Perceptions of safety at work: A framework for linking safety climate to safety performance, knowledge, and motivation (original) (raw)
Related papers
Effect of safety climate on safety behavior in employees: The mediation of safety motivation
Psikohumaniora: Jurnal Penelitian Psikologi
The number of work accidents in production employees is high. One reason is the lack of compliance of employees with workplace safety rules. The necessary aspects that can improve workplace safety are safety climate and safety motivation. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of safety climate on safety behavior both directly and indirectly mediated by safety motivation. Three scales were used in this study, namely the safety behavior scale, the safety climate scale, and the safety motivation scale. The Cronbach’s Alpha coefficients were 0.898, 0.922, and 0.896. The respondents were 78 employees in the production, processing, and quality assurance section. Data were analyzed using regression analysis. The result showed the direct effect (β = 0.272) and the indirect effect of safety climate on safety behavior (β = 0.281). The effect of climate safety on safety behavior was partially mediated by safety motivation.
The impact of organizational climate on safety climate and individual behavior
Safety Science, 2000
Relatively little previous research has investigated the meechanisms by which safety climate aects safety behavior. The current study examined the eects of general organizational climate on safety climate and safety performance. As expected, general organizational climate exerted a signi®cant impact on safety climate, and safety climate in turn was related to selfreports of compliance with safety regulations and procedures as well as participation in safety-related activities within the workplace. The eect of general organizational climate on safety performance was mediated by safety climate, while the eect of safety climate on safety performance was partially mediated by safety knowledge and motivation. # Safety Science 34 www.elsevier.com/locate/ssci 0925-7535/00/$ -see front matter # 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved. P I I : S 0 9 2 5 -7 5 3 5 ( 0 0 ) 0 0 0 0 8 -4
Safety Climate and Safety Behaviour
Australian Journal of Management, 2002
This paper provides an overview of a research program examining the antecedents and consequences of safety climate and safety behaviour. A model is presented identifying the linkages between safety climate, safety knowledge, safety motivation, and safety behaviour. Findings from a series of studies are reviewed that support the hypothesized linkages between safety climate and safety behaviour. Longitudinal analyses have examined the role of additional factors, such as general organisational climate, supportive leadership and conscientiousness as sources of stability and change in safety climate and safety behaviour. Further developments of the model, aimed at integrating safety behaviour into broader models of work effectiveness, are also discussed.
A Research on The Effect of Organizational Safety Climate Upon The Safe Behaviors
This study aims to investigate the relationship between the organizational safety climate and the safety behaviors of the employees. It is been accepted by many researchers that unsafe employee behavior at work place is one of the primary determinants of occupational accidents. More recently researchers suggest that safe/unsafe behaviors of the employees are affected by certain organizational factors. Recent studies accept organizational safety climate as one these factors that affects safe/unsafe behaviors of the employees. In this context, this study conducted in an active shipyard in Turkey, finds that there are significant relations between the four dimensions of the organizational safety climate and the safety behavior of the employees.
This study presented a model specifying the relationship of unit-level safety climate and perceived colleagues’ safety knowledge/behavior (PCSK/B) to safety behavior (safety compliance and safety participation), as well as safety performance (injuries and near misses). PCSK/B, a measure of descriptive norms, was taken as a new individual-level predictor. Hierarchical linear modeling analyses indicated the significant cross-level interaction effects of unit-level safety climate and PCSK/B on safety behavior, i.e., the more positive the safety climate, the stronger effects PCSK/B has on safety behavior. The effect of PCSK/B on injuries was mediated by safety behavior. Implications for management and safety climate research were discussed.
Measuring Safety Climate: The role of Safety Policy and Working Condition
Purpose – The purpose of the paper is to delve in the effect of organizational safety programs/policies on the physical environment. Additionally, the gap analysis measured will be served for future plans and organizational intervention programs. Design/methodology/approach – Two measures has been utilized in this current research. Work Safety Scale (WSS) by Hayes et al. (1998), and Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire (MSQ) as proposed by Weiss et al. (1977). The measures were on the safety perceptions (safety programs) and the employees‟ satisfaction on their work environment. Findings – The analysis confirms that safety perceptions (Safety Policy) substantiate the relationship with employees‟ satisfaction on the physical environment. Originality/value – The automotive industry needs to understand their safety policies along with working conditions as they are critical to the mitigation and prevention of injury, accident occurrences and even reaps for a better productivity and efficiency.
Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 2010
Meta-analytic path analysis was utilised to test an integrative model linking perceived safety climate to hypothesized organisational antecedents and individual outcomes. Psychological climate, especially the perception of organisational attributes, was found to be significantly associated with safety climate (both constructs measured at the individual level). A partial mediation model was supported. Within this model, the relationship between safety climate and safety behaviour was partially mediated by work-related attitudes (organisational commitment and job satisfaction), and the relationship between safety climate and occupational accidents was partially mediated by both safety behaviour and general health. Safety climate acted as a partial mediator in the relationship between psychological climate and safety behaviour, with direct effects from climate perceptions relating to the leader and organisational processes. Avenues for further research and practical implications are discussed.