original ) (raw )Gatekeeper with a Gavel: A Survey on Judicial Management of Challenges to Expert Reliability and Their Relationship to Summary Judgment
Andrew Jurs
Mississippi Law Journal, 2014
View PDFchevron_right
Utilization of Rules 614 and 706 in Fact-Finding: A Recent Study of Midwest Judges
Andrew Jurs
Court Review, 2013
View PDFchevron_right
Court-Appointed Experts and Judicial Reluctance: A Proposal to Amend Rule 706 of the Federal Rules of Evidence
Tahirih Lee
Yale Law & Policy Review, 1988
View PDFchevron_right
The gatekeeper effect: The impact of judges' admissibility decisions on the persuasiveness of expert testimony
Michael Saks
Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2009
View PDFchevron_right
Asking the Gatekeepers: A National Survey of Judges on Judging Expert Evidence in a Post-Daubert World
Mara Merlino
Law and Human Behavior, 2001
View PDFchevron_right
Charting the influences on the judicial mind: an empirical study of judicial reasoning
Andrew Morriss
NYUL rev., 1998
View PDFchevron_right
Explaining the Tension Between the Supreme Court's Embrace of Validity as the Touchstone of Admissibility of Expert Testimony and Lower Courts’ (Seeming) Rejection of Same
Michael Saks
Episteme, 2008
View PDFchevron_right
Statutory Interpretation on the Bench: A Survey of Forty-Two Judges on the Federal Courts of Appeals
Abbe Gluck
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2018
View PDFchevron_right
Judicial Fact-Finding: Trial by Judge Alone in Serious Criminal Cases
Vicki Waye
Melbourne University Law Review, 2003
View PDFchevron_right
Applying statistics to the gatekeeping of expert evidence: Introducing the Structured Statistical Judgement (SSJ)
James Andretta
Behavioral Sciences & the Law
View PDFchevron_right
Judging, Expertise, and the Rule of Law
Chad Oldfather
View PDFchevron_right
Legal Evidence: Critical Questions and Admissibility Criteria of Expert Testimony in the American Legal System
Douglas Walton , David Godden
D. M. Godden and D. Walton, Ratio Juris, 19, 2006, 261-286.
View PDFchevron_right
The Biases of Experts: An Empirical Analysis of Expert Witness Challenges
Robson Crim
Manitoba Law Journal 42(4), 2019
View PDFchevron_right
Specialized Trial Courts: Concentrating Expertise on Fact
Arti Rai
Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2002
View PDFchevron_right
Daubert in the States: Diffusion of a New Approach to Expert Evidence in the Courts
Herbert Kritzer , Darryn Beckstrom
Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2007
View PDFchevron_right
Court Review: Volume 43, Issue 2 – Judges vs. Juries
Brian Bornstein
2006
View PDFchevron_right
Argument from expert opinion as legal evidence: Critical questions and admissibility criteria of expert testimony in the American legal system
Douglas Walton , David Godden
Godden, D. and Walton, D. (2006). Argument from expert opinion as legal evidence: Critical questions and admissibility criteria of expert testimony in the American legal system. Ratio Juris, 19, 261-286., 2006
View PDFchevron_right
Scientific Evidence and the Question of Judicial Capacity
John Wesley
Wm. & Mary L. Rev., 1983
View PDFchevron_right
The Behavior of Federal Judges: A Theoretical and Empirical Study of Rational Choice
William Landes
2013
View PDFchevron_right
Understanding the Federal Circuit: An Expert Community Approach
Laura Pedraza Farina
Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2015
View PDFchevron_right
From black robes to white lab coats: the ethical implications of a judge's sua sponte, ex parte acquisition of social and other scientific evidence during the decision- …
Matthew Bramfeld
St. John's Law Review, 2012
View PDFchevron_right
(2014), Review of 'The Behavior of Federal Judges: A Theoretical & Empirical Study of Rational Choice' by Epstein, Landes and Posner. The Modern Law Review, 77: 151–154.
Sebastián Castro Quiroz
View PDFchevron_right
SW 15: Judicial Decision-Making: Integrating Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives Book of Abstracts
Gustavo Cevolani
2019
View PDFchevron_right
Expertise and Judicial Opinion Assignment on the Courts of Appeals
Jonathan Nash
Social Science Research Network, 2012
View PDFchevron_right
Crafting Law on the U.S. Courts of Appeals: Does Diversity on the Bench Make a Difference?
Laura Moyer
View PDFchevron_right
Judges, Litigants, and the Design of Courts
Jeff Yates
Law & Society Review, 2012
View PDFchevron_right
How the Creation of Appellate Courts in England and the United States Limited Judicial Comment on Evidence to the Jury
Renee Lerner
SSRN Electronic Journal
View PDFchevron_right
Balancing Legal Process with Scientific Expertise: A Comparative Assessment of Expert Witness Methodology in Five Nations, and Suggestions for Reform of Post-Daubert U.S. Reliability Determinations
Andrew Jurs
Marquette Law Review, 2012
View PDFchevron_right
Court Review: Volume 41, Issue 3-4-Problem-Solving Courts: Do They Create Judicial Independence Problems or Opportunities or Both?
Mary McQueen
Court Review: The …, 2005
View PDFchevron_right
Et Tu, Plaintiffs? An Empirical Analysis of Daubert’s Effect on Plaintiffs, and Why Gatekeeping Standards Matter (a Lot
Scott DeVito , Andrew Jurs
Arkansas Law Review, 2013
View PDFchevron_right
Applying Lawyers' Expertise to Scientific Experts: Some Thoughts About Trial Court Analysis of the Prejudicial Effects of Admitting and Excluding Expert Scientific Testimony
James Doyle
William and Mary law review, 1984
View PDFchevron_right
The Value of Precedent: Appellate Briefs and Judicial Opinions in the U.S. Courts of Appeals
Laura Moyer
Justice System Journal, 2013
View PDFchevron_right
Evaluating Judges and Judicial Institutions: Reorienting the Perspective
David Levi
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2010
View PDFchevron_right
Legal and psychological bases of expert testimony: Surveys of the law and of jurors
Michael Saks
Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 1984
View PDFchevron_right
Exploring the Vitality of Stare Decisis in America: Debut Symposium Report for The Matthew Fogg Symposia on the Vitality of Stare Decisis in America
Zena D. Crenshaw-Logal
2012
View PDFchevron_right