original ) (raw )Induction of labor with three different techniques at 41 weeks of gestation or spontaneous follow-up until 42 weeks in women with definitely unfavorable cervical scores
Serdar Dilbaz
European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 2005
View PDFchevron_right
Risk of caesarean section after induced labour: do hospitals make a difference
Cristina Teixeira
View PDFchevron_right
Outcomes of induction of labour in women with previous caesarean delivery: a retrospective cohort study using a population database
Sarah Stock
View PDFchevron_right
Cesarean Section Rates and Adverse Neonatal Outcomes After Induction of Labour Versus Expectant Management in Women With an Unripe Cervix: A Secondary Analysis of the HYPITAT and DIGITAT Trials
Corine Koopmans
Obstetric Anesthesia Digest, 2017
View PDFchevron_right
Impact of Indication for Labour Induction on Caesarean Section Delivery
Fortune Journals
View PDFchevron_right
Understanding rising caesarean section trends: relevance of -inductions and prelabour obstetric interventions at term
A. Bonnaerens
Facts, views & vision in ObGyn, 2011
View PDFchevron_right
Modified Bishop's score and induction of labor in patients with a previous cesarean delivery
Yoram Sorokin , Sean Blackwell
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2004
View PDFchevron_right
A Study of Maternal and Foetal Outcomes in Cases of Induction of Labour in a Tertiary Care Centre
Priyanka Phunde
2020
View PDFchevron_right
Induction of labour – a misused blessing: Prospective study of factors influencing the success of induction and comparison of fetomaternal outcomes with spontaneous labour
vinutha vinod
South African Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2021
View PDFchevron_right
Risk factors at caesarean section and failure of subsequent trial of labour
Otto Bleker
European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 2002
View PDFchevron_right
Induction of Labour; Comparison of Outcome of Planned Induction Versus Expectant Management in Gestational Hypertension Between 36 to 40 Weeks
Nadia Taj
THE PROFESSIONAL MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2017
View PDFchevron_right
Outcome of Induction of Labor: A Prospective Study
rupak bhattarai
Annals of International medical and Dental Research, 2016
View PDFchevron_right
An assessment of the caesarean section rate at Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital according to the Robson classification
Susan Branch
South African Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
View PDFchevron_right
Induction of labor versus expectant management for post-date pregnancy: Is there sufficient evidence for a change in clinical practice?
Hajo wildschut
Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 2009
View PDFchevron_right
High risk pregnancy outcome following induction of labour
Vasilios Tanos
European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 1997
View PDFchevron_right
Cesarean Section Rates and Adverse Neonatal Outcomes After Induction of Labour Versus Expectant Management in Women With an Unripe Cervix
Kim Boers
Obstetric Anesthesia Digest
View PDFchevron_right
Should cervical favourability play a role in the decision for labour induction in gestational hypertension or mild pre-eclampsia at term? An exploratory analysis of the HYPITAT trial
Henk Groen
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 2012
View PDFchevron_right
Induction of labor versus expectant management: Does it matter?
Mallory Woiski
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1995
View PDFchevron_right
Induction of labour versus expectant management in women with preterm prelabour rupture of membranes between 34 and 37 weeks (the PPROMEXIL-trial)
Mallory Woiski
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 2007
View PDFchevron_right
Prenatal risk factors for Caesarean section. Analyses of the ALSPAC cohort of 12 944 women in England
Deirdre Murphy
International journal of epidemiology, 2005
View PDFchevron_right
Indications for first caesarean and delivery mode in subsequent trial of labour
Karin Kallen
Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology, 2013
View PDFchevron_right
Predictors of newborn admission after labour induction at term: Bishop score, pre-induction ultrasonography and clinical risk factors
Jamiyah Hassan
Singapore medical journal
View PDFchevron_right
Caesarean Section -Incidence, Indications and Outcome at Tertiary Care Hospital
Vidyadhar Bangal
2019
View PDFchevron_right
Recommendations of the Polish Society of Gynecologists and Obstetricians regarding caesarean sections
Krzysztof Czajkowski
Ginekologia Polska, 2018
View PDFchevron_right
Reducing the rate of primary caesarean sections--an audit
Saqib Javed
2008
View PDFchevron_right
Labor induction in women with an unfavorable Bishop score: Randomized controlled trial of intrauterine Foley catheter with concurrent oxytocin infusion versus Foley catheter with extra-amniotic saline infusion with concurrent oxytocin infusion
Ro Jones
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2004
View PDFchevron_right
Induction of Labor and Risk for Emergency Cesarean Section in Women at Term Pregnancy
sandhya rajan
Journal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2019
View PDFchevron_right
To compare the Fetomaternal outcome of natural birth versus induced birth after previous one caesarean section: A prospective Observational study
sarika gautam
SVU-International Journal of Medical Sciences
View PDFchevron_right
Perinatal and Maternal Outcome Associated With Induction of Labour
Ali sher Awan
Hospital
View PDFchevron_right
Preterm induction of labor: predictors of vaginal delivery and labor curves
Jim C Huang
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2015
View PDFchevron_right
Factors associated with successful induction of labor
Amela Fayed
Saudi Medical Journal, 2012
View PDFchevron_right
Unsucessful labour induction in women with unfavourable cervical scores: predictors and management
Berna Dilbaz
The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2004
View PDFchevron_right