Prosthesis survival after total hip arthroplasty—does surgical approach matter? Analysis of 19,304 Charnley and 6,002 Exeter primary total hip arthroplasties reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register (original) (raw)

The type of surgical approach influences the risk of revision in total hip arthroplasty

Göran Garellick, Viktor Lindgren, Johan Kärrholm

Acta Orthopaedica, 2012

View PDFchevron_right

Total hip arthroplasties: What are the reasons for revision

James Stiehl

International Orthopaedics, 2008

View PDFchevron_right

The effect of surgical approach on early complications of total hip arthroplasty

Richard Steiger

Arthroplasty, 2019

View PDFchevron_right

Does Surgical Approach Influence the Natural History of the Unstable Total Hip Arthroplasty?

Cheryl Kreviazuk

The Journal of Arthroplasty, 2021

View PDFchevron_right

The effect of surgical approach on early complications of total hip arthoplasty

Camdon Fary

Arthroplasty

View PDFchevron_right

Survivorship analysis of 1,041 charnley total hip arthroplasties

Richard Balderston

The Journal of Arthroplasty, 1990

View PDFchevron_right

Prospective Randomized Study of Two Surgical Approaches for Total Hip Arthroplasty

Camilo Restrepo

The Journal of Arthroplasty, 2010

View PDFchevron_right

Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty

Cecil Rorabeck

2001

View PDFchevron_right

Comparison of clinical characteristics and 10-year survival rates of revision hip arthroplasties among revision time groups

ahmet sevencan

Archives of Medical Science

View PDFchevron_right

Validation of data in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register and the Norwegian Patient Register : 5,134 primary total hip arthroplasties and revisions operated at a single hospital between 1987 and 2003

Ove Furnes, Jon Arne Søreide

Acta Orthopaedica, 2005

View PDFchevron_right

The charnley versus the spectron hip prosthesis: Clinical evaluation of a randomized, prospective study of 2 different hip implants

Göran Garellick

1999

View PDFchevron_right

Outcome after total hip arthroplasty: Part II. Disease-specific follow-up and the Swedish National Total Hip Arthroplasty Register

Henrik Malchau

Acta Orthopaedica, 2001

View PDFchevron_right

Outcome of 881 total hip arthroplasties in 747 patients 21 years or younger: data from the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA) 1995–2016

Anne Marie Fenstad

Acta Orthopaedica

View PDFchevron_right

Total hip arthroplasties in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (LROI) and the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA): comparison of patient and procedure characteristics in 475,685 cases

Ola Rolfson

Acta Orthopaedica, 2020

View PDFchevron_right

To study the clinical outcome of total hip Arthroplasty

IP Innovative Publication Pvt. Ltd., Sohael M Khan

IP Innovative Publication Pvt. Ltd., 2017

View PDFchevron_right

Outcomes following total hip arthroplasty: A review of the registry data

Vikas Khanduja

Indian Journal of Orthopaedics

View PDFchevron_right

A systematic review of empirical studies between 1966 and 2005 of patient outcomes of total hip arthroplasty and related factors: Systematic review of empirical studies

Tarja Suominen

J Clin Nurs, 2007

View PDFchevron_right

Trochanteric osteotomy in total hip arthroplasty

B. Higgins

The Journal of Arthroplasty, 1998

View PDFchevron_right

Factors affecting aseptic loosening of 4750 total hip arthroplasties: multivariate survival analysis

susanna stea

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 2007

View PDFchevron_right

Risk of further surgery on the same or opposite side and mortality after primary total hip arthroplasty: A multi-state analysis of 133,654 patients from the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register

Peter Cnudde

Acta Orthopaedica

View PDFchevron_right

Revision and complication rates in 654 Exeter total hip replacements, with a maximum follow-up of 20 years

Otto Robertsson

BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2003

View PDFchevron_right

Quality of outcome data in total hip arthroplasty: comparison of registry data and worldwide non-registry studies from 5 decades

Andrea Berghold

Hip international : the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy, 2015

View PDFchevron_right

Short term evaluation of total hip arthroplasty; our experience at tertiary care center

Usama saeed

JPMA. The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association, 2015

View PDFchevron_right

A systematic review and meta-analysis of complications following the posterior and lateral surgical approaches to total hip arthroplasty

James Berstock, Andrew Beswick

Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2015

View PDFchevron_right

Contemporary posterior surgical approach in total hip replacement: still more reoperations due to dislocation compared with direct lateral approach? An observational study of the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register including 156,979 hips

Ola Rolfson

Acta Orthopaedica

View PDFchevron_right

Surgical approach significantly affects the complication rates associated with total hip arthroplasty

Richard Iorio

The bone & joint journal, 2019

View PDFchevron_right

Risk Factors for Revision for Early Dislocation in Total Hip Arthroplasty

Sarah Whitehouse

The Journal of Arthroplasty, 2008

View PDFchevron_right

Does Surgical Approach Affect Total Hip Arthroplasty Dislocation Rates

Khaled Saleh

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2006

View PDFchevron_right

Association between fixation technique and revision risk in total hip arthroplasty patients younger than 55 years of age. Results from the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association

Johan Kärrholm

Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 2014

View PDFchevron_right

Improving planning and post-operative assessment for Total Hip Arthroplasty

Þröstur Pétursson

European Journal of Translational Myology, 2015

View PDFchevron_right

Efficacy of Revision Surgery for the Dislocating Total Hip Arthroplasty: Report From a Large Community Registry

Susan Mehle

Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, 2013

View PDFchevron_right