“The Specter of an Expansionist China”: Kennedy Administration Assessments of Chinese Intentions in Vietnam (original) (raw)
Related papers
The American Factor: Sino-American Rapprochement and Chinese Attitudes to the Vietnam War, 1968–72
Cold War History, 2005
It is clear that any work dealing with the United States and China during the 1960 s and 1970 s must make reference to the Vietnam War, and likewise any work dealing with Chinese involvement in the Vietnam War cannot overlook China's burgeoning relationship with the United States. However, since the release of documents from the Nixon administration and the publication of recent Chinese-language scholarship, there has been no systematic study of the connection between these two political processes. This paper charts the impact of Sino-American rapprochement on Beijing's attitudes towards the Vietnam War, and to what extent it caused China to alter its Vietnam policy.
Strategy and Evolution of Vietnam's China Policy: A Changing Mixture of Pathways
Asian Survey, vol. 46, no. 6 (November/December 2006), 2006
This article examines Vietnam's strategy toward China since 1990. The study suggests that Vietnam's China policy has been informed by a changing mix of four different pathways, whose salience depends on the interplay of interest and balance of power among China, America, ASEAN, and Vietnam's two grand strategic camps and supreme leader.
Asian Journal of Comparative Politics, 2017
Since 1991, Vietnam has adopted a dual strategic position towards China: it sees China as an indispensable economic and security partner and simultaneously it seeks to hedge against China's possible territorial encroachment by gradually beefing up its military and cautiously forging strategic ties with other powers. The making of Vietnam's current China policy is predominantly shaped by the interplay of two constants (geography and history) and two variables (China's policy and changing big power relations). Among these factors, geography and history serve as the basis for understanding Vietnam's hedging policy visa -vis China and explain why thus far Hanoi remains very reluctant to enter an alliance to counter China's rise. While being firm on its independent policy, Vietnam has become more " flexible in strategy and tactics " in rebalancing itself from China's orbit towards the West's as the result of China's increased assertiveness in the South China Sea disputes.
China and USA in Vietnam's International Relations in the Region
Palarch' Journal of Archeology of Egypt / Egyptology , 2021
Despite being governed by one party, the Vietnam Communist Party (VCP, Party), there are many political options for national economic development and national security of Vietnam. But predominantly there are two opposing political camps within VCP. One represents pro-China orientation and the second represents pro-USA orientation as USA and China are the two biggest political and economic powerhouses in the world and that will remain for decades. Naturally, pro-USA and pro-China stance guarantee different interests for the VCP and the nation. The article will analyze the advantages and disadvantages in each of these political options and proposes solutions to keep the strategic balance between them for the purpose of internal stability and sustainable development.
Vietnam: riding the Chinese tide
The Pacific Review, 2017
Vietnam's perception of China is nuanced and complex, a mixture of challenge and opportunity. Given its geographic proximity and overwhelming power, China represents a permanent strategic challenge Vietnam cannot escape. However, the two countries are partners in the defence of socialist ideals and communist rule. These circumstances have clearly shaped Vietnam's China policy, which is a mixture of cooperation and struggle. Vietnam's strategy is not about confronting China directly but finding a way to live with and benefit from its power.
This article examines the dramatic shifts that Vietnam's foreign policy has undergone over time, from a country tightly allied with Socialist partners like China and the Soviet Union to one that has diversified its strategic partners and foresworn alliances in order to protect its strategic autonomy. Vietnam's adoption of Doi Moi or economic renovation led Vietnam to multilateralize and expand its economic and political partnerships in the quest for economic growth. Doi Moi's success has produced a transformation in state-society relations as the rise in civil society organizations has weakened the VCP's hegemonic grip on society and shifted the basis of regime legitimacy from nationalism and socialist ideology to performance legitimacy. As public opinion and elite factionalism play an increasing role in Vietnam foreign policy, managing Vietnam's external ties has become increasingly difficult. This article concludes that public opinion regarding relations with China has become so toxic that it poses a serious challenge to the political legitimacy of Vietnam's one-party regime should it fail to deter Chinese assertiveness in the South China Sea.
How regime legitimation influences Vietnam's strategy toward US-China strategic rivalry
International Journal of Asian Studies, 2022
Vietnam has tried to maintain a delicate balance between the United States and China by pursuing a hedging strategy. In a shifting strategic environment marked by structural uncertainty caused by the rise of China, weaker Southeast Asian states like Vietnam are projecting a non-alignment posture. However, this rational behavior is not the product of systemic factors alone but also certain domestic pol- itical dynamics. We argue that regime legitimation – how the Vietnam Communist Party seeks to generate and sustain internal and external legitimacy – weighs heavily on Vietnam’s strategy toward US–China competition. In particular, three legitimation strategies employed by the Vietnam Communist Party – per- formance-based legitimation, nationalism-based legitimation vis-à-vis China, and defensive legitimation vis-à-vis “hostile forces” – produce dynamics that ensure Hanoi does not get inadvertently pulled into the orbit of either Beijing or Washington. Theoretically, this article contributes to the literature on domes- tic determinants of foreign policy with a focus on regime legitimation. Empirically, we seek to supplement the discussion on the salience and relevance of domestic politics in informing Southeast Asian states’ stra- tegic calculation amid great-power competition.
Vietnam Edging Towards America
ISEAS Perspective , 2020
• Vietnam is caught geopolitically between the United States, the dominant power, and China, the emergent power. • Some observers argue that Vietnam can continue to maintain a balanced position between China and the United States, while others are concerned that Vietnam may become a victim of the rising tensions between the two great powers. • Vietnam can edge closer to the United States by adopting a US-Vietnam “soft alignment” framework where America provides more support for Vietnam’s defence and security needs. • The United States can win hearts and minds in Vietnam by accommodating Hanoi’s key concerns, i.e. no intervention in Vietnam’s domestic politics and no intention of changing Vietnam’s socialist model. • At the same time, Vietnam, as a middle-power, can invest more in promoting peace and stability in the region.
Roots of the Sino-Vietnamese Conflict
Monthly Review, 1982
In the course of the U.S. war of aggression against Vietnam, the people's resistance struggle was endowed with enormous symbolic value by sympathetic European and North American observers. Here was the quintessential expression of a just war of national liberation, of revolutionary heroism, and of the ethical superiority of socialism. China, also an Asian socialist country, was hailed in these same quarters as Vietnam's most steadfast supporter in its "hour of trial." Left intellectuals were thus caught off guard when, in February 1979, the conflict between these two erstwhile allies burst out into the open. Circumstances now compelled them to face squarely the fact that their understanding of Asian reality-however seductive-was devoid of analytic value. Moreover, they could no longer summarily (and contemptuously) dismiss the quasi-theorists of the "totalitarian" phenomenon;' On the one hand, the appearance .of Solzhenitsyn's Gulag and a number of left-inspired critiques This article was originally co-authored by Jean-Philippe Beja and published in the Dutch journal de Gids(voL 142, no. 9110, Winter 1979). The research was carried out in Paris during the summer of 1979 in close collaboration with Beja, who is a Research Associate in Chinese Studies at the Fondation Nationale de Sciences Politiques in Paris. An elaborated French version was presented at the I.S.S. Seminar on Vietnam, Indochina, and Southeast Asia into the 80s, held at The Hague, September 29-0ctober 3, 1980. This shortened version and the conclusions were revised by John Kleinen, who is a lecturer in Southeast Asian Studies at the