Peremptory Pragmatism: Religion and the Administration of the Batson Rule (original) (raw)

Performing Discretion or Performing Discrimination: An Analysis of Race and Ritual in Batson Decisions in Capital Jury Selection

Melynda Price

View PDFchevron_right

Illinois Courts Struggle to Evaluate Race-Neutral Explanations for Peremptory Challenges under Batson v. Kentucky, 22 J. Marshall L. Rev. 235 (1988)

Kevin Bry

The John Marshall Law Review, 1988

View PDFchevron_right

Identification of Circumstances Under Which Religion Affects Each Stage of the Trial Process

Julie Singer

View PDFchevron_right

Religious Reasoning and Due Process of the Law: Why Religious Citizens Have the Burden to Prove the Innocence of Their Reasoning in the Public Square

Shannon Holzer

Oxford Journal of Church and State

View PDFchevron_right

The effects of deliberations and religious identity on mock jurors’ verdicts

Morgan Green

Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 2011

View PDFchevron_right

Striking the Peremptory Challenge from Civil Litigation: Hey Batson, Stay Where You Belong

Ed Katz

Pace Law Review

View PDFchevron_right

Idleman, Scott C. (1993) "The Role of Religious Values in Judicial Decision Making," Indiana Law Journal: Vol. 68: Iss. 2, Article 3 (Spring 1993)

Scott Stafne

View PDFchevron_right

Two Concepts of Judicial Deference to Religious Claims

Chagai Schlesinger

BYU Law Review, forthcoming, 2024

View PDFchevron_right

Race-Conscious Jury Selection

Anna Offit

Ohio State Law Journal, 2021

View PDFchevron_right

The Regulation of Defendant’s Religious Identity in Court Decisions

Nandang Sutrisno S.H., M.H., LLM., Ph.D.

BESTUUR

View PDFchevron_right

The Case For Religious Values In Judicial Decision-Making

Wendell Griffen

Marquette Law Review, 1998

View PDFchevron_right

Racial Discrimination and Jury Selection

Peter Joy

Social Science Research Network, 2016

View PDFchevron_right

Arresting Batson: How Striking Jurors Based on Arrest Records Violates Batson

Vida Johnson

Yale Law & Policy Review, 2016

View PDFchevron_right

Realistic responses to the limitations of Batson v. Kentucky

shari diamond

Cornell JL and Pub. Pol'y., 1997

View PDFchevron_right

Two Concepts of Judicial Deference to Religious Claims by Chagai Sclesinger received by me from academis.edu

Scott Stafne

View PDFchevron_right

Looking at Religion in a Legal Context: Whether the court ruled correctly or not in Sedlock v. Baird

Megan Hollinger

Undergraduate Journal of Religious Studies, 2018

View PDFchevron_right

The Religious Dimension of Judicial Decision Making and the De Facto Disestablishment

Mark C. Modak-Truran

81 Marq. L. Rev. 255 (1998) , 1997

View PDFchevron_right

Justice for (W)all:Judicial Review and Religion

Patrick Hart

Queen's Law Journal 43:1 (2017), 2017

View PDFchevron_right

Judging Bias: Juror Confidence and Judicial Rulings on Challenges for Cause

FacComm Search, Mary Rose

Law & Society Review, 2008

View PDFchevron_right

The Gideons and the Gallows: Against the "Typical Juror" Standard in Capital Cases

Johnny Hutchinson

Case Western Reserve law review, 2007

View PDFchevron_right

Judicial Review and the Religion Clauses: A Response to Professor Greenwalt

Robert P. George

View PDFchevron_right

Searching for the Soul of Judicial Decisionmaking: An Empirical Study of Religious Freedom Decisions

Gregory Sisk, Andrew Morriss

Ohio State Law Journal, 2004

View PDFchevron_right

JUDICIALIDIOSYNCRASIESANDTHEPLACEOFRELIGIONINJUDICIALLAWMAKING.

CHRISTIAN WIGWE

BRITISH JOURNAL OF ADVANCE ACADEMIC RESEARCH, 2016

View PDFchevron_right

"Racial Exclusion and Death Penalty Juries"

Shyam Sriram

View PDFchevron_right

The Justiciability of Religious Freedom in US and EU Courts

Regina M . Paulose

View PDFchevron_right

Religion and the Public Defender

Sadiq Reza

1999

View PDFchevron_right

Reenchanting the Law: The Religious Dimension of Judicial Decision Making

Mark C. Modak-Truran

53 Cath. U. L. Rev. 709 (2004), 2003

View PDFchevron_right

The Supreme Court's Rhetorical Hostility: What Is Hostile to Religion under the Establishment Clause

Frank Ravitch

2021

View PDFchevron_right

Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. Smith: The Erosion of Religious Liberty

Paul Zilberfein

1992

View PDFchevron_right

Can We Calculate Fairness and Reasonableness? Determining What Satisfies the Fair Cross-Section Requirement of the Sixth Amendment

Colleen Fitzharris

Michigan Law Review, 2013

View PDFchevron_right

Juries, Social Norms, and Civil Justice

Jason Solomon

65 Alabama Law Review 1125 1203, 2014

View PDFchevron_right

Judges and Religious-Based Reasoning

David Blaikie

View PDFchevron_right

Judges and Religious-Based Reasoning: A Response to Ginn and Blaikie

Sarah Hamill

Constitutional Forum/Forum …, 2012

View PDFchevron_right

Religion and Personality in a Death Penalty Jury

Keith Clarke

View PDFchevron_right

The Supreme Court\u27s Rhetorical Hostility: What Is Hostile to Religion under the Establishment Clause

Frank Ravitch

2004

View PDFchevron_right