Age and valve size effect on the long-term durability of the Carpentier-Edwards aortic pericardial bioprosthesis (original) (raw)
Long-term outcomes of the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valve prosthesis in the aortic position: effect of patient age
Paolo Biglioli
The Journal of heart valve disease, 2004
View PDFchevron_right
Long-Term Results of the Carpentier-Edwards Supraannular Aortic Valve Prosthesis
Vito Ruggieri
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2012
View PDFchevron_right
Prosthesis size and long-term survival after aortic valve replacement
James D.
2010
View PDFchevron_right
St. Jude medical valve prosthesis: An analysis of long-term outcome and prognostic factors
Adam Somlai-Fischer
The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1997
View PDFchevron_right
Influence of valve prosthesis type on early mortality in patients undergoing valve surgery
Andre Fernandes
Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular, 2014
View PDFchevron_right
Real Structural Valve Deterioration of the Mitroflow Aortic Prosthesis: Competing Risk Analysis
Víctor Javier Ibáñez León
Revista espanola de cardiologia (English ed.), 2017
View PDFchevron_right
Ten-year comparison of pericardial tissue valves versus mechanical prostheses for aortic valve replacement in patients younger than 60 years of age
thierry aymard
The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2012
View PDFchevron_right
The fate of small-size pericardial heart valve prostheses in an older patient population
Lorenzo Wolf
The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2016
View PDFchevron_right
Long-Term Safety and Effectiveness of Mechanical Versus Biologic Aortic Valve Prostheses in Older Patients: Results From the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery National Database
Sean O'Brien
Circulation, 2013
View PDFchevron_right
Role of age in selecting prosthesis in valvular heart surgery
Husain H Jabbad
Journal of The Egyptian Society of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 2014
View PDFchevron_right
What Prosthesis Should Be Used at Valve Re-Replacement After Structural Valve Deterioration of a Bioprosthesis?
Lawrence Lau
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2006
View PDFchevron_right
Effect of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch on Long-Term Survival With Aortic Valve Replacement: Assessment to 15 Years
Samuel Lichtenstein
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2010
View PDFchevron_right
Early and late-phase events after valve replacement with the St. Jude Medical prosthesis in 1200 patients
glenn laub
The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1994
View PDFchevron_right
Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement—Age-Dependent Choice of Prosthesis Type
Rüdiger Lange
Journal of Clinical Medicine
View PDFchevron_right
An Unexpected Risk Factor for Early Structural Deterioration of Biological Aortic Valve Prostheses
Guglielmo Saitto
View PDFchevron_right
Very Long-Term Survival Implications of Heart Valve Replacement With Tissue Versus Mechanical Prostheses in Adults <60 Years of Age
Pierre Bedard
Circulation, 2007
View PDFchevron_right
Mechanical versus bioprosthetic valve replacement in middle-aged patients
Sherif Negm
European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 2006
View PDFchevron_right
Prognosis after aortic valve replacement with a bioprosthesis: predictions based on meta-analysis and microsimulation
Ewout Steyerberg
2001
View PDFchevron_right
Mitroflow pericardial bioprosthesis experience in aortic valve replacement ≥60 years of age
Richard Brownlee
Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1998
View PDFchevron_right
Long-term follow-up of elderly patients subjected to aortic valve replacement with mechanical prostheses
Gonçalo Freitas Coutinho
Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery, 2009
View PDFchevron_right
Determinants of Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Degeneration
BEGÜM ÖZTÜRK
JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging, 2019
View PDFchevron_right
Aortic valve replacement with biological prosthesis in patients aged 50–69 years
Sunil Ohri
European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 2020
View PDFchevron_right
Late incidence and determinants of reoperation in patients with prosthetic heart valves
Andrew Pipe
European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 2004
View PDFchevron_right
Structural valve deterioration in mitral replacement surgery: Comparison of carpentier-edwards supra-annular porcine and perimount pericardial bioprostheses
Michel Aupart
The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1999
View PDFchevron_right
Ten-year echocardiographic and clinical follow-up of aortic Carpentier-Edwards pericardial and supraannular prosthesis: a case-match study
André Vincentelli
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2002
View PDFchevron_right
Comparison of Carpentier-Edwards pericardial and supraannular bioprostheses in aortic valve replacement
Johanna Takkenberg, A. Bogers
European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 2006
View PDFchevron_right
Early structural valve deterioration of Mitroflow aortic bioprosthesis: mode, incidence, and impact on outcome in a large cohort of patients
Jean-François Roussel
Circulation, 2014
View PDFchevron_right
Aortic biological valve prosthesis in patients younger than 65 years of age: transition to a flexible age limit?
Lars Niclauss
Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery, 2013
View PDFchevron_right
Risk Factors for Starr-Edwards Prosthetic Valve Dysfunction: New Insights into an Old Prosthesis
Nilda Espinola-Zavaleta
World Journal of Cardiovascular Diseases
View PDFchevron_right
Natural History of a Carpentier-Edwards Pericardial Aortic Valve Replaced after 25 Years for Structural Valve Degeneration
Rodolphe Durieux
CASE, 2020
View PDFchevron_right