancies: a systematic review. JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports. Publish Ahead of Print
Eva Rydahl
2018
View PDFchevron_right
To compare the Fetomaternal outcome of natural birth versus induced birth after previous one caesarean section: A prospective Observational study
sarika gautam
SVU-International Journal of Medical Sciences
View PDFchevron_right
The outcomes of trial of labour after cesarean section following induction of labour compared to spontaneous labour
Ghadeer Al-shaikh
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2013
View PDFchevron_right
The impact of labor induction at 39 weeks gestation compared with expectant management on maternal and neonatal morbidity in low-risk women: A United States of America Cohort Study
Maria D Í A Z Soriano
2020
View PDFchevron_right
Induction of Labour for Post Term Pregnancy: An Observational Study
Dave Parry
Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 1998
View PDFchevron_right
Maternal and neonatal individual risks and benefits associated with caesarean delivery: multicentre prospective study
Jose Anibal Lopes
Bmj, 2007
View PDFchevron_right
A Comparative Study of the Risk of Adverse Outcomes in the Second Pregnancy after a First Caesarean Delivery Compared to a First Vaginal Delivery.
IOSR Journals
IOSR Journals , 2019
View PDFchevron_right
Caesarean section rates and adverse neonatal outcomes after induction of labour versus expectant management in women with an unripe cervix: a secondary analysis of the HYPITAT and DIGITAT trials
Corine Koopmans
Bjog: An International Journal Of Obstetrics And Gynaecology, 2016
View PDFchevron_right
Limiting the caesarean section rate in low risk pregnancies is key to lowering the trend of increased abdominal deliveries: an observational study
Hendrik Cammu
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 2012
View PDFchevron_right
Induction of labor versus expectant management for post-date pregnancy: Is there sufficient evidence for a change in clinical practice?
Hajo wildschut
Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 2009
View PDFchevron_right
The effects of induction of labor prior to post-term in low risk pregnanices: a systematic review
Eva Rydahl
2016
View PDFchevron_right