NANOTECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN INDIA: DRAWING INSIGHTS FROM BIBLIOMETRIC AND INNOVATION INDICATORS (original) (raw)
Related papers
Scientometric Analysis of Nanotechnology Research with Special Reference to India (2008-17)
2020
Nanotechnology research covered in the Web of Science database during the period 2008-17 has been analyzed. A total of 16935 articles were retrieved and this forms the basis of this study. The growth of the article over the study window is 123 articles per year. 2017 is the most productive year with 2220 (13%, approx) articles. Journals and authors\u27 productivity are analyzed based on their h-index and z-index. Among the 30 top productive journals taken for the study, ACS Nano is occupying the top position with 400 articles. The paired t-test showed a strong and significant correlation of h-index and z-index of authors and journals. The top ten leading countries have also been identified in the study and the USA has topped the rank with 29.68% of world share publication while India is in third position with 7.29% of share next to China (i.e. 15.23%). The same rank is observed for India in the Relative Citation Impact, however, with below world average (i.e. 0.81). This study will ...
China and India: The two new players in the nanotechnology race
2012
Nanotechnology is promising to be the 'transformative' technology of the 21st century with its boundless potential to revolutionize a wide range of industries. Stakes are high as projected estimate of market value and economic and social benefits are immense for countries that can attain competency in this technology. This has stimulated OECD countries as well as emerging economies to channel huge resources for developing core capabilities in this technology. Unlike, other key technologies, recent influential reports highlight China in particular and to some extent India, Brazil and some other emerging economies are competing with advanced OECD countries in 'nanotechnology'. The present paper investigates through bibliometric and innovation indicators to what extent China and India have been able to assert their position in the global stage. The paper also underscores the importance of capturing indications from standards and products/processes along with publications and patents to capture more accurately the latent variable 'performance'. Study shows that China's progress is remarkable; it has already attained leading position in publications and standard development. India is making its presence more visible particularly in publications. China's research is more sophisticated and addresses nano-materials and its applications whereas India's research shows healthy trend towards addressing developmental problems.
Visualizing Global Nanotechnology Research on Publication Deeds, 1989-2014
Library Philosophy and Practice, 2016
This study highlights the publication analysis in nanotechnology research outputs in global level as identified the data in Web of Science (WoS) Core Collection database, Thomson Reuters, Philadelphia, USA. It is found that a total output of worldwide scholarly communications in the field of nanotechnology is 20825 during the period between 1989 and 2014. The maximum numbers of outputs of 7269 records (34.91 %) were published by USA which is placed in the first rank. The next position has got by China with 2121 research papers (=10.19%) and followed by Germany is in the third rank. The primary sources are articles with 14564 scholarly papers (=6525%) is ranked in the first place. To predict the value of scientific world publications, time series analysis used and the value predicted for the year 2020 (i.e. 18 years) is 1259.06 and the predicted literature output for the year 2025 in 1377.41(i.e. 23 years). The world growth rate is increasing trend as well as the Indian growth rate is also upward trend.
Nanotechnology publications and citations by leading countries and blocs
Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 2008
This article examines the relative positions with respect to nanotechnology research publications of the European Union (EU), the United States (US), Japan, Germany, China, and three Asian Tiger nations (South Korea, Singapore, and Taiwan). The analysis uses a dataset of nanotechnology publication records for the time period 1990 through 2006 (part year) extracted from the Science Citation Index obtained through the Web of Science and was developed through a two-stage modularized Boolean approach. The results show that although the EU and the US have the highest number of nanotechnology publications, China and other Asian countries are increasing their publications rapidly, taking an ever-larger proportion of the total. When viewed in terms of the quality-based measure of citations, Asian nanotechnology researchers also show growth in recent years. However, by such citation measures, the US still maintains a strongly dominant position, followed by the EU.
Nanomedicine Research in India: A Bibliometric Assessment of Publications Output during 2002-20
International Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation, 2021
The paper describes quantitative and qualitative dimensions of nanomedicine research studies in India. The study is based on research publications data in nanomedicine research (1491 publications) as covered in Scopus data basefor the period 2002-20. The study finds that nanomedicine research in India registered a high 73.7% growth with an average of 22.93 citations per paper. The nano-oncology subfield accounted for the highest share (48.49% share) in the national output, followed by seven other nanomedicine subfields. Jamia Hamdard University, Delhi, Panjab University, Chandigarh and Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi lead as the most productive organizations in the country. The paper also lists the most productive authors in nanomedicine research. The most productive research journals that reported nanomedicine research in India include Nanomedicine, International Journal of Nanomedicine and Current Pharmaceutical Design. In addition, International Journal of Pharmaceutics, International Journal of Nanomedicine and Drug Delivery Today topped in the list of most cited research journals.
Indian Publication Output during 1998-2009: Quantitative Analysis Based on Web of Science
Journal of Indian Library Association, 2011
An attempt has been made to study the Indian publications output under various parameters viz.Publications counts, Journals covered, Subject, language, and Institutions wise distribution along with the Collaboration country pattern taking web of Science as the source. Publications show the steady growth in number of total items during 1998 to 2009. It is observed that in the field of Basic sciences Indian scientists prefer to publish more papers in non Indian journals covered by SCI, and reverse trend is observed for applied sciences. Institution wise highest numbers of items have contributed by the authors of Indian Institution of Technology followed by Indian Institute of Science, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, and All Indian Institution of Medical science. Indian researchers collaboration pattern show a positive trend with USA authors. From the study it has been noticed that there is no difference in findings of earlier studies in respect of publications output though taken for the different time periods. It is concluded that overall trend almost remains the same as reported in the earlier studies which have also taken qualitative aspect in view.
Library Philosophy and Practice , 2021
The study investigates Nanotechnology Research during 1996 to 2020 using Scopus Database. It attempts to quantify the national contribution to Nanotechnology Research highlighting the growth of research in the SAARC nations using different scientometric indicators. The results of the study show the Growth Rate, Annual Growth percentage of the publications, most prolific author, application of Lotka's Law of Scientific Productivity, most prolific journal, institution, funding agency, geographical distribution and document forms of the publications in Nanotechnology during 1996 to 2020 downloaded in a suitable retrieval technique from the Scopus database. The results reveal that Indian Contribution in Nanotechnology Research is excellent among SAARC nations. Bhutan and Maldives have no record of Publication in Scopus database in the period taken for study.
A Scientometric Analysis of S&T Publications Output by India during 1985-2002
DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology
The paper analyses India's publications output in three major international multidisciplinary databases, as indexed during 1981-2005. It reports on India's comparative strength in world science and technology (S&T) output, its growth and decline, its strong and weak subject areas of research, media of communication, its collaborative profile and quality of S&T output, institutional productivity and quality, and dynamics of Indian research at institutional and sectoral levels. The study also provides suggestions for improving the quantity and quality of research S&T in India.
China Moving Ahead in the Global Nanotechnology Race: Evidences from Scientometric Study
2012
Nanotechnology is emerging as a key technology of the 21st century wherein stakes are high as projected estimate of economic and social benefi ts are immense for countries that can attain competency in this technology. A Country/fi rm's competency can be judged from various dimensions: from research outcomes to fi nal product/processes developed, its international market reach and monopoly position in domestic and high value markets. Unlike other key technologies, in nanotechnology we observe emerging economies particularly China competing with advanced OECD economies. This sends an important signal as emerging economies are generally involved in adaptive R&D and undertake follow on innovation. Keeping this in context, the paper attempts to capture the contemporary position of nanotechnology development in China through bibliometric and innovation indicators. We argue that applying innovation indicators such as standards and products/processes developed along with bibliometric indicators provide a deeper insight of a country's development. The study shows China has been able to make an assertion in this area and has potentiality to forge ahead. It is emerging as a leading country in publication and standardization activity.
Research output of science, technology and bioscience publications in Asia
Science Editing, 2014
Publication growth rates in Asia have been rapidly increasing since 2000. Amid this constant rise in the quantity of papers, however, concerns over the quality of research output in Asia have also increased. The purpose of this paper is to examine science and technology journals in Asia where research is burgeoning and to find ways to enhance the visibility and frequency of citation of articles published by non-Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development and developing countries in Asia. In this work, the research output of twelve countries in science and engineering over the last five years is studied, using the Scopus database. We compared publication growth, number of citations per publication, the field-weighted citation impact of publications, national and international collaboration rates, and the number of journals in each country found in the Scopus database. We find that a predominant number of research papers produced in developing Asian countries are in technology. Hence, most research papers produced in Asian regions appear to have lower citation rates and are often devaluated. We suggest this devaluation relates to an individual state's strategy for national development, or policy priorities for choosing whether to invest primarily in basic science or applied science. Further, this work suggests that enhancing the accessibility and visibility of local academic journals can be conducive to enhancing the quality of research output, both in developing countries and in the world overall.