The nature of co-authorship: a note on recognition sharing and scientific argumentation (original) (raw)
Scientific authorshipPart 2. History, recurring issues, practices, and guidelines
Larry D Claxton
Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research, 2005
View PDFchevron_right
THE UTILITY OF SCIENTIFIC PAPERS
Jean-Louis Sikorav
View PDFchevron_right
Editorial: Reply to the Letter to the Editor'Scientific collaboration and quality of scientific research
Alireza Noruzi
2009
View PDFchevron_right
The case of equal co-authorship in scientific publications
Mohammad Hosseini
View PDFchevron_right
Scientists Are People Too: Comment on Andersen
Margaret Gilbert
Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective , 2017
View PDFchevron_right
Editorial: Synthesis and Analysis, Interdisciplinarity and Foundations
Diederik Aerts
1998
View PDFchevron_right
Publish (in a group) or perish (alone): the trend from single- to multi-authorship in biological papers
Helida Cunha
View PDFchevron_right
The International Scientific Session
maria cernat
View PDFchevron_right
The Results and Discussion an A Scientific Article: A Vision on its Structural Organization, Short Communication
wilfredo molina
2022
View PDFchevron_right
A scientometrics law about co-authors and their ranking. The co-author core
Marcel Ausloos
2012
View PDFchevron_right
A Role for Judgment Aggregation in Coauthoring Scientific Papers
Haixin Dang, Liam Kofi Bright, Remco Heesen
Erkenntnis, 2017
View PDFchevron_right
INTRODUCTION Special Guest-Edited Issue on Scientific Collaboration
Wesley Shrum
View PDFchevron_right
Scientists making a difference, editors not so much
Saray Ayala
Metascience, 2018
View PDFchevron_right
Understanding the role of open peer review and dynamic academic articles: Authors' reply to Problems with natural selection of academic papers
Varvara Trachana
Scientometrics, 2011
View PDFchevron_right
Liberman_Wolf_(2013). Scientific Communication in the Process to Coauthorship
Sofia Liberman
Feist, G. J., and Gorman, M., (editors). Handbook of the Psychology of Science. Springer Publishing Co. ISBN-13: 978-0-8261-0624-7, 123-147.
View PDFchevron_right
Induzione e corroborabilità: valutazioni frequentistiche delle teorie scientifiche
Giovanni Iorio Giannoli
Epistemologia, 1990
View PDFchevron_right
Only Human: Scientists, Systems, and Suspect Statistics
Lucia Magis-Weinberg, Eryk Walczak, Matthew Jones
View PDFchevron_right
The “Mendel syndrome” in science: durability of scientific literature and its effects on bibliometric analysis of individual scientists
Rodrigo Costas
2011
View PDFchevron_right
Correction for Coccia and Wang, Evolution and convergence of the patterns of international scientific collaboration
Mario Coccia
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
View PDFchevron_right
The Science of Science. By Dashun Wang and Albert-László Barabási. Cambridge University Press, 2021. Pp. 308. Hardback price GBP 64.99, ISBN 9781108492669. Paperback price GBP 22.99, ISBN 9781108716956
John R Helliwell
Journal of Applied Crystallography, 2021
View PDFchevron_right
Disagreement in science: introduction to the special issue
Finnur Dellsén
Synthese
View PDFchevron_right
A Few Critical Comments to the Paper by Marek Loužek: The Economic Approach to Science
Jan Ámos Víšek
Prague Economic Papers
View PDFchevron_right
Peer Review Comments on Seeds of Science articles (2021-2022)
Ted Wade
Seeds of science, 2022
View PDFchevron_right
research-article2013 PUS0010.1177/0963662513515371Public Understanding of ScienceVincent Article
bernadette bensaude vincent
View PDFchevron_right
Approaching the “reward triangle”: General analysis of the presence of funding acknowledgments and “peer interactive communication” in scientific publications
Rodrigo Costas
2012
View PDFchevron_right
Credibility, peer review, and Nature, 1939-1990
Melinda Baldwin
View PDFchevron_right
Allocating Credit and Blame in Science
Daryl Chubin
Science, Technology, & Human Values, 1988
View PDFchevron_right
The Crisis in Scientific Publishing and its Effect on the Admissibility of Technical and Scientific Evidence, 49 J. Marshall L. Rev. 727 (2016)
Kevin Hill
The John Marshall law review, 2016
View PDFchevron_right
The computational and confirmational differences between the social and the physical sciences
Ronald Laymon
Philosophia, 1993
View PDFchevron_right
Percentage-based Author Contribution Index: a universal measure of author contribution to scientific articles
Jason Schmidt
Research integrity and peer review, 2017
View PDFchevron_right
Epistemic Vigilance and Epistemic Responsibility in the Liquid World of Scientific Publications
Gloria ORIGGI
View PDFchevron_right
For I dipped into the future. The internet and other developments are reshaping the way science is communicated, transforming the traditional scientific article to become more interactive and more useful
Andrea C. Rinaldi
EMBO reports, 2010
View PDFchevron_right
PHILOSOPHY AND THE PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE PLUS 2 PAPERS ON SCIENTIFIC REALISM FOR BALANCE
HARRIS ( K O N S T A N T I N O S ) NOTTAS, CO AUTHORS DTMS ET AL D T M S AS WELL AS MANY OTHER ANAGRAMS
THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION TO PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 2008
View PDFchevron_right
Peer review versus editorial review and their role in innovative science
jarl flensmark
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 2012
View PDFchevron_right